Telegram taps Lighter for 50x perps trading across crypto, stocks, and commodities: Details

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-04-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-04

Introduzione

Telegram has integrated Lighter, a decentralized exchange (DEX) specializing in perpetual trading, to power its native leveraged trading feature. Through the Wallet in Telegram, users can now trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, metals, and oil with up to 50x leverage. This integration, Telegram's largest with Lighter to date, could significantly boost trading volumes for the DEX by tapping into Telegram’s vast user base of over 150 million registered and 25 million active wallet users. The partnership arrives as Lighter faces a substantial decline in activity and revenue—weekly trading volumes dropped 89% from its November peak to $8B in April, while revenue fell 91% to $325K weekly. This downturn followed the end of LIT token farming after its December debut. The Telegram deal has already spurred a 30% price recovery for LIT in early April. If the integration drives renewed user activity, it may reverse Lighter’s declining metrics and support further token buybacks; otherwise, LIT could face renewed downward pressure.

Lighter, a DEX focused on perpetual (perps) trading, has been tapped to power Telegram’s native leveraged trading.

In a statement on the 2nd of April, Wallet in Telegram said that users on the privacy-focused messenger can now trade crypto, stocks, metals, and oil with up to 50x leverage.

The wallet has seen strong adoption with over 150 million registered users.

About 25 million of these users are considered active, especially in P2P transfers and fiat on-ramps, making Telegram a key crypto trading terminal. The messenger itself has over 1 billion users.

As such, the integration of Lighter could boost trading volumes on the DEX too. As it stands, this is the primary and largest Lighter integration to date.

For comparison, its rival Hyperliquid runs perps trading for Phantom, Rabby, MetaMask, and others. This fueled Hyperliquid’s initial adoption by sharing fees from trades routed by the apps.

Could Lighter benefit from a similar traction?

Will the deal boost Lighter’s trading activity?

The collaboration comes at a time when the demand for perpetual trading has exploded. At the market peak last October, the overall perp volume reached $350 billion and $25 billion in Open Interest (OI).

Despite the broader crypto rout in the past few months, perp volume still hovered around $150 billion.

However, Lighter’s trading activity has declined significantly. Especially after the LIT’s token debut at the end of last December, which ended the farming period. As a result, traders who were hunting for an airdrop migrated elsewhere to search for new opportunities.

Consequently, Lighter’s trading activity fell sharply after December. This decline has extended into Q1 2026, and there hasn’t been any meaningful recovery in Q2 as the broader crypto market remains subdued.

So far, the weekly perps volumes have fallen from a record $75B in November to about $8B in April—an 89% decline in trading activity.

The protocol’s revenue also went downwards. It dropped from a weekly average of $4M to $325K, translating to a 91% revenue crash.

It’s worth pointing out that the brief relief in February boosted activity and revenue. Ultimately, this fueled the buyback of LIT, the protocol’s native token.

If Telegram integration improves activity and revenue improve in April, then the recent 30% recovery rally could extend. Otherwise, a rejection at $1 and low activity could drag LIT back to $0.78 or below.

Final Summary

Telegram integration has fueled LIT’s recovery by 30% in early April.
Lighter DEX’s revenue crashed 91%, but renewed trading activity from Telegram could help reverse it and boost LIT buyback.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main partnership announced between Telegram and Lighter?

ATelegram has partnered with Lighter, a decentralized exchange (DEX), to power its native leveraged trading feature, allowing users to trade crypto, stocks, metals, and oil with up to 50x leverage.

QHow many active users does Wallet in Telegram have, and why is this significant?

AWallet in Telegram has about 25 million active users, which is significant because their activity in P2P transfers and fiat on-ramps makes Telegram a key crypto trading terminal, potentially boosting Lighter's trading volumes.

QWhat happened to Lighter's trading activity and revenue after its token debut in December?

ALighter's trading activity fell sharply after its LIT token debut in December, with weekly perps volumes declining by 89% from $75B in November to about $8B in April, and revenue crashing by 91% from a weekly average of $4M to $325K.

QHow did the Telegram integration affect LIT's token price in early April?

AThe Telegram integration fueled a 30% recovery rally for LIT's token price in early April.

QWhat is the potential future price movement for LIT depending on the success of the Telegram integration?

AIf the Telegram integration improves trading activity and revenue, the recent 30% recovery rally for LIT could extend. Otherwise, a rejection at $1 and low activity could drag LIT back to $0.78 or below.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit24 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit24 min fa

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit32 min fa

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit32 min fa

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News36 min fa

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News36 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit43 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit43 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit52 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit52 min fa

Trading

Spot