Tether grows as crypto market shrinks in Q4, report shows

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-04

Introduzione

Despite a sharp contraction in the broader cryptocurrency market in Q4 2025, with total market capitalization falling from approximately $3.9 trillion to $2.6 trillion, Tether (USD₮) experienced significant growth. Its circulating supply increased steadily, reaching around $109 billion by the end of the quarter, with net issuance exceeding $10 billion. This expansion reflects a shift in investor behavior toward capital preservation and de-risking rather than exiting the crypto ecosystem entirely. Tether’s substantial holdings of U.S. Treasuries, totaling $141.6 billion, reinforced confidence during market stress. The accumulation of stablecoins suggests that investors are poised to redeploy capital once market conditions stabilize, potentially supporting future liquidity and recovery.

Tether expanded its footprint in the final quarter of 2025 even as the broader cryptocurrency market entered a sharp contraction. This underscores the stablecoin’s role as a defensive asset during periods of heightened volatility.

According to Tether’s Q4 market report, the total cryptocurrency market capitalization fell by roughly one-third over the quarter. It slid from around $3.9 trillion at the end of September to about $2.6 trillion by December.

The drawdown capped a year marked by tightening financial conditions, fading risk appetite, and persistent selling pressure across major digital assets.

Against that backdrop, Tether moved in the opposite direction. USD₮’s circulating supply climbed steadily through the quarter, ending Q4 at approximately $109 billion.

That figure represents one of the strongest quarterly expansions for the stablecoin in 2025 and a sharp contrast to the contraction seen across spot crypto markets.

Tether capital rotation favors stability over risk

Rather than signaling fresh speculative inflows, the report suggests USD₮’s growth reflected a shift in capital allocation. As prices fell and volatility increased, market participants appeared to rotate funds into stablecoins rather than exit the crypto ecosystem entirely.

Net issuance of USD₮ exceeded $10 billion during Q4, indicating sustained demand for dollar-denominated liquidity.

This pattern aligns with previous market downturns, where stablecoins tend to absorb capital as traders reduce exposure to volatile assets while maintaining on-chain flexibility.

The divergence between market cap contraction and stablecoin growth highlights a broader behavioral trend: investors were de-risking, not disengaging.

Capital remained on-chain, but it increasingly sought shelter in instruments designed to preserve value rather than generate upside.

Treasuries underpin confidence in USD₮

Tether’s report also emphasized the composition of its reserves, which remain heavily weighted toward short-term U.S.

Treasuries and cash equivalents. The report shows that Tethers holds $141.6bn in U.S. Treasuries, making it the 7th largest buyer of U.S. Treasuries in 2025, ahead of Taiwan and South Korea.

This reserve structure has become central to USD₮’s positioning during market stress, as it reinforces confidence in the stablecoin’s liquidity and redemption capacity.

What stablecoin growth signals for the market

The expansion of USD₮ during a broad market downturn carries important implications.

Historically, rising stablecoin balances during periods of declining prices have often preceded renewed trading activity once conditions stabilize, as sidelined capital can be rapidly redeployed.

The accumulation of stablecoins suggests that investors are waiting for clearer macro or market signals before re-entering higher-risk positions.

Final Thoughts

  • USD₮ supply growth in Q4 points to capital preservation rather than renewed risk-taking, as crypto markets declined.
  • Rising stablecoin balances may set the stage for future liquidity, but timing a broader recovery remains uncertain.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat happened to Tether's circulating supply in Q4 2025 while the broader crypto market was contracting?

ATether's circulating supply grew steadily, ending Q4 at approximately $109 billion, which was one of its strongest quarterly expansions in 2025.

QHow much did the total cryptocurrency market capitalization fall by in Q4 2025, according to Tether's report?

AThe total cryptocurrency market capitalization fell by roughly one-third, from around $3.9 trillion at the end of September to about $2.6 trillion by December.

QWhat does the report suggest was the primary reason for the growth of USD₮ during the market downturn?

AThe report suggests that USD₮'s growth reflected a shift in capital allocation, with market participants rotating funds into stablecoins for stability rather than exiting the crypto ecosystem entirely.

QWhat is the significance of Tether holding $141.6 billion in U.S. Treasuries, as mentioned in the report?

AThis large holding of U.S. Treasuries and cash equivalents reinforces confidence in USD₮'s liquidity and redemption capacity, making Tether the 7th largest buyer of U.S. Treasuries in 2025.

QWhat broader market implication does the accumulation of stablecoins during a downturn historically signal?

AHistorically, rising stablecoin balances during declining prices have often preceded renewed trading activity once conditions stabilize, as sidelined capital can be rapidly redeployed into higher-risk positions.

Letture associate

How to Conduct Deep Research Using Claude's Dynamic Workflows

The article "How to Use Claude's Dynamic Workflows for Deep Research" discusses overcoming the pitfalls of technical research, where both humans and AI can get overwhelmed by information, leading to vague conclusions. It introduces Claude Code's new "Dynamic Workflows" feature, which automatically designs and executes task-specific workflows before starting a task, unlike simpler "planning modes." This approach incorporates validation, result convergence, and adversarial verification from the outset. The core of Dynamic Workflows is six predefined scheduling patterns that address how to decompose tasks and synthesize results: 1. **Classify-and-Act (Routing):** An agent classifies the task and routes it to the most suitable specialist agent for execution. It's precise and efficient but struggles with ambiguous tasks. 2. **Fan-out & Merge:** The task is split into parallel, independent subtasks whose results are later merged. It's fast and isolates contexts but is more expensive and challenging to synthesize. 3. **Adversarial Verification:** Multiple "challenger" agents critique a worker agent's conclusion, requiring majority approval. This counters confirmation bias and self-assessment errors but relies on verifiable facts. 4. **Generate & Filter:** Multiple agents generate many candidate solutions, which are then filtered against a rubric to output only the best. It fosters diversity but depends heavily on the filter's quality. 5. **Tournament:** Multiple agents compete on the same task, with pairwise comparisons eliminating contestants over rounds to select the best. This offers stable relative judgment but is complex. 6. **Loop:** An agent iteratively attempts a task, learning from errors and adjusting until a stop condition is met. It handles tasks with unknown scope but risks infinite loops without proper design. The author compares their own custom deep-research system, which involved multi-agent analysis and deduplication but lacked goal-oriented convergence, to Claude's built-in workflow. The official workflow adds critical layers: initial problem decomposition, credibility assessment of sources, cross-agent voting to delete weak conclusions (not just averaging), and output tightly focused on the user's original goals and actionable recommendations. This structurally addresses common AI issues like goal drift, premature stopping, context pollution, and output bias. In summary, Dynamic Workflows represent a shift from smarter single conversations to a structured research process, compressing what used to require many dialogues into 3-4 interactions, albeit at higher token cost. The author notes remaining challenges for their specific domain (blockchain research): the need for fact-based verification over official documentation, depth in truly novel interdisciplinary thinking, the practical validation of proposed solutions, and tailoring information density to the audience.

marsbit6 min fa

How to Conduct Deep Research Using Claude's Dynamic Workflows

marsbit6 min fa

When LPs Teach Me Investment with Doubao: A Self-Narrative of a Private Equity GP Switching Careers

When LPs Use Doubao to Teach Investing: A Transition Story of a Private Equity GP AI is making life increasingly difficult for small private equity fund managers, as a former GP of an offshore dollar fund reveals. The fund, managing tens of millions in US stocks, outperformed the Nasdaq but struggled with fundraising. Its traditional Cayman SPC/BVI structure failed to attract major Asian LPs, who now prefer Hong Kong LPF or Singapore VCC frameworks. The rise of AI-powered quantitative strategies has further squeezed the space for funds like his, which relied on subjective, discretionary investing. AI tools have leveled the information playing field, empowering LPs—often high-net-worth individuals, entrepreneurs, or family offices—to analyze investments themselves using chatbots like Doubao. This has eroded trust in GPs' expertise, leading to more frequent challenges over investment decisions and even withdrawals, especially during market rallies when retail investors sometimes outperform funds. Friction arises not necessarily from AI's capabilities but from how LPs use it. Many rely on conversational AI for validation rather than rigorous analysis, sometimes receiving misleading or hallucinated advice. While AI democratizes research, effective investing still requires discerning real insight from plausible-sounding output. Ultimately, AI is unlikely to fully replace GPs. Asset management remains a trust-based service. However, the industry must adapt. The future may see "human私募" (private equity) learning from AI and focusing more on providing value beyond pure analysis—perhaps by mastering the emotional intelligence and trust-building that machines cannot replicate.

Odaily星球日报34 min fa

When LPs Teach Me Investment with Doubao: A Self-Narrative of a Private Equity GP Switching Careers

Odaily星球日报34 min fa

AI Leads to Layoffs? Research Shows AI Is More Expensive Than the People It Replaces

Title: AI Layoffs? Research Shows AI is More Expensive Than the Workers It Replaces. This year, nearly 50,000 employees have been laid off due to AI, with companies initially believing AI could replace human jobs. However, recent findings indicate that the actual operational costs of AI often exceed the expense of the human labor it was meant to replace. Examples include Uber exhausting its annual AI budget in just four months, Microsoft cutting Claude Code licenses due to high costs, and an Anthropic employee incurring $150,000 in API usage in a single month. A CloudZero survey reveals that 45% of enterprises spend over $100,000 monthly on AI, yet only 8% of S&P 500 companies report any AI-related revenue, and half struggle to measure ROI. Analyst Scott Galloway predicts a shift toward cheaper Chinese AI models, which are 10 to 30 times more affordable than American counterparts. Data shows Chinese models' usage among developers surged from 1% in 2024 to over 60% by mid-2026, with 80% of U.S. AI startups adopting them. This trend may prompt regulatory responses, such as potential restrictions from the Trump administration.

marsbit47 min fa

AI Leads to Layoffs? Research Shows AI Is More Expensive Than the People It Replaces

marsbit47 min fa

Wang Chuan: After Investing in Storage Stocks and Seeing a Thirty-Fold Return, How to Remain Unanxious (Part 7) - A Quarter-Century Cycle

Wang Chuan: Reflections on Investment Anxiety and Market Cycles After Observing a 30x Gain in a Storage Stock (Part 7) – A Quarter-Century Cycle This article examines the cyclical nature and inherent risks in technology hardware investments, using the storage and semiconductor sectors as examples. It criticizes the misleading practice of "annualized" Net Dollar Retention (NDR) rates, where short-term growth is extrapolated unrealistically. A key concept explored is "reflexivity" – demand driven by panic, exploration, and liquidity during market booms, which can vanish just as quickly when conditions reverse. This reflexivity exists both in product demand and among speculative stock buyers, creating powerful feedback loops that inflate prices during upturns and exacerbate crashes during downturns. The author highlights a major risk for hardware sectors: unlike assets with defined cycles (e.g., Bitcoin's halving), there's no guarantee of a swift recovery post-crash. Companies like Micron, Intel, and Cisco took roughly a quarter-century to surpass their 2000 highs, enduring drawdowns exceeding 80%. This is attributed to the "bullwhip effect" in supply chains, where demand collapses instantly but过剩产能 persists, and a migration of narrative-driven capital. High-valuation stories吸引 speculative funds during growth phases, but these funds quickly depart for the next hot narrative once growth slows, leaving behind stronger companies with much lower valuations. The piece warns of dangerous mental models formed during bull markets: 1) equating current strong demand with perpetual high growth, and 2) believing that making fast, large profits is easy. Citing巴菲特, the author notes that easy money undermines rationality, likening speculators to Cinderella at a ball with a clock that has no hands. The current phase presents an asymmetric risk-reward scenario: potential for further gains exists, but the downside risk is an 80%+ drawdown and a multi-decade wait for breakeven, which reflexive speculators cannot tolerate. The hypothetical investor "老王" (Lao Wang), who achieved a 30x return, is used to illustrate potential pitfalls. Leverage could lead to a wipeout during a sharp correction. Even without leverage, ingrained beliefs in easy money would likely lead him to double down after losses, expecting a quick rebound. Instead, he might face a protracted decline, depleting his resources through frantic trading as the high-growth narrative fades. The conclusion references Schopenhauer, comparing those who have seen multiple market cycles to an audience seeing the same magic trick repeatedly—once the illusion is understood, its power is gone.

marsbit56 min fa

Wang Chuan: After Investing in Storage Stocks and Seeing a Thirty-Fold Return, How to Remain Unanxious (Part 7) - A Quarter-Century Cycle

marsbit56 min fa

US Stocks Too Expensive? This Top CIO Scoured the Globe and Found 5 Stocks More Attractive Than NVIDIA

Summary: Main Street Research CIO James Demmert maintains his bullish 8,100 target for the S&P 500 but argues that greater opportunities now lie overseas. He identifies five international stocks with superior valuations poised to benefit from the AI revolution, suggesting international markets will outperform the US for years. Key Recommendations: 1. **ASML (Netherlands):** A foundational chip manufacturing technology provider, offering crucial AI exposure and geographic diversification. Demmert's top long-term pick. 2. **HSBC (UK/Asia):** A global bank with a 9x P/E ratio, better growth prospects than US peers like JPMorgan, and strong Asian presence. 3. **Siemens Energy (Germany):** A direct play on global power grid expansion driven by AI, crypto, and EV electricity demand. 4. **BHP Group (Australia):** A "hidden AI play" and "second derivative" of the trend due to massive copper demand for data centers. Trades at a 16x P/E. 5. **AstraZeneca (UK):** An undervalued healthcare stock with a strong pipeline (18x P/E, >20% growth), expected to benefit from AI's impact on medicine. Core Thesis: International outperformance is driven by both attractive valuations and a major policy shift. While the US tightens fiscal policy, Europe and Japan are launching unprecedented stimulus, reigniting growth. Demmert recommends allocating 45% of a portfolio internationally, citing excessive US investor conservatism as a key mistake.

marsbit1 h fa

US Stocks Too Expensive? This Top CIO Scoured the Globe and Found 5 Stocks More Attractive Than NVIDIA

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片