Solana – What to expect when bullish fundamentals meet bearish market reality

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-08

Introduzione

Tokenized gold trading volumes surged to record highs amid recent U.S.-Iran tensions, potentially positioning Solana as a major beneficiary due to its fast network and strong infrastructure. Institutional interest in Solana has grown, supported by ETF inflows, payment sector adoption, and the positive impact of the CLARITY Act. However, despite strong long-term fundamentals, the current bear market is exerting significant pressure. Key on-chain metrics, including a spike in Coin Days Destroyed and increased exchange inflows, suggest rising sell pressure. Additionally, long-term holders have recently begun selling, indicating a likely continuation of bearish momentum. Short-term price movement above $100 appears unlikely, as holders are expected to take profits amid the downturn.

Tokenized gold hit record trading volumes amid ongoing U.S.-Iran tensions recently. In fact, it was reportedly 290% above the previous record. Tokenization could be one of the biggest victors from the CLARITY Act.

As a result, Solana [SOL] could be a winner. AMBCrypto recently argued that its fast network and robust blockchain infrastructure would allow it to grab a large share of the tokenization volume.

Institutional bets on Solana have grown lately. Strong ETF inflows and greater traction in the payments sector, combined with the CLARITY bull thesis for the altcoin, give a strong bullish base for long-term investors.

And yet, long-term conviction does not negate the fact that the market is going through a tough bear market right now. Deeper price drawdowns might be likely for assets across the market.

On-chain signals show sell pressure on Solana

The biggest sign in favor of the bears was on the Coin Days Destroyed. The metric tracks if long-dormant coins are moving in high numbers.

It saw massive spike on 05 March, right as the price tested the $90-resistance level.

The spike in token movement came alongside a hike in exchange inflows over the past month. By itself, rising inflows allude to potential for selling pressure. The capitulation below $100 towards the end of January precipitated this trend.

Combined with the CDD spike, it hinted at an imminent selling wave for SOL traders to beware of.

Finally, the HODLer net position change metric tracks the behavior of long-term holders. Since December, the metric has shown that HODLers were accumulating, reflected in the green bars on the histogram.

It transitioned to negative over the last few days though – Evidence that long-term holders were cashing out their SOL. It may be another mark of confirmation on the already bearish SOL price action.

Taken together, it would be unlikely that short-term Solana momentum would take it past $100. Instead, it appeared increasingly likely that holders will use the move to take profits.


Final Summary

  • Solana has strong fundamentals, and its status as a fast blockchain means it could see sustained growth in the tokenization of real-world assets on the chain.
  • While multi-year conviction remains strong, it does not overrule the prevailing bear market dynamics.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the key bullish fundamentals supporting Solana's long-term growth potential?

ASolana's bullish fundamentals include its fast network and robust blockchain infrastructure, which position it to capture a significant share of the growing tokenization market, particularly for real-world assets like gold. Additionally, institutional bets have increased through strong ETF inflows, greater traction in the payments sector, and positive momentum from the CLARITY Act bull thesis.

QWhat on-chain metrics indicated increased sell pressure for Solana in the short term?

AKey on-chain metrics signaling sell pressure included a massive spike in Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) on March 5th, indicating long-dormant coins were moving, alongside a sustained increase in exchange inflows over the past month. The HODLer net position change metric also turned negative, showing long-term holders were cashing out their SOL holdings.

QWhy did the article suggest that Solana's price was unlikely to break past $100 in the short term?

AThe combination of heightened sell pressure from the CDD spike, increased exchange inflows, and long-term holders cashing out made it unlikely for Solana to surpass $100. Instead, the price movement was seen as an opportunity for profit-taking rather than a sustained bullish breakout.

QHow did the tokenization of gold and the CLARITY Act contribute to Solana's bullish thesis?

ATokenized gold hit record trading volumes amid geopolitical tensions, and the CLARITY Act is expected to be a major catalyst for asset tokenization. Solana's fast and efficient blockchain makes it a prime candidate to handle increased tokenization volume, driving long-term bullish sentiment.

QWhat was the long-term bullish conviction for Solana despite the bearish market reality?

ADespite the prevailing bear market causing price drawdowns, long-term conviction remained strong due to Solana's fundamental strengths: its technological advantages in speed and infrastructure, growing institutional interest via ETFs, expansion in payments, and the potential massive adoption of real-world asset tokenization on its network.

Letture associate

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit34 min fa

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit34 min fa

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit1 h fa

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片