The Person Who Made $69 Million from NFTs Four Years Ago Is Still Making Money

深潮Pubblicato 2025-12-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-10

Introduzione

Four years after making $69 million from an NFT sale, Beeple continues to innovate and profit in the digital art space. Despite the decline in the NFT market, he recently launched "Regular Animals" at Art Basel—a collection of 256 eerie robotic dogs with human faces resembling figures like Musk, Warhol, and Picasso. These AI-driven sculptures use cameras and visual algorithms to create art based on their surroundings. The NFTs, initially given away for free, now trade for over 10 ETH (around $35,000) on OpenSea, valuing the giveaway near $9 million. A physical series of 1,024 pieces is also available, with listings reaching $6,500 on eBay—though the digital versions remain more valuable. Beeple, who once struggled to sell art for over $100, now operates a large studio with a team of artists and engineers, including a former Boeing engineer and a renowned art curator. His work continues to bridge crypto and traditional art, gaining attention from outlets like WSJ.

Written by: Cookie, Lüdong

beeple, the man who sold one NFT for a staggering $69 million, has long been seen as a symbol of the golden age of NFTs that once was.

Although the glory of NFTs has faded, beeple and his team have remained active in the NFT space. At this year's Art Basel, he brought another "golden dog" to the currently quiet NFT market—Regular Animals.

Yesterday, multiple Regular Animals were sold on OpenSea for over 10 ETH (approximately $35,000) each. These artworks were given away for free at Art Basel, with a total of 256 pieces. At this price, beeple essentially gave away nearly ten million dollars worth of NFTs at Art Basel.

The project that beeple and his team brought to Art Basel is Regular Animals. These are robotic dogs, as shown in the image below. They look somewhat eerie because these robotic dogs have human faces, and they are faces of well-known figures such as Musk, Andy Warhol, Zuckerberg, Picasso, and even beeple himself.

Of course, it's not just about the eerie visual effect. These robotic dogs use the cameras on their heads to observe their surroundings and employ an evolving visual algorithm to create artworks.

The selection of these famous figures is not arbitrary. The reason for choosing the aforementioned celebrities is that they have influenced how we view the world, whether through algorithms, art, or politics. As humans, we observe the world through these perspectives, and so do these robotic dogs. At Art Basel, these robotic dogs and humans observed each other, and each moment of observation became an artwork created by the robotic dogs. These artworks are also like autobiographies of these robotic dogs.

Interestingly, Regular Animals also has a physical series, with a total of 1,024 pieces. On eBay, someone has already listed one for a fixed price of $6,500. The market's valuation is that NFTs are far more valuable than physical paintings, reminiscent of Damien Hirst's "The Currency" series years ago, which forced owners to choose between physical and NFT versions.

Before achieving great success in the NFT field, beeple had been creating art every day since 2007 but had never sold anything for more than $100. After gaining fame and fortune, beeple did not squander it like some artists or crypto project teams. Instead, he acquired a studio/gallery of about 460 square meters, built a team of dozens of 3D artists, engineers, and researchers (even including a former Boeing engineer), invited Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev, the former director of the Castello di Rivoli Museum of Contemporary Art, as an advisor, and continuously exhibited at art shows around the world while creating new artworks.

This exhibition of beeple's robotic dogs has not only gained attention in the crypto circle due to its price but has also been covered by traditional media outlets like WSJ.

Domande pertinenti

QWho is Beeple and what is he known for in the NFT world?

ABeeple is an artist who gained fame for selling an NFT for $69 million, symbolizing the golden era of NFTs.

QWhat is the name of Beeple's latest NFT project featured at the Basel Art Show?

ABeeple's latest project is called 'Regular Animals,' which features robotic dogs with human faces of famous personalities.

QHow many Regular Animals NFTs were distributed for free at the Basel Art Show, and what was their estimated total value?

A256 Regular Animals NFTs were distributed for free at the Basel Art Show, with an estimated total value of nearly $9 million based on secondary market sales.

QWhat unique ability do the Regular Animals robotic dogs have?

AThe Regular Animals robotic dogs use cameras to observe their surroundings and employ an evolving visual algorithm to create artworks, which serve as their autobiographies.

QHow has Beeple's approach to his career evolved since his NFT success?

ABeeple has established a large studio, assembled a team of artists and engineers, and continues to create and exhibit artworks globally, focusing on innovation rather than extravagance.

Letture associate

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit46 min fa

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit46 min fa

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit1 h fa

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit1 h fa

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit1 h fa

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片