Thailand links crypto & carbon credits to derivatives market: Details

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-12

Introduzione

Thailand has officially integrated digital assets and carbon credits into its regulated derivatives market under the Derivatives Trading Act. This allows cryptocurrencies and carbon credits to serve as underlying assets for futures and options trading on the Thailand Futures Exchange, shifting their status from speculative instruments to regulated investment products. The move enables institutional investors to manage risk more effectively and supports market diversification. Stricter licensing and supervision rules are being implemented to ensure stability. This development is part of Thailand’s broader strategy to position itself as a digital economy leader in Southeast Asia, with plans to introduce Bitcoin ETFs by 2026. The policy follows years of regulatory evolution, including earlier exchange licensing, a ban on crypto payments, and recent tax incentives.

In a surprising turn of events, Thailand’s government has decided to officially include digital assets and carbon credits in its regulated derivatives market.

This means cryptocurrencies and carbon credits can now be used as reference products under the country’s Derivatives Trading Act.

With this decision, Thailand is moving away from treating crypto as just a speculative investment. Digital assets and carbon credits can now be used for futures and options trading on the Thailand Futures Exchange.

This allows large investors and institutions to trade them in a more serious and structured way, similar to gold or oil.

Execs weigh in...

Remarking on the same in the Bangkok Post, Nirun Fuwattananukul, chief executive of Binance TH, said,

“The move marks a watershed moment for the country’s capital markets. It sends a strong signal that Thailand is positioning itself as a forward-looking leader in Southeast Asia’s digital economy.”

By upgrading digital assets and carbon credits to official underlying assets, the government is giving the SEC more power to connect traditional finance with the digital economy.

Until now, most Thai investors could only trade crypto through spot trading, meaning they bought and held assets.

Under the new rules, the Thailand Futures Exchange can now offer products like Bitcoin [BTC] futures and options.

Benefits offered

This gives investors better tools to manage risk and protect themselves from sudden price drops. It also supports market growth, as crypto can now be part of diversified portfolios, with allocations of up to 5%.

At the same time, regulators are introducing strict safety rules. Crypto firms like Binance TH must meet higher licensing standards, and brokers will follow new supervision guidelines to prevent market instability.

According to Fuwattananukul, these changes turn crypto into a regulated asset class and prepare Thailand for future developments, including Bitcoin ETFs by 2026, bringing it closer to global financial hubs like New York and Hong Kong.

Thailand’s crypto journey from 2018 to 2026

Needless to say, Thailand’s current policy shift is the result of years of gradual change in how the country views digital assets. In 2018, the government introduced rules for crypto exchanges, creating the first licensing system.

By 2021, crypto trading had become extremely popular, with some people even using Bitcoin to buy luxury goods. To protect financial stability, the Bank of Thailand banned crypto payments in March 2022.

After this, Thailand adopted a balanced approach. It limited crypto as everyday money but encouraged it as an investment. The government introduced tax benefits, launched a regulatory sandbox in 2024, and allowed banks to enter the sector.

For example, Kasikorn Bank received a crypto custodian license and began offering digital services in 2025. Local projects like KUB, JFIN, and BAND also helped move the market beyond the crackdown period.

This push became a part of a wider plan to compete with global fintech hubs like Dubai and Singapore.

Additionally, a key incentive was also a capital gains tax exemption until 31st December 2029, for trades on approved platforms.

Thus, looking ahead, the launch of Bitcoin ETFs and carbon credit futures by 2026 could further strengthen Thailand’s role in the global digital economy.


Final Thoughts

  • Government support signals long-term commitment to digital finance, not short-term experimentation.
  • By allowing crypto futures and options, the country is shifting digital assets from speculation to serious, regulated investment tools.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two new asset classes that Thailand has officially included in its regulated derivatives market?

ADigital assets (cryptocurrencies) and carbon credits.

QAccording to Binance TH's CEO, what does this move signal about Thailand's position in the region?

AIt signals that Thailand is positioning itself as a forward-looking leader in Southeast Asia's digital economy.

QWhat new type of product can the Thailand Futures Exchange now offer under the new rules?

AThe Thailand Futures Exchange can now offer products like Bitcoin (BTC) futures and options.

QWhat was a key regulatory action the Bank of Thailand took in March 2022 regarding cryptocurrency?

AThe Bank of Thailand banned the use of cryptocurrencies for payments to protect financial stability.

QUntil what date is there a capital gains tax exemption for trades on approved crypto platforms in Thailand?

AThe capital gains tax exemption is in effect until 31st December 2029.

Letture associate

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit3 h fa

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit3 h fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手4 h fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手4 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit4 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit4 h fa

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手4 h fa

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片