Strive Buys Strategy Stock, Bitcoin Treasury Firms Begin Interlocking Dolls

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-12

Introduzione

On March 11, Strive, a Bitcoin treasury company, announced it had purchased $50 million worth of preferred shares (STRC) issued by MicroStrategy (now Strategy)—another major corporate Bitcoin holder. This represents over one-third of Strive’s treasury. Both companies use raised capital to buy Bitcoin, and both issue high-yield preferred shares (SATA from Strive, STRC from Strategy) to fund these purchases. Strive’s Chief Risk Officer justified the move by claiming STRC offers better risk-adjusted returns than U.S. Treasuries. However, this creates a circular dependency: Strategy uses proceeds from STRC to buy Bitcoin, and Strive relies on Strategy’s Bitcoin performance to earn yield on its STRC investment—which it may use to buy more Bitcoin or pay dividends on its own SATA shares. Strive, founded in 2022, has rapidly accumulated 13,311 BTC (worth ~$930 million), making it a top-ten corporate Bitcoin holder. Its stock (ASST) has fallen 97% from its peak, trading far below its Bitcoin-backed NAV. Despite this, Strive continues to aggressively accumulate Bitcoin and raise dividends on SATA shares. This reflects a broader trend: over 200 companies now emulate MicroStrategy’s “Bitcoin treasury” strategy. As these firms begin investing in each other’s debt-like instruments, the ecosystem becomes increasingly interconnected—and vulnerable—to Bitcoin's price volatility.

Author: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

On March 11, a company called Strive announced several things.

It increased its Bitcoin holdings by 179 coins, bringing its total to 13,311 BTC, worth approximately $930 million. It raised the dividend yield on its own preferred stock, SATA, to 12.75%. And, it spent $50 million to buy Strategy's preferred stock, STRC.

$50 million—that's over one-third of Strive's corporate treasury.

What does Strive do? It hoards Bitcoin. What does Strategy do? It also hoards Bitcoin.

So this became: A company that hoards Bitcoin used one-third of its money to buy stock issued by another company that hoards Bitcoin.

Strive's Chief Risk Officer, Jeff Walton, posted a tweet saying STRC is a "high-quality credit product with good liquidity and a superior risk-reward ratio compared to traditional fixed income." Translation: We think this is better than government bonds.

He even did the math, saying that if this $50 million were used to buy U.S. Treasury bonds, the annual interest would be a few million. Buying STRC could yield an extra $3.9 million annually.

It sounds like a good deal.

But think about it: Where does the money from Strategy's STRC issuance come from?

Strategy raises funds by issuing STRC and uses that money to buy Bitcoin. STRC can pay you interest, provided Strategy's Bitcoin doesn't drop too much.

So the underlying logic of Strive's investment is: My hoarded Bitcoin will rise, his hoarded Bitcoin will also rise, and only if his Bitcoin rises can he pay me interest, which I then use to buy more Bitcoin.

This isn't called diversification; it's called nesting dolls.

In Case You Didn't Know Strive

Many people know about Strategy (the former MicroStrategy), but not many know about Strive.

But now this company holds 13,311 Bitcoin, worth about $930 million, just surpassing Tesla's holdings and ranking around tenth among global publicly listed companies.

Strive's founder is Vivek Ramaswamy, a second-generation Indian immigrant, Harvard undergraduate, Yale Law School graduate. In 2022, he and a high school classmate founded Strive in Ohio, focusing on asset management and issuing ETF funds.

Early investors included PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel and hedge fund manager Bill Ackman.

Within a year and a half of launch, its assets under management exceeded $1 billion. But Vivek didn't stay long; he resigned in early 2023 to run for U.S. President. He lost the Republican primary to Trump, and this year he switched to running for Governor of Ohio. Interestingly, both Trump and Musk showed support for him...

After Vivek left, the new CEO became Matt Cole, who previously managed $70 billion at the California Public Employees' Retirement System, coming from a traditional finance background. But last year he made a rather unconventional decision.

In September 2025, Cole announced Strive would transform from a fund company into a "Bitcoin treasury company." In one go, it spent $675 million to buy over 5,800 Bitcoin at an average price of $116,000. In the same month, it announced the acquisition of another listed company, Semler Scientific, merging to hold over 10,000 Bitcoin.

Half a year later, its holdings have now grown to 13,311 coins.

A fund company founded in 2022 transformed into one of the world's top ten corporate Bitcoin holders in just three years. The speed is so rapid it makes one ask a question:

What money was used to buy these Bitcoins?

Nesting Doll Stock Issuance

Where did Strive get the money to buy Bitcoin? It raised it by issuing stock.

Last November, Strive issued a type of preferred stock called SATA. Investors buy it, and Strive pays quarterly interest, currently at an annualized rate of 12.75%. The money raised is used by Strive to buy Bitcoin.

Strive didn't invent this playbook. The inventor is Michael Saylor.

Saylor's company, Strategy, holds over 730,000 Bitcoin, making it the world's largest corporate Bitcoin holder. Last year, he launched a similar product called STRC. Investors buy it, Strategy pays interest, currently at an annualized 11.5%. The money raised is also used by Strategy to buy Bitcoin.

Up to this point, the two companies were playing their own games, following the same logic, unrelated.

But the transaction on March 11 connected these two lines. Strive used $50 million to buy STRC.

The chain now looks like this:

Strategy issues STRC to raise money to buy Bitcoin. Strive buys their STRC to earn interest. Strive then issues its own SATA to raise money to continue buying Bitcoin and STRC.

Layers upon layers, each layer paying investors double-digit interest, each layer's confidence to pay that interest stemming from the same thing: Bitcoin must not fall sharply.

If Bitcoin rises, everyone makes money. If Bitcoin falls, everyone's interest payments are at risk, but no single layer can stop losses independently because your asset is someone else's liability.

Three layers of products, three layers of interest, three layers of investors. Underneath it all, one asset: BTC, which must not fall.

Meanwhile, Strive's own stock, ASST, had a 52-week high of $268 and is now trading at less than $9, down 97%. On the day it announced the STRC purchase (March 11), the stock price only rose 5.52%.

At the end of October last year, ASST once fell below $0.80, nearly 50% below its net asset value in Bitcoin.

So the picture is this: A company holding $930 million worth of Bitcoin has a market capitalization of just over $500 million. Its stock price is down 97% from its high. But management is doubling down—buying more Bitcoin, buying STRC, raising the SATA dividend.

However, Strategy's own stock, MSTR, has been falling for eight consecutive months this year. Bitcoin has also pulled back significantly from last year's highs.

But everyone in this chain is increasing their bets.

Strategy bought 66,000 new Bitcoins in the first two months of this year, more than in any full year before. Strive is increasing its Bitcoin holdings while also spending $50 million on STRC. SATA's dividend yield has been raised from 10% at issuance to 12.75%. STRC's dividend yield has also been raised from 10% to 11.5%.

Rising interest rates mean it's getting harder to retain investors—they have to pay more.

Data shows that there are now over 200 publicly listed companies globally that have announced adopting the "Bitcoin treasury strategy." Before 2025, this number was less than 30.

Saylor invented a new game, and 200 companies copied the homework. Now, they're starting to buy each other's issued products.

When everyone's bet is on the same table, the difference between "structured financing" and "concentrated gambling" might just be a few extra arrows on a PowerPoint slide.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat did Strive announce on March 11th regarding its Bitcoin holdings and investment activities?

AOn March 11th, Strive announced it had purchased an additional 179 bitcoins, bringing its total holdings to 13,311 BTC (worth approximately $930 million). It also raised the dividend yield on its preferred stock (SATA) to 12.75% and invested $50 million in Strategy's preferred stock (STRC).

QWhat is the core business model of both Strive and Strategy, and why is Strive's investment in STRC considered a 'nested doll' strategy?

ABoth Strive and Strategy are Bitcoin treasury companies, meaning their core business is accumulating and holding Bitcoin. Strive's investment in Strategy's STRC stock is considered a 'nested doll' or circular strategy because Strive is using capital (raised from its own SATA stock) to buy a financial product (STRC) whose returns are dependent on Strategy's Bitcoin holdings performing well. This creates a layered financial structure where the success of each company's debt payments is ultimately tied to the same underlying asset (Bitcoin) not decreasing in value.

QWho is the founder of Strive, and what notable shift did the company undergo in 2025?

AStrive was founded by Vivek Ramaswamy. In September 2025, under new CEO Matt Cole, the company underwent a significant shift, transforming from an asset management firm into a 'Bitcoin treasury company.' It purchased over 5,800 bitcoins for $675 million and later merged with Semler Scientific, pushing its total holdings above 10,000 bitcoins.

QHow does the financial structure involving SATA and STRC create risk for investors?

AThe structure creates significant concentration risk. Both SATA (from Strive) and STRC (from Strategy) pay high dividend yields (12.75% and 11.5% respectively), which are funded by the companies' Bitcoin holdings. If the price of Bitcoin falls substantially, it could jeopardize both companies' ability to service their debt and pay these dividends. Since Strive is investing in Strategy's debt, the risk is interconnected; a failure at one company could impact the other, and all investors are ultimately exposed to the volatility of a single asset.

QWhat does the 97% decline in Strive's stock price (ASST) indicate about market sentiment towards its strategy?

AThe massive decline in Strive's stock price (ASST), from a 52-week high of $268 to under $9, indicates extremely negative market sentiment. It suggests that investors are skeptical of the company's Bitcoin-focused business model and its high-yield financing strategy (SATA), valuing the company significantly below the net asset value of its Bitcoin holdings.

Letture associate

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbit14 min fa

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbit14 min fa

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbit1 h fa

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbit1 h fa

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

"On-Chain Numbers on the Eve of the World Cup: $1.6 Billion Traded Before Kick-off" Analysis of on-chain markets before the 2026 FIFA World Cup reveals significant crypto integration into football. The most striking figure is the approximately **$1.6 billion** in total trading volume on the single "World Cup Winner" contract on the Polymarket prediction market platform, accumulated before a single match was played. This represents explosive growth for a sector whose annual volume surged from ~$16B in 2024 to ~$64B in 2025. The ecosystem is maturing beyond speculation. Key developments include: 1) **Infrastructure upgrades** like Polymarket's migration to native, regulated USDC stablecoin for settlements; 2) **Reliable data oracles**, such as Chainlink, being used to resolve real-world match outcomes on-chain; and 3) **Official recognition**, with FIFA appointing its first-ever "Prediction Markets" partner. Over 100 contracts now cover everything from the outright winner to individual match results and even non-sporting risks like venue relocation. This evolution marks a fundamental shift. While crypto firms are absent from FIFA's top-tier sponsor list, the technology has deeply penetrated the tournament's financial and predictive infrastructure through regulated stablecoin settlements, decentralized oracles, and new official partnership categories. The regulatory landscape remains complex and varies by jurisdiction, but on-chain markets for the World Cup are already a multi-billion-dollar reality.

marsbit2 h fa

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片