Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-11

Introduzione

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that Telegram will replace the TON Foundation as the core driver and largest validator of The Open Network (TON). Key initiatives include a sixfold reduction in transaction fees, performance upgrades, and improved developer tools within the next few weeks. This marks a strategic shift from Telegram merely providing user access to deeply integrating TON into its platform's core infrastructure. The goal is to transform Telegram's massive social traffic into sustainable on-chain activity. While viral mini-apps like Notcoin have demonstrated Telegram's ability to drive user adoption, TON aims to support frequent, low-value transactions inherent to social platforms—such as tipping, in-app payments, and game rewards. Ultra-low fees and sub-second finality (0.6 seconds) are crucial to making blockchain interactions seamless and nearly invisible within the Telegram user experience. However, Telegram's increased central role raises questions about network decentralization. Durov argues that Telegram's participation will attract more large validators, thereby enhancing decentralization. TON also offers high annual staking rewards (18.8%), aiming to retain capital within its ecosystem. The fundamental challenge for TON is no longer leveraging Telegram's user base, but becoming an indispensable, seamless infrastructure layer for Telegram's everyday applications—moving from an adjacent chain to an embedded utility.

Author | Asher(@Asher_ 0210)

On May 4th, Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced on platform X that TON network transaction fees have been reduced by 6 times, nearing zero. More crucially, he stated that Telegram will replace the TON Foundation, becoming the new core driving force of the TON network and its largest validator. TON's focus will now shift to technological advantages, including a new ton.org, new developer tools, and performance upgrades, with a timeframe of the next 2 to 3 weeks.

Telegram Founder: TON Fees Reduced by 6x, Telegram to Become Largest Validator

In the past, the relationship between TON and Telegram was more like a strong binding with weak leadership. Telegram provided the gateway, while the Foundation and community were responsible for advancement, with a layer of distance always between them. But this time, Telegram isn't just continuing to bring users to TON; it's beginning to enter more foundational positions such as validator, technical roadmap, and development tools. TON is no longer just a chain adjacent to the Telegram ecosystem but is being reintegrated into Telegram's product system.

TON Doesn't Lack a Gateway; It Lacks Turning the Gateway into Use Cases

Past market discussions about TON often revolved around Telegram's user scale. But for a public chain, having a gateway doesn't equal having an ecosystem, and having user reach doesn't equal having long-term usage. TON's unique aspect is its inherent attachment to a high-frequency social platform, where Mini Apps, wallets, channels, bots, games, and payments already exist within Telegram. This allows TON to avoid having to find users from scratch like most Layer1s. However, if these scenarios cannot solidify into sustained on-chain interactions, Telegram's traffic can only bring waves of short-term hype.

Projects like Notcoin and Dogs have proven that Telegram can quickly generate viral spreads. Simple gameplay combined with social relationship chains can indeed attract a large number of users into crypto applications in a short time. But such explosions come and go quickly. TG mini-games and airdrops can bring attention but can hardly alone sustain a long-term ecosystem.

Therefore, the fee reduction, speed increase, developer tools, and validator role emphasized by Pavel Durov this time point not to a single technological upgrade, but to TON addressing its most critical missing link—transforming Telegram's gateway into sustainable use cases. Only when fees are low enough, confirmation speeds are fast enough, and developer integration is simple enough can scenarios like channel tipping, Mini Apps tasks, game rewards, creator revenue, ad revenue sharing, bot calls, and group micropayments potentially evolve from product features into on-chain activities.

TON no longer needs to repeat the story of "backed by Telegram." What it truly needs to prove is whether the high-frequency behaviors within Telegram can be effectively borne by TON.

Fee Reduction and Speed Increase Aim to Enable Smaller, Higher-Frequency Transactions

The fee reduction by TON this time shouldn't be understood merely as cost optimization typical of public chains. Viewed within the context of Telegram, it actually solves the problem of whether small-amount, high-frequency interactions can become viable.

Most potential on-chain behaviors within Telegram are not large transfers but more fragmented daily operations. Individual transaction amounts are low, but occurrence frequency is high. If users have to perceive fees, wait for confirmations, and repeatedly handle wallet interactions with every button click, these scenarios can hardly truly take off.

Therefore, fee reduction and speed increase must be considered together. Fees approaching zero lower the usage barrier; reducing finality time to 0.6 seconds lowers the perception of waiting. For Telegram, the chain shouldn't become an extra layer perceived by users but should be hidden as much as possible behind product actions like sending messages, clicking buttons, and viewing balance changes.

Comparison of "Finality Time" Among Mainstream Public Chains

This also distinguishes TON from many other Layer1s. Its goal isn't solely to make DeFi trades faster or transfers cheaper; it aims to embed the chain into Telegram's daily use. Only when cost, waiting time, and wallet operations are minimized enough can TON potentially evolve from a Telegram-related public chain into the underlying network directly invoked by Telegram's application layer.

From Gateway to Validator, Telegram Begins Penetrating TON's Core

Telegram becoming TON's largest validator is the most significant step in this change. It means Telegram is no longer just providing TON with a gateway and brand endorsement but is entering the network's security and operational mechanisms. Previously, TON was driven by the Foundation and community, which offered greater openness but a relatively decentralized pace. Now, with Telegram directly involved, its products, wallet, Mini Apps, payments, and developer tools have the opportunity to be realigned.

Efficiency may increase, but controversy will also grow. Telegram replacing the TON Foundation as the main driving force and becoming the largest validator will inevitably lead to renewed external discussions about TON's centralization risks. In response, Pavel Durov stated that Telegram's participation would attract more large-scale participants into the validator pool, thereby enhancing decentralization. This logic is not without merit, but the final judgment will depend on results, not statements.

The truly important aspects going forward are whether the validator structure can become more diverse, whether governance information is sufficiently transparent, whether the Foundation and community retain independent space, and whether ecosystem projects can continue developing without relying on Telegram's will.

Therefore, Telegram's return is not a simple positive but a trade-off. For TON to enter the mainstream application layer, it needs Telegram's strong execution capabilities; but the more prominent Telegram's role, the more TON needs to prove it is not merely an internal settlement chain serving Telegram.

High Staking Rewards Retain More Tokens for TON

Pavel Durov subsequently emphasized that TON ranks first in annual staking rewards among the top 50 cryptocurrencies by market cap, with a high rate of 18.8%. Compared to fee reduction and speed increase, high staking rewards are more likely to mobilize capital sentiment and provide TON with another layer of holding rationale in the market's eyes.

TON Annual Staking Rewards Rank First Among Top 50 Cryptocurrencies

This also makes TON's narrative somewhat more complete. It's not just relying on Telegram's user gateway to attract attention or improving experience through technical upgrades; it's also using staking rewards to keep capital within its ecosystem. The simultaneous presence of gateway, performance, validators, and rewards makes this change more substantial than a single positive factor.

Of course, high yield itself is not the end goal; it's more like buying TON a longer observation period. As long as subsequent developer tools and performance upgrades are delivered, and more capital is locked into the network, a positive feedback loop with real usage may form. For TON, the value of staking rewards isn't just about increasing holding returns but making the market willing to continue waiting for it to truly convert Telegram's gateway advantage.

TON's Return to Telegram Is Not the Finish Line, But a Tougher Challenge

The key for TON going forward is not to continue leveraging Telegram for traffic, but to truly become part of Telegram's application ecosystem. If Telegram's chat, payments, applications, creator economy, and automated interactions are gradually undertaken by TON, then TON's competitors will not just be other Layer1s, but all networks attempting to become the next-generation application infrastructure.

TON isn't just repeating the social traffic story; it's beginning to attempt to turn social traffic into on-chain order. The gateway is just the beginning; usage is the answer. Telegram can push TON to the forefront, but whether it stays there ultimately depends on whether TON can become the layer of infrastructure that operates behind user perception, within the functioning of applications.

If the past TON was still proving how close it is to Telegram, now it must prove how deeply integrated it can be within Telegram's daily use. True mainstream adoption isn't about making users aware they are using a chain, but about making the chain part of the application experience.

TON's opportunity lies here, and so does its pressure.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what is the new role that Telegram will assume in the TON network, as announced by Pavel Durov?

ATelegram will become the new core driver of the TON network, replacing the TON Foundation. It will also become the network's largest validator.

QWhat is identified as the key challenge TON needs to overcome, beyond just having access to Telegram's large user base?

ATON needs to transform its access and user reach into sustainable, long-term usage scenarios. It must convert Telegram's high-frequency social interactions into persistent on-chain activities.

QWhy are the reductions in transaction fees and improvements in speed particularly important for TON within the Telegram context?

ALow fees (approaching zero) and fast finality (0.6 seconds) are crucial to enable the small, frequent, and fragmented transactions typical of Telegram's daily use cases. They lower the barrier and reduce user friction, allowing the blockchain to operate seamlessly in the background of the app experience.

QWhat potential downside or concern is raised regarding Telegram becoming the core driver and largest validator of TON?

AThe move raises concerns about increased centralization risk and questions regarding the future independence of the TON Foundation and community projects. It represents a trade-off between stronger execution from Telegram and the need for TON to maintain network decentralization.

QHow does the article frame the high annual staking reward offered by TON, and what purpose does it serve?

AThe high staking reward (18.8% annually, ranked first among top 50 cryptocurrencies) is seen as a mechanism to attract and lock in capital within the TON ecosystem. It provides an additional incentive for holding TON and buys time for the network to realize its potential in converting Telegram's user base into active usage.

Letture associate

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit3 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit3 min fa

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News, July 21 – Pump.fun has launched its new "BOOST" mode as the standard launch mechanism for new tokens. The core of BOOST is to address the issue of "dead liquidity." Historically, when a token migrates from its bonding curve to a liquidity pool, roughly 20% of its liquidity becomes permanently locked and unusable, a problem the platform estimates costs over $100 million annually. The new mechanism redirects this 20% of funds, which would have been locked, to instead be used for a 5-minute Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) buyback of the token immediately after migration. The purchased tokens are then permanently burned. For example, this means reserving 17.6 SOL for SOL pairs or about $2516 for USDC pairs at migration. This creates a short-term buying pressure and reduces the token's supply. The goal is to improve the immediate post-launch performance of memecoins, potentially increasing trader retention and transaction volume on the platform. However, critics warn this could lower the bar for token launches, encouraging low-quality projects, and that the brief 5-minute buy pressure might lead to sharper price crashes once it ends if followed by large sell-offs.

Foresight News13 min fa

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News13 min fa

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

India's largest asset manager, SBI Funds Management, successfully listed on July 21 with a nearly $10 billion IPO, attracting approximately 42 times subscription. However, the first-day closing price rose only about 6.3%, falling short of the 16% premium anticipated in the grey market. This signals robust demand for core Indian financial assets but also disciplined pricing, indicating the IPO market is selectively open for strong brands with clear growth narratives. The low reported underwriting fees, which led some global banks to reduce participation, highlight a shift in pricing power towards powerful issuers like SBI. Its strong brand, banking parent, and stable cash flows reduced reliance on traditional investment banking sales channels, with local brokers playing a larger role. This fee dynamic may not be replicable for weaker issuers. SBI's performance is seen as a key test for India's IPO pipeline, including potential future large listings like Reliance Jio and NSE. Its success with tempered gains sets a new price anchor: high-quality assets can launch, but excessive valuation premiums are constrained. The true measure of a sustained market reopening will be whether subsequent major offerings can proceed smoothly at reasonable valuations.

marsbit31 min fa

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

marsbit31 min fa

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit41 min fa

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit41 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1 h fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot