The Hunter Becomes the Hunted: The Most Profitable MEV Bot Gets Hacked

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-21

Introduzione

A well-known and highly profitable Ethereum MEV Bot, Jaredfromsubway.eth, suffered a sophisticated on-chain attack this Saturday, losing over $7.5 million. Analysis by Blockaid and others reveals this was not a conventional phishing or smart contract exploit, but a targeted "counter-MEV honeypot attack." The attacker meticulously laid a trap over several weeks, deploying 66 fake token contracts and liquidity pools disguised as major assets like WETH and USDC. These pools created the illusion of arbitrage opportunities. The MEV Bot's automated system detected these signals, executed trades, and in the process, granted approval permissions to attacker-controlled contracts. These approvals were not revoked, creating a persistent vulnerability. The attacker then exploited this in a single transaction, draining the bot's ETH, USDC, and USDT holdings. Jaredfromsubway.eth is notorious as one of Ethereum's most active and profitable MEV Bots, primarily known for executing "sandwich attacks" to profit from transaction slippage. Estimates suggest it has earned tens of millions in MEV revenue. The incident highlights escalating crypto security threats, demonstrating that even top-tier automated "predators" are vulnerable to novel, logic-based attacks designed to exploit their own operational rules. Following the hack, an unverified X account impersonating Jaredfromsubway.eth emerged, falsely offering a bounty for the return of funds, prompting developer warnings for users to stay vig...

By Azuma(@azuma_eth)

Jaredfromsubway.eth, a well-known MEV Bot address long active on the Ethereum network, was targeted in a highly specific on-chain attack on Saturday, resulting in losses exceeding $7.5 million.

Investigations by Blockaid and several on-chain analytics firms revealed that this incident was not a traditional phishing attack or smart contract exploit, but rather a "counter-MEV honeypot attack" specifically designed to exploit the operational logic of MEV Bots.

Over the preceding weeks, the attacker systematically deployed 66 counterfeit token contracts and fake liquidity pools. These assets were meticulously disguised on-chain as major stable assets like WETH, USDC, and USDT, creating seemingly genuine arbitrage trading pathways.

The attack chain unfolded as follows — fake liquidity pools generated signals of "exploitable price gaps"; the MEV bot automatically identified the arbitrage opportunity and executed a trade; during the transaction, the robot granted authorization to an auxiliary contract controlled by the attacker; this authorization was not revoked promptly, leading to persistent exposure of permissions; finally, the attacker triggered a pre-embedded backdoor logic in a single transaction, directly transferring assets such as ETH, USDC, and USDT held by the MEV bot's address.

On-chain data shows that the total scale of assets stolen from Jaredfromsubway.eth this time has exceeded $7.5 million. The attacker subsequently split and transferred some of the assets, further dispersing the fund flow through mixing tools.

Who is Jaredfromsubway.eth? The Most Notorious MEV Bot Address

The reason this attack is so notable now is that the victim, Jaredfromsubway.eth, is itself the most active, most profitable, and most notorious MEV Bot on the Ethereum network (perhaps without even needing 'one of').

"MEV attacks" are essentially a category of on-chain arbitrage behaviors centered around "transaction ordering rights." In the Ethereum network, transactions wait in the mempool to be included in a block before they are confirmed. Block builders or searchers can adjust transaction order, insert transactions, or rearrange transactions within a block to extract additional profits.

The most typical attack type is the "Sandwich Attack"— the attacker inserts a buy order before and a sell order after a user's transaction, profiting from price slippage within a short timeframe. This behavior is extremely common in high-liquidity DeFi trading pairs and constitutes one of the most fundamental profit models within the MEV ecosystem.

Jaredfromsubway.eth is precisely the most representative automated executor of this mechanism. Unlike traditional "single-point arbitrage bots," this MEV Bot operates more like a highly industrialized MEV execution system. It continuously monitors unconfirmed transactions in the mempool, identifies in real-time transaction paths vulnerable to sandwiching, and within an extremely short time window, completes transaction construction, gas bidding, and order insertion, systematically capturing slippage profits.

Data from Cointelegraph Research shows that between November 2024 and October 2025, approximately 60,000 to 90,000 sandwich attacks occurred monthly on the Ethereum network, with about 70% related to Jaredfromsubway.eth's strategy system.

In May this year, when Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin exchanged 26,544 DigitalBits (XDB), his transaction was also precisely targeted and sandwiched by Jaredfromsubway.eth.

There is no official statistic on Jaredfromsubway.eth's historical revenue, but conservative estimates suggest that the address has accumulated tens of millions of dollars in MEV profits during its active periods. During some peak periods, its single-day profits could reach hundreds of thousands of dollars, and it consistently appeared at the top of Ethereum MEV rankings for a long time.

Crypto Security Threats Escalate: Even Top Predators Are Not Safe

While some may marvel at the "hunter finally getting hunted," the hacking of Jaredfromsubway.eth also rings an alarm bell for cryptocurrency risks once again.

In past perceptions, MEV Bots like Jaredfromsubway.eth belonged to the "predator" side of the on-chain ecosystem — they continuously capture slippage and arbitrage opportunities in user transactions through automated strategies, inherently occupying an advantageous position, and could even be considered a representative class of attackers in the crypto market.

But this time, it became the target of design, inducement, and eventual harvesting. Moreover, the attacker did not choose a traditional vulnerability exploitation path. Instead, they constructed a long-running "behavioral trap," allowing the MEV Bot's automated system to proceed step by step towards erroneous decisions while fully complying with its own rules.

It must be admitted that even participants like Jaredfromsubway.eth, who were once most adept at "exploiting the rules," are now exposed to more multidimensional attack surfaces.

It is also worth noting that after the Jaredfromsubway.eth hack, an unknown account on X with 94,000 followers changed its name to Jaredfromsubway.eth and falsely claimed it would "offer a $1 million bounty for the full return of all funds."

Several developers issued risk warnings regarding this, emphasizing that the account is not an official Jaredfromsubway.eth account (the MEV Bot team has no official account) and that it cannot be ruled out that this account might be used for scams in the future. Users are urged to remain highly vigilant.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat type of attack was the Jaredfromsubway.eth MEV bot a victim of?

AIt was a victim of a 'counter-MEV honeypot attack', a targeted attack designed to exploit the behavioral logic of MEV bots, not a traditional phishing or smart contract exploit.

QWho is Jaredfromsubway.eth and what is it known for in the Ethereum ecosystem?

AJaredfromsubway.eth is one of the most active, profitable, and notorious MEV bots on the Ethereum network. It is particularly known for executing 'sandwich attacks' to capture slippage profits from user transactions.

QWhat was the estimated total loss for Jaredfromsubway.eth in this attack?

AThe estimated total loss for Jaredfromsubway.eth in this attack was over $7.5 million in assets like ETH, USDC, and USDT.

QWhat specific attack method was used to set up the trap for the MEV bot?

AThe attackers deployed 66 fake token contracts and fake liquidity pools over several weeks. These mimicked mainstream assets like WETH, USDC, and USDT to create seemingly profitable arbitrage opportunities, ultimately tricking the bot into granting permissions that were later exploited.

QWhat did the impersonator account on X (formerly Twitter) falsely claim after the attack?

AAn impersonator account on X, with the name changed to Jaredfromsubway.eth, falsely claimed it would offer a '$1 million bounty for the full return of all funds'.

Letture associate

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

Bank of America has quietly made leadership appointments to accelerate its digital asset strategy, sparking discussion about a potential large-scale migration of bank deposits to stablecoins. Reports highlighted the bank naming Sonali Theisen, Kevin Milsom, and Adam Dixon to lead its global digital asset and AI platform, focusing on stablecoins, tokenized deposits, custody, and crypto settlement. This move revived a claim that $6 trillion in bank deposits could flow into stablecoins, a figure originally cited by Bank of America's CEO Brian Moynihan in January. However, he conditioned this shift on stablecoins being allowed to pay interest—a feature not permitted under the current GENIUS Act. The legislation's final rules are delayed, pushing its effective date to January 2027. Major banks are not waiting. JPMorgan and Citigroup are already piloting tokenized deposit services, and a consortium including Bank of America is building a shared tokenized deposit network targeting a 2027 launch. While some, like Pacemakers.io's Alessandro Hatami, remain skeptical of rapid bank collaboration, data shows significant institutional adoption. Stablecoin settlement volume hit $33 trillion in 2025, and analysts project the market could surpass $1 trillion by 2026. Despite a recent dip in crypto prices and stablecoin supply, the institutional push for real-world use cases continues. The race is on for January 2027, when the GENIUS Act takes effect, potentially reshaping the competition between traditional finance and digital assets.

Foresight News19 min fa

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

Foresight News19 min fa

US Treasury Secretary Bement Claims: The US Will Soon Control 80% of Global Computing Power

U.S. Treasury Secretary Ben Sent proclaimed that America is poised to control 80% of the world's computing power, positioning compute dominance as a core pillar of U.S. economic strategy. Speaking on the Mike Rowe show, he stated the U.S. currently holds 50-60% of global compute share, with expectations to reach 80% soon. He framed this as a strategic competition the U.S. "cannot afford to lose," warning that a rival's lead would grant "unacceptable" strategic leverage, while asserting a current one-year AI lead. This high-level policy endorsement is seen as a direct boost for AI infrastructure investment, benefiting chipmakers like NVIDIA and cloud providers' capex cycles. Sent positioned AI compute, semiconductors, and quantum computing as three pillars of national economic strength and security. He defended AI's societal impact, citing historical tech shifts, and argued AI empowers small businesses without causing net job loss so far. He highlighted government efforts to deepen public-private AI cybersecurity cooperation. For investors, the statement signals sustained U.S. policy support for AI infrastructure. However, analysts urge caution, noting "compute share" lacks a standard public metric; the 80% figure is a forecast, not audited data. They recommend focusing on tangible indicators like physical capacity expansion and power infrastructure, with future semiconductor and cloud reports providing key verification data.

marsbit31 min fa

US Treasury Secretary Bement Claims: The US Will Soon Control 80% of Global Computing Power

marsbit31 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片