The Person Who Made $69 Million from NFTs Four Years Ago Is Still Making Money

深潮Pubblicato 2025-12-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-10

Introduzione

Four years after making $69 million from an NFT sale, Beeple continues to innovate and profit in the digital art space. Despite the decline in the NFT market, he recently launched "Regular Animals" at Art Basel—a collection of 256 eerie robotic dogs with human faces resembling figures like Musk, Warhol, and Picasso. These AI-driven sculptures use cameras and visual algorithms to create art based on their surroundings. The NFTs, initially given away for free, now trade for over 10 ETH (around $35,000) on OpenSea, valuing the giveaway near $9 million. A physical series of 1,024 pieces is also available, with listings reaching $6,500 on eBay—though the digital versions remain more valuable. Beeple, who once struggled to sell art for over $100, now operates a large studio with a team of artists and engineers, including a former Boeing engineer and a renowned art curator. His work continues to bridge crypto and traditional art, gaining attention from outlets like WSJ.

Written by: Cookie, Lüdong

beeple, the man who sold one NFT for a staggering $69 million, has long been seen as a symbol of the golden age of NFTs that once was.

Although the glory of NFTs has faded, beeple and his team have remained active in the NFT space. At this year's Art Basel, he brought another "golden dog" to the currently quiet NFT market—Regular Animals.

Yesterday, multiple Regular Animals were sold on OpenSea for over 10 ETH (approximately $35,000) each. These artworks were given away for free at Art Basel, with a total of 256 pieces. At this price, beeple essentially gave away nearly ten million dollars worth of NFTs at Art Basel.

The project that beeple and his team brought to Art Basel is Regular Animals. These are robotic dogs, as shown in the image below. They look somewhat eerie because these robotic dogs have human faces, and they are faces of well-known figures such as Musk, Andy Warhol, Zuckerberg, Picasso, and even beeple himself.

Of course, it's not just about the eerie visual effect. These robotic dogs use the cameras on their heads to observe their surroundings and employ an evolving visual algorithm to create artworks.

The selection of these famous figures is not arbitrary. The reason for choosing the aforementioned celebrities is that they have influenced how we view the world, whether through algorithms, art, or politics. As humans, we observe the world through these perspectives, and so do these robotic dogs. At Art Basel, these robotic dogs and humans observed each other, and each moment of observation became an artwork created by the robotic dogs. These artworks are also like autobiographies of these robotic dogs.

Interestingly, Regular Animals also has a physical series, with a total of 1,024 pieces. On eBay, someone has already listed one for a fixed price of $6,500. The market's valuation is that NFTs are far more valuable than physical paintings, reminiscent of Damien Hirst's "The Currency" series years ago, which forced owners to choose between physical and NFT versions.

Before achieving great success in the NFT field, beeple had been creating art every day since 2007 but had never sold anything for more than $100. After gaining fame and fortune, beeple did not squander it like some artists or crypto project teams. Instead, he acquired a studio/gallery of about 460 square meters, built a team of dozens of 3D artists, engineers, and researchers (even including a former Boeing engineer), invited Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev, the former director of the Castello di Rivoli Museum of Contemporary Art, as an advisor, and continuously exhibited at art shows around the world while creating new artworks.

This exhibition of beeple's robotic dogs has not only gained attention in the crypto circle due to its price but has also been covered by traditional media outlets like WSJ.

Domande pertinenti

QWho is Beeple and what is he known for in the NFT world?

ABeeple is an artist who gained fame for selling an NFT for $69 million, symbolizing the golden era of NFTs.

QWhat is the name of Beeple's latest NFT project featured at the Basel Art Show?

ABeeple's latest project is called 'Regular Animals,' which features robotic dogs with human faces of famous personalities.

QHow many Regular Animals NFTs were distributed for free at the Basel Art Show, and what was their estimated total value?

A256 Regular Animals NFTs were distributed for free at the Basel Art Show, with an estimated total value of nearly $9 million based on secondary market sales.

QWhat unique ability do the Regular Animals robotic dogs have?

AThe Regular Animals robotic dogs use cameras to observe their surroundings and employ an evolving visual algorithm to create artworks, which serve as their autobiographies.

QHow has Beeple's approach to his career evolved since his NFT success?

ABeeple has established a large studio, assembled a team of artists and engineers, and continues to create and exhibit artworks globally, focusing on innovation rather than extravagance.

Letture associate

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手7 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手7 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit9 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit9 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手10 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手10 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit11 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit11 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片