# Trust Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "Trust", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

AI Trust Crisis Escalates, Blockchain Becomes an Indispensable 'Anti-Counterfeiting Layer'

AI systems are disrupting the internet, which was designed for human-scale interactions, by making it difficult to distinguish between human and machine-generated content, identities, and transactions. The core issue is the lack of a native method to differentiate humans from AI while preserving privacy and usability. Blockchain technology offers critical solutions through five key mechanisms: 1. AI can cheaply mimic human behavior at scale, but decentralized proof-of-personhood systems (e.g., World ID) increase the marginal cost of impersonation by enforcing uniqueness and scarcity. 2. Decentralized identity systems shift control from centralized platforms to users, reducing single points of failure and enhancing security and censorship resistance. 3. AI agents require portable, universal "passports" to operate across platforms without being locked into specific ecosystems, enabled by blockchain-based identity layers. 4. Existing payment systems are inadequate for AI agent-scale transactions; blockchain enables micro-payments, smart contracts, and programmable revenue sharing suitable for machine-to-machine commerce. 5. Privacy and security are intertwined: zero-knowledge proofs allow verification of attributes without exposing personal data, denying AI the raw materials needed for imitation. In summary, blockchain restores trust, raises impersonation costs, protects human-scale interactions, decentralizes identity, enforces privacy by default, and provides native economic infrastructure for AI agents—making it an essential layer for an AI-native internet.

比推02/05 15:30

AI Trust Crisis Escalates, Blockchain Becomes an Indispensable 'Anti-Counterfeiting Layer'

比推02/05 15:30

In 2026, Has the AI Agent Economy Truly Started to Operate?

The AI Agent economy reached a critical inflection point in January 2026, with three foundational layers—payments, trust, and social collaboration—becoming production-ready. The x402 protocol processed over 20 million transactions, ERC-8004 launched on Ethereum mainnet, and over 1.2 million autonomous agents registered on Moltbook. Infrastructure is now mature, but the product layer is still underdeveloped. While protocols are validated, key gaps remain in discovery mechanisms, capability verification, and middleware connecting trust and payment systems. x402 has stabilized with 89.2% of services priced between $0.01–$0.10, making microtransactions viable. ERC-8004 enables composable on-chain identity, reputation, and verification for agents. Despite a 68% drop in transaction count and 77% in volume, this reflects a shift from artificial volume to organic usage, with the buyer-to-seller ratio improving significantly. The biggest opportunities lie in demand-side solutions: a unified discovery layer (an "App Store for agents"), capability benchmarking beyond payment trust, and trust-gated payment middleware integrating ERC-8004 with x402. Primary paid use cases include trading signals, compute power, and granular data access. The ecosystem is consolidating around Base and Solana. While infrastructure development is concluding, builders must now focus on application-layer products, with a critical 2–3 month window to capitalize on the transition from protocol-ready to product-ready. Key risks include data noise, security vulnerabilities, and unresolved regulatory frameworks.

Odaily星球日报02/04 07:00

In 2026, Has the AI Agent Economy Truly Started to Operate?

Odaily星球日报02/04 07:00

Circle: Why Do 95% of Stablecoins Ultimately Fail?

The article "The Stablecoin Trap: Issuing a Stablecoin Without the Infrastructure to Run One" by Kash Razzaghi of Circle discusses the critical considerations for companies interested in stablecoins. While many executives are drawn to the idea of issuing their own stablecoin due to the market's growth (from $2050B to over $3000B in 2025), the author argues this is a strategic, not just technical, decision. Creating a stablecoin is relatively simple from an engineering perspective, but operating a trusted, regulated one requires a robust, 24/7 financial infrastructure. This includes real-time reserve management, daily bank reconciliations, independent audits, compliance reporting, and risk management systems. These operational burdens are complex, costly, and amplify reputational risk. The market has seen hundreds of stablecoin projects, but approximately 95% fail to achieve lasting, global scale. The key differentiator is not technology but trust, built through transparency, consistent redeemability, and proven performance across market cycles. Incidents like accidental trillion-dollar mints or temporary de-peggings highlight the severe consequences of operational flaws. Instead of building their own, most companies should focus on integrating existing, established stablecoins like USDC or EURC into their businesses. This allows them to benefit from instant settlement, global reach, and interoperability without the immense operational overhead. The industry is converging on the principle that trust, liquidity, and compliance are the true moats, favoring fewer, higher-quality stablecoins with shared liquidity and transparent reserves. The recommended path is to partner with proven providers like Circle rather than attempt to become an issuer.

marsbit02/03 13:17

Circle: Why Do 95% of Stablecoins Ultimately Fail?

marsbit02/03 13:17

活动图片