Tether-backed Northern Data sold mining firm to Tether execs: FT

cointelegraphPubblicato 2025-12-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-22

Introduzione

Northern Data, a Tether-backed data center operator, sold its Bitcoin mining business, Peak Mining, for up to $200 million to three companies run by Tether executives, including its co-founder and CEO. The sale occurred just before Rumble, a video-sharing platform in which Tether holds a major stake, agreed to acquire Northern Data. This is the second attempt to sell the mining unit to a Tether-linked entity. Northern Data is under investigation in Europe for suspected tax fraud and has a complex financial relationship with Tether, including a €610 million loan. The sale highlights Tether's expanding interests beyond stablecoins into mining, AI, and other ventures.

The Tether-backed data centre operator Northern Data reportedly sold its Bitcoin mining business, Peak Mining, to three companies run by Tether executives.

Northern Data was sold for up to $200 million to Highland Group Mining, Appalachian Energy, and an Alberta-based company, run by Giancarlo Devasini, Tether co-founder and chair, and its CEO, Paolo Ardoino, the Financial Times reported on Friday.

Filings reportedly show that Highland Group’s directors are Devasini and Ardoino, and the sole director of the Alberta company is Devasini, while it remains unclear who runs Delaware-based Appalachian Energy.

Northern Data initially announced the Peak Mining divestment in November, but did not identify the buyers, as it was not required by German regulators.

The deal also happened just before video-sharing platform Rumble, in which Tether holds nearly a 50% stake, agreed to acquire Northern Data.

*Tether’s complex web of financial ties. Source:* *The Financial Times*

Web of complex financial ties

It is also the second attempt to sell Peak Mining to a Devasini-controlled company. The first deal announced in August was with Elektron Energy for $235 million, but it fell through amid whistleblower allegations.

Northern Data faces investigation by European prosecutors for suspected tax fraud, and its offices were raided in September.

Related: Tether deepens AI bet, backs Italian firm’s humanoid robots

Tether has also agreed on a $100 million advertising deal with Rumble and plans to buy $150 million worth of GPU services from it as it delves deeper into Bitcoin mining.

Northern Data also currently has a 610 million euro ($715 million) loan from Tether.

The stablecoin issuer will receive half of the loan balance in Rumble stock as part of the acquisition, with the rest paid in the form of a new loan from Tether to Rumble, secured against Northern Data assets, the FT reported.

Tether branching out from stablecoins

Tether remains the world’s dominant player in the stablecoin sector with a 60% market share and $187 billion in circulating supply of USDT.

In addition to Bitcoin mining, AI, and video-sharing platforms, it is also eyeing sports teams.

On December 12, Tether launched a $1.1 billion bid to acquire the Italian professional soccer club, Juventus Football Club, but it was rejected by the club’s owners.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the name of the Bitcoin mining business sold by Northern Data, and to whom was it sold?

ANorthern Data sold its Bitcoin mining business, Peak Mining, to three companies run by Tether executives: Highland Group Mining, Appalachian Energy, and an Alberta-based company.

QWho are the key Tether executives involved in the purchase of Peak Mining, according to the Financial Times report?

AThe key Tether executives involved are Giancarlo Devasini, Tether's co-founder and chair, and its CEO, Paolo Ardoino. Devasini is a director of Highland Group and the sole director of the Alberta company.

QWhat significant event happened just before Rumble agreed to acquire Northern Data?

AJust before Rumble agreed to acquire Northern Data, the deal to sell Peak Mining to the Tether executives' companies took place.

QBesides stablecoins, what other industries is Tether investing in, as mentioned in the article?

ATether is investing in Bitcoin mining, artificial intelligence (AI), video-sharing platforms (through its stake in Rumble), and has also made a bid to acquire the Italian soccer club Juventus.

QWhat is the nature of the financial relationship between Tether and Northern Data beyond the recent sale?

ANorthern Data currently has a 610 million euro ($715 million) loan from Tether. As part of Rumble's acquisition of Northern Data, Tether will receive half of this loan balance in Rumble stock, with the rest paid as a new loan from Tether to Rumble, secured against Northern Data's assets.

Letture associate

Introducing: Market Compass

Glassnode introduces Market Compass, a dashboard providing a unified view of Bitcoin market conditions. It consolidates thousands of on-chain and market metrics into seven "lenses." Four forward-looking lenses (Macro, Capital Flows, Investor Behavior, On-Chain Fundamentals) feed a headline composite score from 0 (Risk-Off) to 100 (Risk-On). Three standalone lenses (Cycle Position, Derivatives, Cross-Asset Rotation) describe the current market structure. In the current reading, the headline score is 14/100 (Risk-Off), indicating a defensive regime. The Macro lens is the weakest at 23, constrained by a strong US Dollar (DXY) trading above its 200-day average. While the other forward-looking lenses show moderate improvement from recent lows, the overall picture suggests bottom-fishing within an unturned market cycle. Key observations include stablecoin supply shrinking (reduced buying power), long-term holders absorbing supply, tepid on-chain demand, and a derivatives market coiled for a potential move. The tool is designed as a contextual map, not a direct trading signal, synthesizing complex data into a single coherent read.

insights.glassnode3 h fa

insights.glassnode3 h fa

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit4 h fa

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit4 h fa

Stratosphere, Pudgy Penguins and Streamex Host Founders Table VIP Dinner During ETHConf 2026 and NYC Tech Week

During ETHConf 2026 and NYC Tech Week, Stratosphere, Pudgy Penguins, and Streamex co-hosted an exclusive Founders Table VIP Dinner in New York City. The June 9th event assembled a select group of founders, C-level executives, investors, and institutional leaders from firms such as Citi, BitGo, Delphi Digital, and Pyth Network for private, agenda-free networking. The dinner aimed to foster natural conversations among key figures across digital assets, tech, AI, and traditional finance. Stratosphere contributed its extensive network, Pudgy Penguins added its strong consumer brand community, and Streamex provided expertise in tokenized commodities and institutional markets. Stratosphere CEO Hassan Shaikh highlighted the importance of such gatherings for discussing market trends, particularly commodity tokenization. The Founders Table series, which runs alongside major industry conferences, is designed to build high-quality, relationship-driven connections that are difficult to achieve on standard conference floors. Stratosphere positions itself as an ecosystem growth partner for leading tech and finance brands.

TheNewsCrypto6 h fa

Stratosphere, Pudgy Penguins and Streamex Host Founders Table VIP Dinner During ETHConf 2026 and NYC Tech Week

TheNewsCrypto6 h fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit7 h fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit7 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit9 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit9 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures