The Second Half of Stablecoins No Longer Belongs to the Crypto World

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-21

Introduzione

The article discusses the shift in the stablecoin market from the crypto sector to traditional finance, highlighted by Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK for up to $1.8 billion in March 2026. This move came after Coinbase abandoned a $2 billion deal for BVNK months earlier, signaling intensified competition for stablecoin infrastructure. BVNK specializes in cross-border payments using a "stablecoin sandwich" model: converting fiat to stablecoins like USDC for blockchain transfer, then back to local currency, reducing transaction times and costs. Its key asset is a suite of global licenses, including EMI from the UK FCA and CASP under EU MiCA, enabling compliance across 130+ countries. Mastercard's acquisition aims to integrate BVNK into its Multi-Token Network (MTN), a private blockchain for tokenized assets, addressing MTN's lack of connectivity with public chains. This enables atomic settlements, 24/7 B2B transactions, and programmable payments. The strategy contrasts with Visa’s partnership-focused approach, emphasizing direct control over infrastructure. The U.S. GENIUS Act (July 2025) provided regulatory clarity, defining stablecoins as non-securities under OCC oversight, which facilitated Mastercard’s move. The deal pressures players like Ripple and traditional correspondent banks, as Mastercard’s global network could disrupt cross-border payment fees. Ultimately, stablecoin evolution is becoming invisible to users—embedded in traditional finance for efficienc...

Author:白话区块链

March 17, 2026, Mastercard announced the acquisition of BVNK for up to $1.8 billion.

This name is almost unheard of outside the crypto circle. But four months ago, Coinbase was willing to pay $2 billion for it, reaching the due diligence stage before pulling out at the last moment.

What a crypto exchange giant just abandoned, a traditional payment giant immediately picked up, and at a 10% discount.

The signal from this deal couldn't be clearer:The battle for stablecoin infrastructure has spread from within the crypto world to the heart of traditional finance.

What Coinbase Didn't Want, Mastercard Rushed to Buy

First, the failed acquisition.

In October 2025, Coinbase and BVNK signed an exclusive negotiation agreement, with an offer of approximately $2 billion. After entering due diligence, both parties announced in November that they would not proceed further. The reasons were not made public, but industry speculation points in several directions:As a crypto exchange, Coinbase faces much higher regulatory pressure for mergers and acquisitions than traditional financial institutions; and Coinbase itself is also investing more resources in the endogenous growth of the Base chain. Spending $2 billion to buy a payment intermediary might not be the optimal choice.

Mastercard entered the scene almost simultaneously as Coinbase withdrew. The process from介入谈判 to locking in the deal was extremely fast.

The deal structure was $1.5 billion in upfront cash plus a $300 million performance-based earn-out. Considering BVNK's valuation was only $750 million during its Series B funding round in December 2024, the $1.8 billion price tag意味着 the value more than doubled in just over a year.This premium isn't for technology, it's for licenses and pipelines.

An interesting comparison: In October 2024, Stripe acquired the stablecoin company Bridge for $1.1 billion. A year and a half later, Mastercard offered $1.8 billion for BVNK. The value of stablecoin infrastructure continues to rise.Pricing power in this sector is shifting from crypto VCs to the CFOs of traditional finance.

What Exactly is BVNK Selling?

For example:

An export老板 in Guangzhou making plush toys needs to receive payment from a buyer in Nigeria every quarter.The traditional path is through correspondent banks:Money starts from a Nigerian bank, passes through at least two intermediary banks, deducting several layers of fees, arrives in 2-3 days, and the exchange rate is also marked down. If it coincides with a weekend or African bank system maintenance, add another two days.

What BVNK does is called the "stablecoin sandwich":It takes in local fiat currency at the front end, automatically converts it to USDC in the backend, transmits it via blockchain, and converts it back to local currency at the destination. The entire process can be compressed to minutes, with fees an order of magnitude lower than traditional wire transfers.

But this isn't the most valuable part of BVNK. There are other companies doing similar things; Fireblocks does it, Circle does it too.BVNK's real moat is that stack of licenses.

In the UK, it acquired an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license issued by the FCA through its acquisition of System Pay Services. In the EU, it obtained a CASP license under the MiCA framework from the Malta Financial Services Authority, allowing it to operate throughout the European Economic Area. Add to that coverage for fiat currency exchange in over 130 countries, an annual processing volume of approximately $30 billion, and clients including Worldpay, Flywire, and dLocal—all major players in the payments industry.

Simply put,BVNK is a stablecoin plumber that already has a global passport. In today's increasingly strict regulatory environment, this passport is more valuable than any technology.

Mastercard's Real Intent: The Missing Piece for MTN

Mastercard's purchase of BVNK is not a whim.

For the past two years, Mastercard has been building something called the Multi-Token Network (MTN)—a private, permissioned blockchain specifically for settling tokenized bank deposits, regulated stablecoins, and tokenized assets. JPMorgan and Standard Chartered have already conducted tests on it.

But MTN has a critical weakness: it is a closed network, lacking efficient bridges to the public链 world.You can think of MTN as a newly built highway, but without on-ramps and off-ramps connecting it to city streets.

BVNK is that ramp.

After the acquisition, Mastercard can suddenly do much more. Atomic settlement—payment and ownership transfer simultaneously, no longer waiting for ACH or SWIFT's 2-3 day delay. 24/7 cross-border B2B settlement, regardless of whether banks are closed.And programmable payments:For example, a supplier payment where stablecoins are automatically released by a smart contract only after the system confirms shipment and an on-chain Oracle verifies it.

Mastercard also has a system called Crypto Credential, which uses human-readable aliases (similar to email addresses) instead of complex wallet addresses, ensuring every transaction complies with the FATF Travel Rule.BVNK's infrastructure directly integrates with this authentication, allowing merchants to receive stablecoins without touching private keys.

It's worth noting the divergence in strategies between Mastercard and Visa here.Visa is taking the "make friends" route—partnering with Solana, deeply integrating with Circle, and building a platform called VTAP for tokenized assets, focusing on the retail end and USDC.Mastercard, on the other hand, has chosen to "buy out"—spending heavily to swallow core infrastructure directly, building its own multi-chain, multi-asset network, focusing on heavy-duty B2B settlement.

Which path is right? Unknown. But Mastercard's path is more expensive and also more irreversible.

The GENIUS Act: The True Catalyst for This Deal

Mastercard dared to spend $1.8 billion based on one prerequisite:In July 2025, the U.S. President signed the《GENIUS Act》.

This is the first comprehensive federal legislation on stablecoins in U.S. history. It does several key things:Clarifies that "payment stablecoins" are neither securities nor commodities, falling under the jurisdiction of bank regulators (OCC); requires issuers to maintain 1:1 highly liquid reserves and undergo monthly audits; even if the issuer goes bankrupt, holders have priority claim rights to the reserve assets.

Translation:Stablecoins are finally out of the gray area.For a publicly traded company like Mastercard, this means the board can approve large acquisitions without worrying about the SEC knocking on the door in the middle of the night.

By acquiring BVNK, an entity licensed in multiple countries, Mastercard essentially bought a "regulated seat." Under the GENIUS Act framework, it can more freely manage and issue payment stablecoins, with compliance costs largely pre-digested.

This is also why Coinbase couldn't close the deal while Mastercard could—As a licensed bank service provider, the regulatory certainty for Mastercard to integrate BVNK is far higher than for a crypto exchange.

Who Should Be Nervous?

The most direct impact falls on Ripple. Cross-border payments are a story Ripple has been telling for nearly a decade, but it始终 lacked Mastercard's network covering 150 million merchants worldwide. Now that Mastercard itself possesses on-chain settlement capabilities, Ripple's narrative becomes awkward—Your technology might have been earlier, but their pipeline is thicker.

Traditional correspondent banks aren't doing well either.If Mastercard can route high-value B2B payments directly through the on-chain轨道, those banks that rely on cross-border remittance intermediary fees may see their commission income plummet.

However, there are also different voices within the crypto community. Stablecoins were originally a product of the decentralized world, but now the流量 is running on Mastercard's permissioned链 and licensed nodes—how is this different from traditional finance?The Bank of England is already worried about something else:If stablecoins become too easy to use, and consumers move bank deposits to stablecoin accounts, what happens to commercial banks' credit supply?

Summary

Ultimately,stablecoins are transforming from "crypto products" into "financial pipelines."As Mastercard's Chief Product Officer Jorn Lambert said, most financial institutions and fintech companies will迟早 offer digital currency services—what Mastercard aims to do is become that pipeline.

Users swipe cards at the front end, while USDC might be running in the backend. They don't perceive the blockchain; they only perceive faster and cheaper.

This is the true face of stablecoin mainstreaming: not making everyone use crypto wallets, but making everyone use stablecoins unknowingly.

$1.8 billion—Mastercard isn't buying a company; it's buying the toll booth for the next-generation payment system.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the key signal from the Mastercard-BVNK acquisition regarding the stablecoin infrastructure battle?

AThe acquisition signaled that the battle for stablecoin infrastructure has expanded from within the crypto industry to the heart of traditional finance.

QWhy did Coinbase abandon its planned acquisition of BVNK, and why was Mastercard able to proceed?

ACoinbase likely faced higher regulatory scrutiny as a crypto exchange and chose to focus resources on its Base chain. Mastercard, as a licensed traditional financial services provider, had greater regulatory certainty and could integrate BVNK's licensed operations more easily.

QWhat is BVNK's core business model and its main competitive advantage (its 'moat')?

ABVNK's core business is the 'stablecoin sandwich' model, facilitating fast, low-cost cross-border payments by converting local fiat to stablecoins like USDC for transfer. Its main competitive advantage is its portfolio of global licenses (e.g., UK EMI, EU CASP under MiCA), which act as a regulatory moat.

QHow does the GENIUS Act serve as a catalyst for deals like Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK?

AThe GENIUS Act provided the first comprehensive U.S. federal legislation for stablecoins, clarifying they are not securities, establishing clear regulatory oversight, and ensuring consumer protections. This regulatory clarity gave public companies like Mastercard the confidence to pursue major acquisitions in the space without fear of sudden regulatory action.

QWhat is the ultimate vision for stablecoins as illustrated by Mastercard's strategy, according to the article?

AThe ultimate vision is for stablecoins to transition from a 'crypto product' to a 'financial pipeline.' Users will experience faster, cheaper payments without needing to interact directly with blockchain technology or crypto wallets, using them seamlessly in the background of traditional financial services.

Letture associate

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit1 h fa

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit1 h fa

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit1 h fa

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit1 h fa

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit3 h fa

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit3 h fa

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit3 h fa

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片