The 'Trump Paradox' in the Midterm Elections: The Stronger He Is, the More Dangerous It Is for the GOP

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-21

Introduzione

"The Trump Paradox: What's Good for Him Is Weighing Down His Party" This article examines the "Trump paradox": as former President Donald Trump's national approval declines, his grip on the Republican Party intensifies. However, his strategy of enforcing personal loyalty through primary challenges and endorsements risks harming the GOP's broader electoral prospects. Trump's recent victories in ousting critics like Representatives Thomas Massie and Bill Cassidy demonstrate his enduring command over the party's base. Yet, this focus on loyalty may alienate independent and moderate voters crucial for winning general elections. Furthermore, Trump's political weakness limits his ability to advance legislative priorities, creating tension with congressional Republicans. While solidifying his internal authority, Trump's influence may be pushing the party into a more difficult position for the upcoming midterms, where Democratic voters currently show higher enthusiasm. The article concludes that the GOP's greatest challenge may not be Democrats, but the narrowing electoral path shaped by Trump's dominance.

Original Title: The Trump paradox: What's good for him is weighing down his party

Original Author: the Washington Post

Translator: Peggy

Editor's Note: The political paradox surrounding Trump is becoming increasingly clear: while his approval rating among the national electorate continues to decline, his dominance within the Republican Party is growing ever stronger.

The core discussion of this article is not whether Trump can still influence the Republican Party, but rather how this influence is reshaping the party's electoral prospects. On one hand, he forces party candidates to pledge allegiance to him through endorsements, primary challenges, and political purges. On the other hand, this political vetting centered on personal loyalty may also weaken the Republican Party's competitiveness in the general election.

From Thomas Massie and Bill Cassidy, to the Indiana state senate and Texas Senate primaries, Trump's "politics of vengeance" continues to demonstrate his ability to mobilize the Republican grassroots. The problem, however, is that winning a party primary does not equate to winning a national election. For the GOP, the real risk is not that Trump cannot control the party, but that the deeper his control, the narrower the party's appeal may become among independent and moderate voters.

What is more noteworthy is that Trump's strength has not translated into effective legislative capabilities. On issues such as the gas tax, voting rights bills, immigration funding, and military action against Iran, there remains significant tension between him and congressional Republicans. This means that while Trump can force party members to declare their loyalty, he may not be able to make them bear the full political cost for his agenda.

Trump has built a party that is highly loyal to him. Even when his executive actions anger the broader public, Republicans still choose to follow him. This political structure, in turn, undermines his influence with voters beyond his base.

For the midterm elections, the biggest variable the Republican Party currently faces may not be the Democrats, but Trump himself. For Trump, victories in primaries are consolidating his authority within the party; but for the GOP, these victories may also be pushing it towards a more difficult general election to win.

The following is the original text:

U.S. President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House after arriving on Marine One on Friday. (Eric Lee/Pool/The Washington Post)

President Donald Trump does not believe in the so-called "laws of political gravity."

Nationally, as his standing sinks—multiple polls show his approval rating near historic lows—he is tightening his grip on the Republican Party, jeopardizing the electoral prospects this fall of the party that now obeys his will through a series of unpopular, and at times brazen, actions.

The result: a president who is historically powerful in demanding political fealty within his party, yet whose frequent executive actions continue to alienate the broader public. This paradox leaves him increasingly unwilling, and less able, to work through Congress on issues that matter most to voters. And it is a cycle that Trump appears neither willing nor able to break.

On Tuesday, Trump claimed one of his most coveted trophies: Libertarian Republican Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), an eight-term congressman who was one of Trump's most prominent GOP critics in the House and who led an effort to force the release of government files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was ousted. Trump initially opposed the move, changing his stance only after he realized he could not stop it.

Massie was soundly defeated in the primary by a previously little-known political newcomer, former Navy SEAL Ed Garlean, who was personally selected by Trump and backed by tens of millions of dollars from Trump-aligned groups.

Massie's defeat came three days after Louisiana Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy also lost his race. Trump had called Cassidy "very disloyal." Five years ago, Cassidy voted to convict Trump in his second impeachment trial over the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Though the senator had spent years trying—often awkwardly—to repair the relationship, he ultimately failed even to make a runoff.

Earlier this month, Trump's "revenge tour" swept through Indiana, where Republican voters heeded his call to oust five of seven state senators who had refused Trump's demands to redraw the state's congressional maps. One race remains unresolved, with the latest vote count showing just a two-vote margin between the two candidates.

On Tuesday, Trump again flexed his political muscle: In the Texas Republican Senate primary runoff, he announced his support for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over incumbent Sen. John Cornyn. The move frustrated many Republicans on Capitol Hill, who view Cornyn as the stronger general-election candidate; if Paxton wins, the GOP may have to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to ensure its candidate prevails in the deep-red state, money that may be needed to support candidates elsewhere.

But as often is the case, Trump made clear that the decision was personal, not tactical or policy-driven. Cornyn has occasionally criticized Trump in the past, though he has worked hard recently to curry favor, even recently introducing legislation to name one of the country's longest highways after Trump.

It did not work. In a social media post endorsing Paxton, Trump wrote, "John Cornyn is a good guy, and I have worked well with him, but he was not supportive of me during my difficult times."

"I actually think MAGA has never been more united," Trump told reporters Tuesday. But if Republicans are to maintain control of Congress in the fall election, they will need to secure a significant share of other voters. And in Trump's view, the election is tied to his own political survival.

In January, he told a gathering of Republican House members, "You've got to win the midterms, because if we don't win the midterms, then it's going to be—I mean, they'll find a reason to impeach me. I'll be impeached."

But right now, the biggest drag on Republicans' ability to maintain their narrow House and Senate majorities is Trump himself. A New York Times/Siena poll released Monday is just the latest evidence: The public is deeply unhappy with his handling of the war in Iran and the cost of living, and even on immigration, his strongest issue, Trump trails by 15 points.

Among crucial independent voters, Trump's approval rating has sunk to 26 percent. Forty-seven percent of respondents said his policies have hurt them, up from 41 percent last fall. And perhaps the most alarming poll number for Republicans: Democratic voters are more enthusiastic about voting this year, leading by 11 points on the hypothetical question of which party they would support if the election were held today.

At the same time, even Republicans have been unnerved by some of Trump's recent attention-grabbing actions. These include his $100 billion lawsuit against the IRS this year over leaked tax returns, which he settled.

The settlement will create an $1.8 billion taxpayer-funded compensation fund for those who claim they have been persecuted by a "weaponized justice system" like Trump. Beneficiaries are likely to include some of those charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, when Trump supporters tried to overturn his loss in the 2020 presidential election.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Tuesday when asked about the fund, "I'm not a big fan."

Democrats were more blunt.

"The corruption has never been more naked, or more broad. But here is what is happening now: You write the checks, Trump and his cronies cash them. And the American taxpayer, already struggling with high prices, will pay the bill," said Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) at a hearing featuring acting Attorney General Todd Branch.

Under the settlement, Trump and his sons are barred from personally receiving payments from the so-called "anti-weaponization" fund. But the IRS will also be "permanently barred and precluded" from collecting any unpaid taxes owed by Trump, his family members or his businesses that accrued before the settlement was reached.

And for all of Trump's strength on unilateral executive actions, his political weakness is also sapping his influence to get things done through the legislative branch. Much of his agenda is stalled in Congress.

Neither Thune nor House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has embraced Trump's call for a gas tax holiday. The Senate has resisted his demands to end the filibuster, which Trump wants to use to pass his high-priority Save America Act, which includes a provision requiring people to prove their citizenship when registering to vote. Trump has called the bill necessary to secure elections, but opponents argue it would lead to voter suppression.

Another recent point of frustration for Trump: The Senate parliamentarian has refused to allow hundreds of millions of dollars for security costs for his deeply unpopular White House ballroom project to be tucked into an immigration enforcement funding bill under consideration.

For Trump, beyond the "golden halo" that comes with defeating incumbent Republicans, there may also be a shadow. These members will remain in office until January, and presumably will be less afraid of him.

On Tuesday, Cassidy, who just lost his primary, mounted one act of public defiance: For the first time, he voted to advance a resolution to stop Trump from continuing to order strikes against Iran.

"In Louisiana, I've heard from many, including supporters of President Trump, who are concerned about this war," Cassidy said in a statement.

In February, Massie told The Washington Post, "I have colleagues who are just waiting for their primary to be over before they start to develop a more independent voice."

For their own political survival, they may have to.

Original link

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the core argument of the article regarding Donald Trump's influence on the Republican Party?

AThe article argues that while Donald Trump has gained near-total dominance over the Republican Party, this influence paradoxically makes the party more vulnerable in general elections by alienating independent and moderate voters, thereby jeopardizing its electoral prospects.

QAccording to the article, how did Trump demonstrate his political strength within the GOP through primary elections?

ATrump demonstrated his strength by successfully endorsing and helping to defeat incumbent Republican critics in primaries, such as Representatives Thomas Massie and Bill Cassidy, several Indiana state senators, and by backing Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over incumbent Senator John Cornyn.

QWhat is one key legislative area where Trump's agenda has stalled in Congress, as mentioned in the article?

AOne key area is his proposed 'Save America Act,' which includes a proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration. This bill has faced resistance in Congress, with opponents viewing it as voter suppression.

QWhat specific action by Trump, related to the IRS, caused concern even among some Republicans?

ATrump's settlement with the IRS, which created an $1.8 billion taxpayer-funded 'anti-weaponization' compensation fund potentially benefiting individuals charged in the January 6 Capitol attack, caused concern. Senate GOP leader John Thune stated he was 'not a fan' of the fund.

QWhat does the article suggest is the 'shadow' or potential downside for Trump after he defeats incumbent Republicans in primaries?

AThe article suggests that defeated incumbents, who will remain in office until January, may feel less beholden to Trump and could become more independent and vocal in their opposition to his agenda, as hinted by actions from Bill Cassidy and Thomas Massie.

Letture associate

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbit23 min fa

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbit23 min fa

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

In the week of May 15-19, 2026, U.S. long-term Treasury yields surged to multi-year highs, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.2%, a level unseen since 2007, and the 10-year yield climbing to 4.687%. Equity markets declined in response. Four primary factors are driving the rise in yields. First, stubborn inflation persists, with April wholesale prices rising 6% year-over-year, fueling expectations of potential future Fed rate hikes instead of cuts. Second, newly confirmed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh inherits a complex inflation battle, with markets closely awaiting his first FOMC meeting. Third, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health, marked by large deficits and rising debt servicing costs, is eroding the traditional "safe-haven" premium for Treasuries. Fourth, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax cuts are projected to add trillions to the national debt, contributing to Moody's recent credit rating downgrade. Rising yields pressure stocks through several channels: a higher discount rate reduces the present value of future earnings (especially for growth stocks); rising risk-free rates compress equity risk premiums, making bonds relatively more attractive; higher borrowing costs impact consumers and corporations; and a stronger dollar affects multinational earnings. For investors, the environment favors value and financial stocks over long-duration growth stocks. Bond investors find attractive yields in short to intermediate maturities, while income investors see the best fixed-income opportunities in over a decade. Key developments to watch include Chair Warsh's first FOMC meeting, upcoming inflation data, Treasury auction demand, and whether the 30-year yield approaches 6%, a level that could trigger a more sustained equity valuation reset. The bond market's message is clear: the era of cheap government borrowing is over, posing a central challenge for markets in late 2026.

marsbit24 min fa

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

marsbit24 min fa

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

The article "Is Strategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Decoding 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment" analyzes why companies might sell their bitcoin holdings, arguing it's not necessarily negative. It begins by noting the market's surprise at Strategy's potential sale, contrasting its previous "never sell" stance. The core argument is that corporate decisions prioritize shareholder value, and selling bitcoin can be a rational strategic choice. The article outlines five key financial reasons for such sales: 1. **Increase Bitcoin Holdings Per Share:** Companies can use proceeds from bitcoin sales to repurchase shares when the stock price is undervalued relative to its bitcoin assets. This reduces the outstanding share count, potentially increasing the bitcoin amount backing each remaining share. 2. **Optimize Capital Structure & Reduce Financing Costs:** Building cash reserves through bitcoin sales can improve credit ratings (as favored by agencies like S&P), leading to lower future borrowing costs. Repaying debt with sale proceeds also reduces financial leverage. 3. **Legitimate Tax Planning:** In the absence of wash-sale rules for bitcoin in the US, companies can sell to realize capital losses, then repurchase, lowering the tax basis of their holdings and creating tax offsets. 4. **Counter Negative Market Narratives:** A controlled, non-disruptive sale could demonstrate market resilience and disprove fears that corporate selling would crash the market, thereby normalizing bitcoin as a corporate treasury asset. 5. **Repurchase Preferred Stock at a Discount:** If a company's preferred stock trades significantly below its face value, using bitcoin sale proceeds to repurchase it can retire expensive liabilities at a profit, saving on future dividend payments. The conclusion emphasizes that bitcoin's monetary properties offer flexibility. Strategic sales can protect corporate and shareholder interests, making asset utilization more important than rigid "hold" mandates.

marsbit54 min fa

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

marsbit54 min fa

Why Did Zhipu Surge Nearly 30% in a Single Day?

"Global AI Model Unicorn" Zhipu's stock surged nearly 30% in a single day, reaching a new market cap high. The catalyst was the launch of its GLM-5.1-highspeed API, boasting a generation speed of **400 tokens per second**, setting a new global benchmark. This speed, roughly 3-5 times faster than industry leaders like OpenAI's GPT-4o and Anthropic's Claude, is achieved **without compromising the full-scale model's capabilities**. In the era of AI Agents requiring dozens of self-calls, such latency reduction is critical, transforming speed from a system metric into a determinant of intelligence limits. The breakthrough stems from a three-layer technical overhaul: 1. **TileRT Inference Engine**: Compiles the entire model into a continuous, always-on computation pipeline using "Warp Specialization," minimizing GPU idle time by having different processor groups handle data loading, computation, and communication in parallel. 2. **Heterogeneous Parallelism for MLA**: To efficiently run the GLM-5.1 model using the MLA attention mechanism, TileRT employs a heterogeneous strategy. One GPU handles sparse indexing/routing, while the others perform dense computation, optimizing for MLA's unique workflow. 3. **ZCube Network Architecture**: Replaces the standard Spine-Leaf (ROFT) network topology with a flat, dual-group interconnect. This design creates a single optimal path between any two GPUs, eliminating network congestion at scale and reducing latency. The business impact is significant: a 15% increase in cluster throughput (free extra capacity), a 40.6% reduction in tail latency (improved stability), and a one-third cut in networking hardware costs. Long-term, this innovation challenges the dominance of NVIDIA's integrated hardware-software stack (GPU+NVLink+InfiniBand), potentially benefiting manufacturers of high-density Leaf switches and optical modules while lowering the software barrier for domestic AI chips like Huawei's Ascend. The innovation proves that more can be achieved with the same compute, reshaping the infrastructure beyond just GPUs.

marsbit2 h fa

Why Did Zhipu Surge Nearly 30% in a Single Day?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片