# Hyperliquid Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "Hyperliquid", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

Only 7 Native Tokens Remain in the Green Since the Start of the Year. And It's Not Bitcoin

Since the beginning of 2025, the majority of major cryptocurrencies have experienced significant double-digit losses, with only seven native Layer-1 (L1) tokens remaining in positive territory, according to data from Coinmarketcap. Notably, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) themselves are not among them, having declined by 2% and 5% respectively. The top performers are led by privacy-focused coins. Zcash (ZEC) surged by 600%, and Monero (XMR) rose by approximately 100%, despite facing regulatory pressures and delistings from major exchanges. Dash (DASH), another privacy-oriented token with optional anonymity features, also saw growth of nearly 30%. Bitcoin Cash (BCH), a major Bitcoin fork, increased by almost 40%. Its performance is partly attributed to the absence of venture capital backing, a fully unlocked token supply, and anticipation around a potential spot ETF approval in the US. Exchange-based tokens also performed well. BNB (from Binance) and Hyperliquid's HYPE each grew by around 30%. BNB's rise was fueled by major partnerships and news of potential eased US regulatory oversight, while HYPE benefited from a trader migration to decentralized exchanges (DEXs) amid tightening regulations on centralized platforms. Finally, Tron (TRX) posted a 13% gain. It distinguished itself as the most profitable blockchain network, generating over $207 million in revenue in November, heavily driven by its dominance in USDT stablecoin transactions, which account for 70% of the activity on its network.

RBK-crypto12/08 16:46

Only 7 Native Tokens Remain in the Green Since the Start of the Year. And It's Not Bitcoin

RBK-crypto12/08 16:46

HyENA Officially Launches: Ethena-Backed, USDe-Margined Perp DEX Lands on Hyperliquid

HyENA, a new perpetual DEX developed by the Based team, has officially launched on Hyperliquid. Supported by the Ethena Foundation, it introduces a novel trading model that allows users to post USDe as margin. A key innovation is that eligible USDe earns up to 12% APY while being used as collateral, enabling traders to generate yield on otherwise idle assets. The platform initially supports perpetual contracts for BTC, ETH, SOL, and HYPE. It also introduces a new DeFi primitive, HLPe, which consolidates various revenue streams like maker profits and funding rates into a single vault share for greater transparency and capital efficiency. HyENA is one of the first major products built on Hyperliquid's new HIP-3 standard, which allows builders to deploy their own perpetual markets with customizable parameters by staking HYPE. This framework enables faster listing of new trading pairs and innovative incentives while inheriting Hyperliquid's high performance. The Based team, a top builder on Hyperliquid and backed by Ethena, views HyENA as a critical step in establishing USDe as a premier margin asset in decentralized finance, bringing a high-frequency use case from centralized exchanges onchain.

深潮12/10 08:01

HyENA Officially Launches: Ethena-Backed, USDe-Margined Perp DEX Lands on Hyperliquid

深潮12/10 08:01

The Dark Side of Altcoins

The article "The Dark Side of Altcoins" argues that most cryptocurrency tokens inevitably fail due to a fundamental structural conflict between company equity and token holders. Most crypto projects are essentially traditional companies with equity-held founders, VC investors, and profit motives, which later issue a token. This creates irreconcilable incentives: equity seeks to capture value (revenue, profit, control) for the company and shareholders, while tokens need value (fees, buybacks, governance) to accrue to the protocol and holders. Equity almost always wins, leading to token value drainage. The piece highlights Hyperliquid as a rare success because it avoided VC equity financing entirely. Without a board or pressure to deliver value to shareholders, it could direct all economic value to its protocol and token. Legally, tokens cannot function like stocks without being deemed unregistered securities (if they offer dividends, ownership, etc.), which would trigger severe regulatory crackdowns. The optimal structure is one where the company holds no equity, captures no revenue, and all value flows to token holders via protocol mechanisms, with a DAO governing economic decisions. However, the only way to eliminate all conflict is to become a fully decentralized protocol like Bitcoin or Ethereum, with no company, no equity, and neutral, autonomously running infrastructure. The core issue is structural, not market conditions. Tokens are mathematically destined to fail if the project had VC rounds, private token sales, investor unlock schedules, or allows the company to capture revenue. Success requires value directed to the protocol, no VC equity, aligned founder/tokenholder incentives, and an economically irrelevant company. The solution is for investors to stop funding poorly designed projects. The future of the industry depends on capital flowing to projects with sound tokenomics, like those pioneered by Hyperliquid, MetaDAO, and Street.

深潮12/11 10:13

The Game Between Tokens and Equity: Revealing the Fundamental Conflict Behind Token Economics

The article "The Dark Side of Altcoins" by Crypto Dan explores the fundamental conflict between company equity and token holders in crypto projects. It argues that most projects are essentially companies with tokens, creating a structural conflict where equity (backed by VCs and boards) inevitably captures value at the expense of token holders. This leads to tokens trending toward zero despite project success. Hyperliquid is highlighted as an exception because it avoided VC equity financing, directing all economic value to the protocol instead of a corporate entity. The piece explains that tokens cannot legally function like stocks without being classified as securities, triggering regulatory issues. The ideal structure involves no company revenue capture, value accrual to token holders via mechanisms like buybacks, and DAO-controlled economic decisions. However, true alignment requires no corporate structure at all, akin to Bitcoin or Ethereum. The core issue is structural: tokens fail due to design flaws like VC funding, private sales, unlock schedules, or company revenue retention. Solutions require investors to stop funding flawed models and support projects like Hyperliquid that prioritize tokenholder alignment through thoughtful design.

比推2 giorni fa 19:00

The Game Between Tokens and Equity: Revealing the Fundamental Conflict Behind Token Economics

比推2 giorni fa 19:00

Bankless | Hyperliquid's Epic Battle in 2025, Can It Hold Its Ground in 2026?

Hyperliquid dominated the perpetual futures exchange landscape in 2025, rising from a major airdrop in late 2024 to become the fourth-largest crypto ecosystem by revenue, earning over $650 million and at one point capturing 70% of all perp trading volume. Its success was driven by a crypto-native strategy, including quickly listing trending tokens like TRUMP, the launch of its HyperEVM smart contract layer, and key integrations with major wallets like Phantom and MetaMask via its builder codes program. However, facing rising competition from platforms like Aster and Lighter, along with an automatic deleveraging (ADL) event and team token unlocks in Q4, Hyperliquid’s market share fell to around 17% by year-end. The question for 2026 is whether it can maintain its lead through organic growth and decentralization as the perp market grows more competitive.

比推2 giorni fa 23:52

Bankless | Hyperliquid's Epic Battle in 2025, Can It Hold Its Ground in 2026?