South Dakota revives Bitcoin reserve plan with 10% allocation cap – Details

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-28

Introduzione

South Dakota Representative Logan Manhart has revived a legislative effort, House Bill 1155, to allow the state to allocate up to 10% of its revenues into Bitcoin. The bill includes strict security measures for storing private keys and represents a cautious, incremental approach to treating Bitcoin as a legitimate public asset. This move aligns with a growing trend among states like Texas, Arizona, and New Hampshire, which are pursuing their own digital asset strategies amid delays in federal action. The proposal underscores a shift toward state-level adoption as a long-term inflation hedge, reflecting the broader bullish market sentiment around Bitcoin.

While Washington dangles the promise of a federal strategic reserve, South Dakota is tired of waiting.

Representative Logan Manhart (R) has officially revived a legislative push that could fundamentally alter the state’s balance sheet.

On the 27th of January, Manhart introduced House Bill 1155, an ambitious measure that would empower the State Investment Council to allocate up to 10% of state revenues directly into Bitcoin.

South Dakota’s second Bitcoin Reserve attempt

The move is more than just a second attempt at a stalled 2025 proposal.

If passed, HB 1155 would not just allow South Dakota to hold Bitcoin [BTC] but also require strict security rules, with private keys stored across multiple, geographically separate data centers under direct government control.

By limiting the allocation to 10%, the state is taking a cautious, step-by-step approach.

The goal is to gradually treat Bitcoin as a legitimate public asset, similar to what Texas and Arizona are already doing. Thus, reintroducing HB 1155 shows that South Dakota’s view of digital assets is evolving.

Other states and their Bitcoin Reserve plans

South Dakota isn’t the only state that’s tired of waiting around for Washington, as several other states are also moving in the same direction.

New Hampshire already allows up to 5% of certain state funds to be invested in digital assets, while Texas and Arizona have passed laws to include Bitcoin in state reserves.

Florida is also considering a similar bill aimed at using digital assets as an inflation hedge.

However, at the federal level, creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is still a key goal for the current administration.

Patrick Witt, Director of the White House Crypto Council, has already acknowledged that legal complications have slowed progress.

As a result, the federal plan currently depends mainly on Bitcoin seized by the Department of Justice, rather than new purchases.

What’s more?

This came at a time when BTC was trading around $89,199 at press time as per CoinMarketCap, with the Bitcoin crypto sentiment standing bullish at 81%.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin Dominance also stood at 59.55% as per TradingView, reflecting continued investor preference for the asset.

All this put together showed that the market entered 2026 with a focus on fundamentals. And with this bill, South Dakota is choosing to act rather than wait.

Final Thoughts

Rather than chasing price, South Dakota is legislating infrastructure for long-term exposure.
HB 1155 reflects a broader trend of states testing Bitcoin before federal execution materializes.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of House Bill 1155 introduced in South Dakota?

AHouse Bill 1155 is an ambitious measure that would empower the State Investment Council to allocate up to 10% of state revenues directly into Bitcoin, treating it as a legitimate public asset.

QHow does South Dakota's proposed Bitcoin allocation compare to the approach of other states like New Hampshire?

ASouth Dakota's bill allows for an allocation of up to 10% of state revenues, which is a higher cap than New Hampshire, which allows up to 5% of certain state funds to be invested in digital assets.

QWhat security measures are mandated for Bitcoin holdings under the proposed South Dakota bill?

AThe bill requires strict security rules, with private keys stored across multiple, geographically separate data centers under direct government control.

QWhat is the current status of the federal government's plan for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve according to the article?

AThe federal plan for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve has been slowed by legal complications and currently depends mainly on Bitcoin seized by the Department of Justice, rather than new purchases.

QWhat broader trend does the reintroduction of HB 1155 represent among U.S. states?

AHB 1155 reflects a broader trend of states like Texas, Arizona, and Florida testing Bitcoin integration and creating infrastructure for long-term exposure before a federal execution materializes.

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 h fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 h fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist1 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 h fa

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures