South Korea Delays Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2025-12-31Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-31

Introduzione

South Korea has postponed the implementation of its Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 due to regulatory disagreements, primarily between the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea, over stablecoin oversight. The legislation, intended to establish a foundational crypto regulatory framework, aims to enhance investor protection through stricter rules, including no-fault liability for operators and reserve requirements for stablecoin issuers. However, disputes over enforcement authority and reserve management have stalled progress, creating uncertainty for crypto firms. The ruling party has proposed consolidating various proposals into a revised bill, with a focus on developing a Korean won-backed stablecoin to counter dollar-dominated stablecoins.

South Korea has delayed its Digital Asset Basic Law till 2026, as regulators are still divided over stablecoin oversight authority, as revealed by legislative sources. The policymakers have halted the crypto legislation as the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea carry on clashing over control of stablecoin reserves and enforcement responsibilities, making regulatory uncertainty in one of Asia’s biggest crypto markets.

The Digital Asset Basic Law is made in a way to be the foundation of South Korea’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework. The legislation is focused on strengthening investor protection by putting robust and strict legal regulations on digital asset operators as per the draft bill.

The prominent offer includes the introduction of no-fault liability, making operators responsible for user losses even without determined negligence. The draft also needs stablecoin issuers to keep reserves surpassing 100% of circulating supply kept at banks or dignified institutions and different from the issuer’s balance sheet to restrict contagion risks.

Stablecoin oversight came as the major point of contention between regulators. At the same time, the authorities widely agree on the requirement of stronger supervision; they haven’t reached consensus on the basis of responsibilities for preserved rule enforcement and licensing authority.

The Non-Agreement

The non-agreement has entangled decisions over enforcement powers with the treatment of reserve assets, pushing authorities to delay the bill instead of advancing legislation having unresolved structural issues.

The delay further creates an uncertainty for crypto firms of South Korea, together with exchanges, payment providers and stablecoin issuers. If the regulatory framework is not complete, then it may affect the product launches, investment decisions, and operational planning, as said by industry observers.

The ruling party has planned to consolidate various policymaker proposals into a revised digital asset bill. The president of the Democratic Party, Lee Jae Myung, has recognised that a Korean won-supported stablecoin is a national priority, declaring it could be against the dominance of US dollar-linked stablecoins in global crypto markets, as per the statements from the presidential office.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Slides Below $90K as Spot BTC ETFs Record $780M in Outflows

Domande pertinenti

QWhy has South Korea delayed the implementation of its Digital Asset Basic Law until 2026?

ASouth Korea has delayed the Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 because regulators, specifically the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea, are divided over stablecoin oversight authority, including control of stablecoin reserves and enforcement responsibilities.

QWhat is the primary purpose of the Digital Asset Basic Law according to the draft bill?

AThe primary purpose of the Digital Asset Basic Law is to serve as the foundation of South Korea's cryptocurrency regulatory framework, with a focus on strengthening investor protection by imposing robust and strict legal regulations on digital asset operators.

QWhat are two key provisions included in the draft of the Digital Asset Basic Law?

ATwo key provisions are: 1) The introduction of no-fault liability, making operators responsible for user losses even without determined negligence. 2) A requirement for stablecoin issuers to keep reserves exceeding 100% of the circulating supply, held at banks or dignified institutions and kept separate from the issuer's balance sheet.

QHow does the regulatory delay impact crypto firms in South Korea?

AThe delay creates uncertainty for crypto firms, including exchanges, payment providers, and stablecoin issuers. It may affect their product launches, investment decisions, and operational planning until a complete regulatory framework is established.

QWhat national priority regarding stablecoins was recognized by the president of the Democratic Party, Lee Jae Myung?

ALee Jae Myung recognized the creation of a Korean won-supported stablecoin as a national priority, stating it could counter the dominance of US dollar-linked stablecoins in global crypto markets.

Letture associate

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit53 min fa

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbit58 min fa

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbit58 min fa

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbit59 min fa

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbit59 min fa

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinist1 h fa

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbit3 h fa

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures