South Korea Delays Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2025-12-31Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-31

Introduzione

South Korea has postponed the implementation of its Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 due to regulatory disagreements, primarily between the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea, over stablecoin oversight. The legislation, intended to establish a foundational crypto regulatory framework, aims to enhance investor protection through stricter rules, including no-fault liability for operators and reserve requirements for stablecoin issuers. However, disputes over enforcement authority and reserve management have stalled progress, creating uncertainty for crypto firms. The ruling party has proposed consolidating various proposals into a revised bill, with a focus on developing a Korean won-backed stablecoin to counter dollar-dominated stablecoins.

South Korea has delayed its Digital Asset Basic Law till 2026, as regulators are still divided over stablecoin oversight authority, as revealed by legislative sources. The policymakers have halted the crypto legislation as the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea carry on clashing over control of stablecoin reserves and enforcement responsibilities, making regulatory uncertainty in one of Asia’s biggest crypto markets.

The Digital Asset Basic Law is made in a way to be the foundation of South Korea’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework. The legislation is focused on strengthening investor protection by putting robust and strict legal regulations on digital asset operators as per the draft bill.

The prominent offer includes the introduction of no-fault liability, making operators responsible for user losses even without determined negligence. The draft also needs stablecoin issuers to keep reserves surpassing 100% of circulating supply kept at banks or dignified institutions and different from the issuer’s balance sheet to restrict contagion risks.

Stablecoin oversight came as the major point of contention between regulators. At the same time, the authorities widely agree on the requirement of stronger supervision; they haven’t reached consensus on the basis of responsibilities for preserved rule enforcement and licensing authority.

The Non-Agreement

The non-agreement has entangled decisions over enforcement powers with the treatment of reserve assets, pushing authorities to delay the bill instead of advancing legislation having unresolved structural issues.

The delay further creates an uncertainty for crypto firms of South Korea, together with exchanges, payment providers and stablecoin issuers. If the regulatory framework is not complete, then it may affect the product launches, investment decisions, and operational planning, as said by industry observers.

The ruling party has planned to consolidate various policymaker proposals into a revised digital asset bill. The president of the Democratic Party, Lee Jae Myung, has recognised that a Korean won-supported stablecoin is a national priority, declaring it could be against the dominance of US dollar-linked stablecoins in global crypto markets, as per the statements from the presidential office.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Slides Below $90K as Spot BTC ETFs Record $780M in Outflows

Domande pertinenti

QWhy has South Korea delayed the implementation of its Digital Asset Basic Law until 2026?

ASouth Korea has delayed the Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 because regulators, specifically the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea, are divided over stablecoin oversight authority, including control of stablecoin reserves and enforcement responsibilities.

QWhat is the primary purpose of the Digital Asset Basic Law according to the draft bill?

AThe primary purpose of the Digital Asset Basic Law is to serve as the foundation of South Korea's cryptocurrency regulatory framework, with a focus on strengthening investor protection by imposing robust and strict legal regulations on digital asset operators.

QWhat are two key provisions included in the draft of the Digital Asset Basic Law?

ATwo key provisions are: 1) The introduction of no-fault liability, making operators responsible for user losses even without determined negligence. 2) A requirement for stablecoin issuers to keep reserves exceeding 100% of the circulating supply, held at banks or dignified institutions and kept separate from the issuer's balance sheet.

QHow does the regulatory delay impact crypto firms in South Korea?

AThe delay creates uncertainty for crypto firms, including exchanges, payment providers, and stablecoin issuers. It may affect their product launches, investment decisions, and operational planning until a complete regulatory framework is established.

QWhat national priority regarding stablecoins was recognized by the president of the Democratic Party, Lee Jae Myung?

ALee Jae Myung recognized the creation of a Korean won-supported stablecoin as a national priority, stating it could counter the dominance of US dollar-linked stablecoins in global crypto markets.

Letture associate

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

"Rented Conviction: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Is Real Money" The weekly inflows into Bitcoin ETFs are often interpreted as a gauge of institutional belief. However, a significant portion of this activity is driven by a hidden arbitrage trade, not directional conviction. The core mechanism is a cash-and-carry arbitrage: traders buy spot Bitcoin (often via ETFs) while simultaneously shorting CME futures to lock in the price difference, or "basis." This delta-neutral trade is essentially an interest rate play. In weekly data, about half the fluctuation in ETF flows can be explained by new short positions added by leveraged funds (hedge funds), with a correlation of 0.70. Bitcoin's price movement in a given week shows no statistical power in predicting these flows. While this arbitrage trade drives weekly *volatility*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows, the current net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The remainder is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week, which constitutes the vast majority of the accumulated "mountain" over two years. Thus, ETF flow data overstates the *volatility* of conviction, not its *level*. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for nearly two years. Leveraged fund short positions peaked at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and have since declined to ~$4.5 billion. When the basis compresses to unprofitable levels, ETF inflows and short positions retreat together. Recent outflows should not be mistaken for a loss of faith but rather the routine unwinding of this rate trade. For Ethereum ETFs, the pattern is weaker. Accounting for staking yield makes the basis often negative, so neither strong conviction buying nor robust arbitrage supports its flows. To interpret ETF flows correctly, monitor the CME basis versus T-bill rates and leveraged fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the next "demand" headline is real. The real, patient buy-and-hold demand is what constitutes the enduring bulk of ETF assets.

marsbit42 min fa

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

marsbit42 min fa

Another $75 Million Raised: Why Are Top VCs Betting on FOMO Again?

FOMO, a social crypto trading app, raises $75M in Series B led by Index Ventures, with participation from USV and follow-on from Benchmark. The round values the company at $550M. Launched in beta in mid-2025, FOMO simplifies on-chain trading by eliminating gas fees for users, supporting multiple blockchains (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Base, BNB Chain), and enabling direct crypto purchases via Apple Pay or debit cards. The app features social functions allowing users to follow traders and view their activity. Key metrics show rapid growth: over 625,000 users, $4B+ in cumulative trading volume, and more than 110M social interactions. Notably, over 68,000 users made their first crypto purchase through FOMO using Apple Pay. The platform recently expanded into perpetual contracts trading for stocks, pre-IPO assets, crypto, indices, and commodities. The founding team, with backgrounds from dYdX, Uniswap, and OpenSea, initially raised a $2M pre-seed round from 140+ angel investors across the crypto ecosystem before securing a $17M Series A from Benchmark in late 2025. FOMO's strategy focuses on removing technical friction to drive mainstream adoption, positioning itself as a potential gateway between crypto and traditional finance.

Foresight News1 h fa

Another $75 Million Raised: Why Are Top VCs Betting on FOMO Again?

Foresight News1 h fa

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

South China Morning Post The leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix has surged over tenfold year-to-date, fueled by intense market speculation on the memory chip sector. By June 22, the value of the 'South Korea 2x Long SK Hynix ETF' listed in Hong Kong had skyrocketed by more than 1,061% since the start of the year, while its asset size exploded over twenty times from the end of last year. The rally is driven by AI-driven demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM), with SK Hynix recently sampling its next-generation HBM4E product. However, industry professionals warn of significant risks. Leveraged ETFs magnify both gains and losses. During a recent market correction, while the underlying SK Hynix stock fell 19.1%, its double-leveraged ETF dropped nearly 38%. Korean regulators noted that such products could theoretically lose 60% in a single day. Additionally, these ETFs face risks like time decay in volatile markets, liquidity spirals during mass redemptions, and extreme price dislocations from market-making failures, as seen in early June when an ETF moved opposite to its underlying stock. The trading is predominantly driven by retail investors, with institutional capital largely absent due to the products' high volatility. Analysts caution that with the semiconductor sector at elevated valuations and facing geopolitical and supply chain uncertainties, leveraged ETFs pose a substantial threat of amplified losses for uninformed investors.

marsbit1 h fa

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

marsbit1 h fa

18 Months, Over 50x Surge: KIOXIA's Epic Comeback

KIOXIA, a NAND flash memory giant, staged a dramatic comeback driven by AI demand. After a period of significant losses, a failed merger, and missed HBM opportunities, its 2024 IPO began modestly. However, fueled by explosive demand for AI data storage, its stock price skyrocketed over 50 times within 18 months, making it Japan's most valuable company, surpassing Toyota. Its Q1 FY2026 profit guidance soared 30-fold year-over-year, with 2026 NAND capacity already sold out. Key to its success is its 3D NAND technology, BiCS FLASH. As the inventor of NAND, KIOXIA advanced its technology through generations, reaching over 200 layers by 2023. Key innovations include CBA (CMOS directly Bonded to Array), which separately manufactures control circuits and memory arrays for better performance, and OPS (On Pitch Select Gate) to increase density. The company is now developing high-capacity packages like an 8TB solution stacking 32 dies. Looking beyond NAND, KIOXIA is exploring 3D DRAM with its OCTRAM technology, using oxide semiconductor transistors for ultra-low leakage to reduce power consumption. This fundamental research differs from HBM and represents a long-term bet to extend its 3D expertise from NAND into future DRAM architectures. KIOXIA's story highlights how technological assets and shifting market cycles can rapidly transform a company's fortunes. While questions remain about sustaining growth beyond the current AI boom, its resurgence demonstrates that in semiconductors, being down does not necessarily mean being out.

marsbit1 h fa

18 Months, Over 50x Surge: KIOXIA's Epic Comeback

marsbit1 h fa

Market Trends in U.S. Stocks (June 23): Peak at Listing? SpaceX Loses Over $800 Billion in Three Days, Tech Stocks Experience Severe Internal Divergence

Stock Market Trends (June 23): Did SpaceX Peak at IPO? The company loses over $800 billion in market value in three days as a sharp divergence unfolds within the tech sector. SpaceX's post-IPO decline of over 20%, falling below its first-day close, reflects a swift market repricing. The catalyst is a clear shift in narrative from "AI platform potential" to concerns over rising capital costs, as its $8.57 billion IPO and subsequent $20 billion debt offering are earmarked for acquisitions and refinancing existing bridge loans rather than de-leveraging. While high-valuation tech stocks like Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft faced pressure, Micron surged nearly 7% to a record high following a strategic supply deal with Anthropic for HBM and memory, highlighting robust, tangible demand in AI infrastructure. The broader market saw funds rotate into more defensive industrial and financial names. Macro factors included a dip in oil prices to a three-month low on news of a US-Iran framework deal, though logistical hurdles for resuming full Strait of Hormuz shipments remain. Key events ahead include Nvidia's shareholder meeting, Micron's earnings, and the May PCE inflation data. The latter will be crucial in determining whether the sell-off in high-valuation growth stocks, which appears to have just begun, will persist.

marsbit2 h fa

Market Trends in U.S. Stocks (June 23): Peak at Listing? SpaceX Loses Over $800 Billion in Three Days, Tech Stocks Experience Severe Internal Divergence

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures