Stablecoin usage up 600% – Is USDC taking the lead from USDT?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-23

Introduzione

Stablecoin usage on the Ethereum network has grown significantly, with active addresses surging 600% from March 2025 to March 2026, indicating deeper integration beyond speculative trading into payments and cross-border transactions. A notable shift in market preference shows USD Coin (USDC) leading with a $4.5 billion supply increase, while Tether (USDT) experienced a $2 billion contraction, reflecting a move toward perceived regulatory clarity. Despite a slight decline in exchange reserves and net outflows of $485 million, the capital is being parked rather than fully exiting, reducing immediate sell pressure and supporting short-term market stability. Overall, stablecoin liquidity is consolidating rather than expanding, with total supply at $316.45 billion.

ERC20 stablecoin activity is undergoing a structural expansion, as active addresses surged from roughly 85,000 in March 2025 to nearly 600,000 in March 2026.

This 600% growth reflects more than temporary spikes, as activity has trended upward steadily since 2024. As participation broadens, the pattern shifts from isolated bursts to sustained usage, which suggests deeper integration across the network.

Source: CryptoQuant

At the same time, this rise signals a change in function.

Stablecoins are moving beyond DeFi trading pairs toward transactional infrastructure. As a result, flows increasingly reflect payments, settlements, and cross-border transfers rather than speculative positioning.

However, rising activity also implies higher dependency on stablecoin liquidity.

As usage concentrates around these assets, they become central to capital movement across markets. This dynamic suggests crypto liquidity is becoming more efficient, while also more sensitive to stablecoin-driven demand cycles.

Stablecoin flows shift as USDC gains dominance over USDT

Stablecoin flows show a clear rotation in market preference, as USD Coin [USDC] leads supply expansion year-to-date.

USDC added $4.5 billion, marking the largest increase across all tracked assets. This rise reflects strong inflows during a volatile period.

Tether [USDT] moved in the opposite direction, with its supply contracting by roughly $2 billion, signaling capital outflows. As this divergence forms, it highlights a shift toward perceived stability and regulatory clarity.

Source: Artemis

This gap suggests growing usage beyond simple liquidity storage. As volumes expand, USDC strengthens its role in DeFi and payments infrastructure.

However, this concentration also implies that liquidity is becoming more centralized. As capital rotates, market dependence on fewer stablecoins increases, shaping how liquidity flows across the broader ecosystem.

Stablecoin flows show consolidation, not capitulation

Stablecoin flows reflect a cautious but balanced shift, as liquidity moves away from exchanges without fully exiting the market. Exchange Reserves stand at $65.37 billion, down 0.72% in 24 hours.

Net Outflows reached over $485 million, signaling movement toward self-custody. This suggests capital is being parked rather than actively deployed. However, this shift also reduces immediate sell pressure on exchanges, which can support price stability.

Total stablecoin supply sits at $316.45 billion, rising just 0.17% weekly. USDT grew 0.08% to $184.1 billion, while USDC fell 0.22% to $79.1 billion, showing mixed demand.

This balance implies liquidity is rotating rather than expanding, keeping markets stable in the short term while leaving momentum dependent on renewed capital deployment.


Final Summary

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the percentage growth in active addresses for ERC20 stablecoins from March 2025 to March 2026?

A600%

QWhich stablecoin led the supply expansion year-to-date and by how much?

AUSD Coin (USDC) led the supply expansion, adding $4.5 billion.

QWhat was the change in Tether's (USDT) supply during the same timeframe?

ATether's (USDT) supply contracted by roughly $2 billion.

QWhat is the new primary function that stablecoins are moving towards, according to the article?

AStablecoins are moving beyond DeFi trading pairs toward transactional infrastructure, such as payments, settlements, and cross-border transfers.

QWhat was the total stablecoin supply and the 24-hour change in Exchange Reserves mentioned in the article?

AThe total stablecoin supply was $316.45 billion, and Exchange Reserves were $65.37 billion, down 0.72% in 24 hours.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit22 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit22 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit42 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit42 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit51 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit51 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片