"Startled from a deathbed illness," SBF desperately flatters Trump for pardon but gets rejected

marsbitPubblicato 2026-02-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-25

Introduzione

Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the convicted cryptocurrency fraudster and former major donor to the Democratic Party, has recently adopted a pro-Trump and MAGA-aligned rhetoric in a series of social media posts. Despite being sentenced to 25 years in federal prison, SBF has been actively praising Donald Trump and criticizing what he calls the "Deep State" and partisan bias in the judiciary, explicitly naming the judge who sentenced him. His apparent goal is to seek a presidential pardon from Trump, who has previously pardoned high-profile financial criminals, including Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ). However, the Trump administration has reiterated that he has no intention of pardoning SBF, along with several other notable prisoners. SBF, once a prominent supporter of progressive causes, began shifting toward conservative alignment after the collapse of FTX, even planning to appear on Tucker Carlson’s show as a Republican. Despite his efforts, his history as a top Biden donor and his notorious reputation in crypto make a pardon highly unlikely. SBF continues to appeal and maintains an active, conservatively-focused social media presence through approved prison communication channels.

Author: Fortune

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

Convicted cryptocurrency fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) was once a major donor to the Democratic Party, but his recent public statements have taken on a distinct "MAGA" (Make America Great Again) tone. In a recent manifesto posted on platform X, he wrote: "Judge Lewis Kaplan, appointed by Clinton, showed no restraint in his political bias when sentencing me. I admire President Donald Trump because he dares to stand up to this 'partisan, out-of-control radical'!"

This is just one of dozens of tweets SBF has posted in recent weeks, filled with attacks on the "Deep State" and other MAGA villains. Despite being one of the most notorious financial criminals of the century, currently serving a 25-year sentence in federal prison, he remains active.

Although SBF has not explicitly stated it, the purpose of his social media frenzy is obvious: to persuade President Donald Trump to rescue him from prison. Given that Trump has pardoned several high-profile individuals convicted of financial crimes, including SBF's former rival, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ), this strategy seems logical.

However, for SBF, his plea for Trump's mercy appears futile. In response to recent social media advocacy, a White House spokesperson reiterated to Fortune magazine that Trump has no intention of pardoning SBF.

In an email, the spokesperson referenced Trump's remarks in January of this year, when the president explicitly stated that he did not plan to pardon SBF or several other high-profile prisoners, including former New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez and ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The spokesperson wrote: "The president is the final arbiter of all pardon matters."

SBF's lawyers did not respond to the matter.

Failed Attempt

SBF has long been a supporter of progressive causes, and his parents, both law professors at Stanford University, wield considerable influence among top Democrats. However, when SBF's fraudulent crypto empire collapsed in November 2022, the founder began planning a shift to the right. During the trial, a private document revealed that SBF planned to appear on conservative TV host Tucker Carlson's show and "come out as a Republican."

On the surface, this strategy seemed reasonable, especially in the current political climate. Trump is set to take office in January 2025 and has promised to roll back the Biden administration's crackdown on cryptocurrencies. Under Trump's leadership, regulators have withdrawn key lawsuits against blockchain companies, and the Department of Justice has shifted its approach to cryptocurrency enforcement.

However, Washington insiders say SBF's status as a top donor to Biden, combined with his continued notoriety in the crypto industry, made his pardon plea a long shot from the start. Even his unauthorized appearance on Tucker Carlson's show last year (which reportedly landed him in solitary confinement) failed to turn the tide.

Despite the slim chances, SBF has not given up. He is still appealing his conviction in federal appellate court. His X account is filled with posts promoting his newly adopted conservative identity, which critics have dubbed a "puppet account." (In his bio, SBF clarifies that he communicates content to agents via Bureau of Prisons-approved phones and emails for posting.)

A recent post read: "Democrats love to censor 'misinformation' on social media," followed by praise for Trump's campaign platform. "Truth Social and GETTR have always put free speech first."

Related reading: SBF's first prison interview: I was targeted by the DOJ for donating to the Republican Party, begging President Trump's pardon

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried) is trying to align himself with MAGA and Donald Trump?

ASBF is attempting to seek a pardon from Donald Trump by publicly supporting him and criticizing his opponents, hoping for a commutation of his 25-year prison sentence for cryptocurrency fraud.

QHow did the White House respond to SBF's recent efforts to gain support from Trump?

AA White House spokesperson reiterated to Fortune magazine that Trump has no intention of pardoning SBF, referencing Trump's earlier statements in January where he explicitly stated he would not pardon SBF and other high-profile prisoners.

QWhat was SBF's political affiliation before his legal troubles, and how did it change?

ASBF was previously a major donor to the Democratic Party and supported progressive causes. However, after the collapse of his crypto empire in November 2022, he began shifting to the right, planning to appear as a Republican on conservative media.

QWhat strategy did SBF use to promote his new conservative identity while in prison?

ASBF used his X (formerly Twitter) account, managed by an approved intermediary through prison-approved phone and email, to post numerous messages criticizing the 'Deep State' and praising Trump, in an effort to build conservative support.

QWhy is SBF's attempt to gain a pardon from Trump considered unlikely to succeed?

ASBF's past as a top donor to Biden, his notorious reputation in the crypto industry, and the explicit rejection from Trump's camp make his pardon plea highly unlikely, despite his efforts to align with conservative causes.

Letture associate

Those Who Use AI to 'Quickly Finish the Job' Are Ruining the Workplace

Some people are using AI tools to quickly produce superficially complete work, like reports, proposals, or performance reviews, just to "check a box." This results in "Workslop" – workplace AI output that looks polished but lacks factual verification, professional judgment, and real value. The core problem is the shifting of work costs: while the generator saves time, the receiver must spend hours verifying information, correcting errors, and deciphering vague conclusions. This undermines team efficiency and trust. Examples include a manager using AI for vague, unactionable employee feedback, an analyst generating weekly reports with misleading AI-interpreted data, and a team producing extensive project documents with no one able to justify the underlying assumptions. The issue isn't AI itself, but how it's used. It amplifies existing work habits. Responsible users treat AI as an assistant for drafting and organizing, then add firsthand verification and judgment. Those merely looking to "hand in" work delegate responsibility to the AI and their colleagues. Ultimately, the value of work should be judged not by its speed or polish, but by whether it provides new facts, clear judgments, and an accountable owner. AI cannot understand context, make critical decisions, or bear the consequences – those remain irreplaceably human responsibilities.

marsbit2 min fa

Those Who Use AI to 'Quickly Finish the Job' Are Ruining the Workplace

marsbit2 min fa

From 'Western Learning Ants' to Korean Pension Funds: Why Does Korean Capital Continue to Flow to the US?

Summary: "From 'Western Ants' to National Pension: Why Korean Capital Continues to Flow to the U.S.?" South Korea’s capital is increasingly moving toward U.S. markets, driven by two key investor groups. Individual retail investors, known as "Western Ants," actively trade U.S. stocks overnight, seeking exposure to major tech firms and higher returns often unavailable in Korea’s concentrated domestic market. Simultaneously, the National Pension Service (NPS), managing over $1.16 trillion in assets, is expanding its global investment footprint. Facing demographic pressures and the sheer size of its fund, NPS has steadily increased overseas allocations, with over half its financial assets now invested abroad. A recent memorandum of understanding with six top U.S. venture capital firms (including Sequoia and a16z) marks a strategic extension into Silicon Valley’s private investment ecosystem, aiming to access growth-stage tech opportunities while leveraging external managers’ expertise. While both flows reflect limitations of Korea’s home market, their risk profiles differ sharply: retail investors often pursue speculative, concentrated bets, whereas NPS must ensure long-term, diversified returns for national retirement security. This outward shift also creates macroeconomic tensions, as demand for dollars from both groups pressures the Korean won, prompting coordinated measures between NPS and the central bank to mitigate currency volatility. Ultimately, Korea’s growing financial integration with global markets—especially the U.S.—signals a broader structural shift where citizens’ wealth and pension sustainability are increasingly tied to worldwide economic dynamics.

marsbit7 min fa

From 'Western Learning Ants' to Korean Pension Funds: Why Does Korean Capital Continue to Flow to the US?

marsbit7 min fa

SharpLink's Helm: Buy, Don't Sell, Let ETH Generate Income in the Crypto Winter

SharpLink co-CEO Joseph Chalom, in an interview at the Injective Summit 2026, argues that market pessimism about Ethereum is detached from its strong fundamentals. He highlights that Ethereum dominates stablecoin trading volume (over 50%), tokenized real-world assets (nearly 60%), and DeFi. To counter negative sentiment stemming from the Ethereum Foundation's restructuring, SharpLink, alongside ConsenSys and Bitwise, is funding three newly independent teams from the Foundation: ETH Labs (scaling), Ethereum Institutional (marketing/business development), and EthSystems (privacy/compliance). These initiatives aim to accelerate institutional adoption. Chalom outlines SharpLink's strategy: raising billions to acquire and hold ETH productively through staking and DeFi partnerships without using leverage or debt, contrasting this with Bitcoin-focused treasury models that may require selling assets. He sees tokenization of assets and 24/7 trading as key future drivers, with regulatory clarity (e.g., the Clarity Act) acting as a catalyst. He believes institutions will eventually prefer tokenized, programmable assets for their constant tradability. SharpLink's roadmap focuses on being an "ecosystem steward," investing in Ethereum's growth to align with its shareholders' long-term interests.

marsbit20 min fa

SharpLink's Helm: Buy, Don't Sell, Let ETH Generate Income in the Crypto Winter

marsbit20 min fa

This Strategy Earned Hefei One Trillion Yuan

This article analyzes the "Hefei Model" that enabled a municipal state-owned investment to generate paper profits exceeding one trillion yuan through the 2026 IPO of ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). It argues against framing this success as a "lucky gamble," instead presenting it as the result of a deliberate institutional system designed to enable long-term industrial investment. The system comprises three core components. First, a **quantified risk-tolerance mechanism**, including a 40% loss allowance for venture funds and a clear "duty-fulfilled exemption" list, decouples project failure from personal career risk for decision-makers, allowing them to focus on industrial potential rather than personal liability. Second, **strategic investment in critical supply chain gaps**: Hefei doesn't just invest in "good" projects, but targets "missing" links essential for its key industries (appliances, displays, cars). The investment in CXMT aimed to fill the critical DRAM memory chip gap, subsequently attracting over 450 upstream and downstream firms and creating a full semiconductor cluster. Third, **institutional authorization for counter-cyclical investment**: Protected by the risk-tolerance framework, Hefei supported CXMT with increased investment during the 2023 global memory industry downturn, enabling it to scale production and capitalize on the 2025 AI-driven demand surge. The article concludes that the true lesson is not the specific investment but building the institutional infrastructure—quantified risk tolerance, deep industry chain analysis, and counter-cyclical mandates—that makes such long-term, strategic bets possible. It notes the final challenge is perfecting the exit mechanism to complete the investment cycle and transform paper gains into sustainable fiscal returns and reinvestment capacity.

marsbit21 min fa

This Strategy Earned Hefei One Trillion Yuan

marsbit21 min fa

Silicon Valley VC's On-the-Ground Observations of Chinese Entrepreneurship: A Harsher Capital Environment Breeding Fiercer Companies

A Silicon Valley VC's on-the-ground observations of China's startup ecosystem reveal a harsher capital environment forging more aggressive and execution-driven companies. Unlike Silicon Valley's patient capital focused on long-term growth, China's venture landscape is characterized by intense pressure for exits. Startups often face "equity in name, debt in reality" terms with strict timelines and personal founder liability, pushing IPO as the nearly mandatory exit path due to a virtually non-existent M&A market. This high-stakes system, while potentially fostering short-termism, cultivates extreme cost discipline, rapid execution, and formidable commercialization skills—traits evident as these companies expand overseas. The funding ecosystem comprises three main pools: local RMB funds (often government-backed with economic development mandates), domestic USD funds (more founder-friendly, like Sequoia China), and dwindling direct foreign capital. Financial Advisors (FAs) play a crucial intermediary role, packaging deals and navigating China's opaque, relationship-based business networks where platforms like LinkedIn haven't taken root. Underpinning it all is significant state influence through industrial policy, directing capital and incentives toward strategic sectors like semiconductors and AI. The result is a distinct, parallel innovation model—less forgiving than Silicon Valley's, but capable of concentrating resources, accelerating iteration, and producing fiercely competitive companies in targeted industries.

marsbit26 min fa

Silicon Valley VC's On-the-Ground Observations of Chinese Entrepreneurship: A Harsher Capital Environment Breeding Fiercer Companies

marsbit26 min fa

Trading

Spot