‘Stablecoin ordinance has taken effect’ – Hong Kong pushes for crypto regulation

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-01Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-01

Introduzione

Hong Kong has activated a licensing regime for fiat-backed stablecoin issuers, with the Stablecoin Ordinance taking effect in August. Financial Services Secretary Christopher Hui stated that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is currently processing license applications. The government views crypto as a "new growth area" to strengthen the city’s status as an international financial hub. Regulatory details for trading platforms, custody services, and advisory providers are being developed, alongside enhanced anti-money laundering measures. The first approved issuers are expected in Q1 2026. Financial Secretary Paul Chan emphasized the need for strong safeguards to protect investors and ensure market stability, aligning with global regulatory trends like those in the U.S. and U.K.

Hong Kong has revealed that it has activated licensing for issuers of fiat-based stablecoins amid a broader push for crypto regulatory clarity.

During a policy briefing with the Legislative Council’s Finance Committee, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Christopher Hui, said,

“The Stablecoin Ordinance was officially implemented last August, introducing a licensing system for fiat-denominated stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is currently processing relevant license applications.”

Hui framed crypto as a ‘new growth area’ that could further reinforce the city as an international finance center.

The official noted that regulators are working on the details of the relevant regulatory regime for virtual asset trading and custody service providers, as well as other aspects of digital asset markets.

He added,

“The Financial Services and the Treasury, and the SFC are also further consulting the public on establishing a regulatory regime for service providers offering advice on virtual assets and virtual asset management service providers...”

Additionally, to combat tax evasion in the sector and strengthen anti-money laundering efforts, the official said they were collecting feedback on the same.

Issuer approvals expected in Q1

The first batch list of approved licensed stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong is expected in Q1 2026, according to the city’s Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po.

During the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, the finance chief billed digital assets as,

“Financial innovation that we should embrace proactively. We also believe digital assets should serve the real economy.”

Mo-po pressed that the city must build strong guardrails to mitigate crypto market-related risks that could undermine broader financial stability, the overall market integrity, and protect investors.

Indeed, Hong Kong’s stablecoin bill requires strict standards for reserves, redemption, and risk measures.

Similarly, it tightened rules on custodians and dealers, laying the groundwork for a broader crypto regulatory framework.

The trend mirrors regulatory approaches in the U.K. and the U.S to offer clear rules for the growing sector. Notably, the U.S. passed its stablecoin bill last year, marking a significant step for digital assets.

However, the broader market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, still faces uncertainty. Contentious issues, such as yield and tokenized stocks, continue to stall its progress.

In the U.K., Parliament recently launched a stablecoin inquiry to review the proposed regulatory regime that is set to be finalized by the end of 2026.


Final Thoughts

  • Hong Kong is gearing up to list its first batch of approved and licensed stablecoin issuers in Q1.
  • Top officials believe crypto is a ‘new growth’ area to position Hong Kong as an international finance center.

Domande pertinenti

QWhen did the Stablecoin Ordinance officially take effect in Hong Kong?

AThe Stablecoin Ordinance officially took effect in August of last year.

QWhat is the expected timeline for the first batch of approved licensed stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong?

AThe first batch of approved licensed stablecoin issuers is expected in the first quarter (Q1) of 2026.

QAccording to the Financial Secretary, what role should digital assets serve?

AFinancial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po stated that digital assets should serve the real economy.

QWhich two regulatory bodies are consulting the public on establishing a regime for virtual asset advisory and management services?

AThe Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) are conducting the public consultation.

QWhat are some of the key areas the Hong Kong stablecoin bill imposes strict standards on?

AThe bill imposes strict standards on reserves, redemption processes, and risk management measures for stablecoin issuers.

Letture associate

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit29 min fa

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit29 min fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片