The Bustle Belongs to the 'Epsteins', Saylor Just Wants to Hoard Coins

比推Pubblicato 2026-02-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-02

Introduzione

The article discusses Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy (now Strategy), in the context of the recently released Epstein documents. Saylor was mentioned in a 2010 email from Epstein's PR agent, Peggy Siegal, who described him as a socially awkward "zombie-like" figure who was difficult to engage with at a high-society dinner party. This perceived social ineptitude, a liability in elite circles, is presented as a key strength in his role as a Bitcoin maximalist. Saylor’s company is the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, with 712,647 BTC purchased at an average cost of $76,037. Despite recent market volatility pushing Bitcoin below his average buy price and causing a 60% drop in his company's stock, Saylor remains unwavering. His strategy is simple and relentless: buy Bitcoin consistently and never sell, a philosophy he summarizes as "More Orange." The piece argues that the very traits that made him an outsider in social settings—being "boring," unemotional, and immune to external noise—are the same traits that make him uniquely suited to his long-term, single-minded accumulation strategy. While cautioning that his corporate financial tools are not available to the average investor, the article concludes that in a noisy market, a "boring" and disciplined approach is often the most profitable, contrasting Saylor's current success with the downfall of many involved in the Epstein scandal.

Author: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: The Bustle Belongs to the 'Epsteins', Saylor Just Wants to Hoard Coins


There's a reason why one person can hoard 710,000 Bitcoins.

Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice released documents related to the Epstein case, spanning 3 million pages. Politicians, billionaires, celebrities—a string of names are popping up from these materials. And the founder of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), Michael Saylor, is also in there.

However, Saylor's appearance is a bit special; he was at the table that was looked down upon.

From the currently disclosed information, in 2010, Epstein's publicist Peggy Siegal once complained in a private email:

"There's a guy named Saylor who spent twenty-five thousand dollars on a dinner ticket, and I was responsible for socializing with him. But this guy was completely unapproachable, like a drugged zombie. I couldn't stand it and ran away halfway through."

Peggy's main job is as a Hollywood movie publicist, and her side hustle is helping Epstein organize dinners—essentially scouting for wealthy people to pull into the circle.

Socializing with the rich, helping them meet the right people at parties and dinners, ensuring they have a good time and spend their money comfortably. Having been in the business for decades, she's按理说 seen all kinds of billionaires.

But Saylor, she couldn't handle.

The reason wasn't that he had character flaws; it was that he was too dull. He paid to get in, sat there unable to chat, showed no interest in socializing at all.

Peggy's exact words were, "I don't even know if I can take his money, couldn't figure out how to handle him... He has no personality, completely ignorant of social etiquette."

Now that the Epstein case has exploded, people on the list are busy distancing themselves. Saylor, on the other hand, never managed to squeeze in back then.

Being overly boring and reclusive became a protective shield.

But when this "boredom" is placed in a different context, it's another story.

Saylor's company, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), is the publicly traded company holding the most Bitcoin globally. This January, when Bitcoin was still fluctuating around $90,000, they bought over 37,000 more Bitcoins, spending $3.5 billion.

Buying almost every week, rain or shine.

As of now, Strategy holds 712,647 Bitcoins, with an average cost of $76,037. And today, Bitcoin just fell below $76,000, meaning Saylor's position is right on the break-even line.

The market fear index hit a 20-week high, and the crypto world is filled with cries of despair. Strategy's stock price has also dropped 60% from its peak.

But Saylor tweeted "More Orange," implying he'll keep buying next week.

Back then, Peggy called him a zombie. Looking at it now, hoarding coins might just be a job for zombies.

No explanations, no timing the market, no getting off the ride. Feeling nothing from the outside world, and feeling good about oneself.

And while Peggy complained back then about not knowing how to help him spend money, Saylor has clearly found his way to spend it now: buying Bitcoin, all of it.

From that email, Saylor was an outsider in the world of fame and fortune. He couldn't sit still, couldn't chat, spent a night as if he never came. But such people are反而 steady in trading.

No need to socialize, no need to build relationships, no need to guess what others are thinking. Just focus on one thing, buy every week, and never sell.

Dull, uninteresting, insensitive to the outside world... These traits are flaws in social settings, but when it comes to hoarding coins, they might be a talent.

After this news spread, classic memes have already appeared on Twitter, roughly meaning that Saylor has no interest in underage girls but is extremely obsessed with underage assets (referring to young/early Bitcoin).

From a hindsight perspective, this exposure has, to some extent, also built a positive image for Saylor.

After the Epstein case broke out in 2019, Peggy, the publicist, had all her contracts canceled by clients like Netflix and FX, which basically ended her PR career; meanwhile, Saylor is now one of the world's largest Bitcoin holders.

The rejected one is still buying coins; the one who rejected him is already out of the game.

But to be fair, Saylor's current situation isn't that easy either.

The new Fed Chairman Warsh is hawkish, and the market expects he won't aggressively cut interest rates after taking office. Once interest rate expectations change, all kinds of assets worldwide come under pressure collectively.

Gold fell, silver fell, and Bitcoin fell even harder.

Coupled with tariff friction and tense U.S.-Europe relations, capital is starting to flow towards traditional safe-haven assets. The narrative of Bitcoin as "digital gold" is gradually fading.

If Bitcoin continues to fall, Strategy's ability to raise funds by issuing new shares will weaken, and the flywheel of coin-stock rotation could turn into a death spiral.

But Saylor really doesn't seem to care about any of this; this might be the other side of "boredom."

Ordinary investors can't do what Saylor does, not because they lack money, but because they are too "normal." Normal people read news, look at K-lines, see what others say. When the fear index soars, their hands start to itch, and their hearts start to ache.

Making decisions every day, each decision consuming willpower.

But in Saylor's strategy, there seems to be no "decision-making"环节. Buying is the only action; not selling is the only principle.

In his own words: "Bitcoin is the best asset ever invented by humanity, why would I sell?"

You can call this faith, or you can call it obsession. But from an execution perspective, the biggest advantage of this system is:

It doesn't require you to be smart; it only requires you to be boring.

Of course, this is not advice to imitate him. Saylor's底气 comes from being a publicly traded company—he can issue stock, borrow money. Ordinary people don't have these;模仿 his approach will most likely only lead to losses.

But there is one thing that might be worth learning from.

In investing, "fun" is often the source of losses.

Frequent trading, chasing hot trends, following news, using leverage... these behaviors that make investing "fun" are precisely the enemies of returns.

And the strategies that truly make money are often so boring they make people want to sleep.

Saylor's case is a bit extreme, but the logic holds. In a market full of noise, "boredom" might be the rarest ability.

Those who were socially adept at the parties back then are now either distancing themselves, under investigation, or have completely disappeared.

Perhaps, hoarding coins and being a person share the same principle:

Don't linger in lively places; boring things are worth doing long-term.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7608011

Domande pertinenti

QWhy was Michael Saylor described as a 'zombie on drugs' in the context of the Epstein scandal?

AHe was described that way by Epstein's PR Peggy Siegal because he was extremely dull, unable to engage in conversation, and showed no interest in socializing at the dinner party he paid $25,000 to attend.

QHow many bitcoins does Saylor's company Strategy currently hold, and what is their average cost basis?

AStrategy currently holds 712,647 bitcoins with an average cost basis of $76,037.

QWhat is Saylor's investment strategy regarding Bitcoin according to the article?

AHis strategy is to buy Bitcoin almost every week without selling, following a simple principle of continuous accumulation regardless of market conditions.

QHow did the market conditions and new Fed Chair affect Bitcoin and Strategy's position?

AThe new Fed Chair's hawkish stance reduced expectations for aggressive rate cuts, putting pressure on assets like Bitcoin. Bitcoin's price briefly fell below Strategy's average cost, and the company's stock price declined by 60% from its peak.

QWhat broader investment lesson does the article draw from Saylor's approach?

AThe article suggests that in investing, 'boring' strategies—like consistent buying without frequent decisions—often outperform 'interesting' behaviors such as frequent trading, chasing trends, and using leverage, which are typically detrimental to returns.

Letture associate

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit42 min fa

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit42 min fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit47 min fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit47 min fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit47 min fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit47 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片