Solana Price Stays Under Pressure As 1.4M Tokens Flow To Exchanges

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-04-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-06

Introduzione

The Solana price is facing significant downward pressure, exacerbated by a major DeFi exploit that resulted in over $270 million in outflows from the ecosystem. On-chain data reveals a bearish signal as 1.4 million SOL tokens, valued at approximately $110 million, were transferred to centralized exchanges within a 72-hour period. This substantial increase in exchange inflows is often a precursor to heightened selling pressure, as investors move assets to exchanges to offload them. Consequently, the Solana price, which had already dropped below the key $80 support level after a local high of $85, remains under strain. At the time of writing, SOL is trading around $80.80, showing little change over 24 hours but down more than 3% over the past week.

The cryptocurrency market has indeed seen better days than the past week, but the Solana price has particularly struggled to contend with the broad downward pressure. This sluggish price action could be linked to the major DeFi exploit that rocked the ecosystem, causing the outflow of more than $270 million in value. According to the latest on-chain data, the Solana price could see even further pressure as exchange inflows spike.

$110 Million Of SOL Flow To Centralized Exchanges In 3 Days

In an April 4th post on the social media platform X, crypto analyst Ali Martinez shared that significant amounts of the Solana token have been moved to centralized exchanges over the past few days. This on-chain observation has caused a warning alarm to go off on the potential price trajectory of SOL, especially considering the already not-so-optimistic market climate.

The relevant indicator here is the Exchange Balance metric, which tracks the amount of a particular cryptocurrency available on centralized exchanges at a given time. This on-chain metric provides some level of insight into the current demand and supply dynamics in the crypto open market.

Hence, a rise in the value of this metric suggests that more market participants are sending assets to exchanges, which could imply that supply might be overwhelming the available demand. This trend could be bearish for an asset’s value (the Solana price, in this case), as it could be an indication of increasing selling pressure.

Source: @alicharts on X

According to Glassnode data highlighted by Martinez, 1.40 million Solana, valued at approximately $110 million, were transferred to centralized exchanges in the last 72 hours. As inferred earlier, coin movements of this magnitude are often red flags in the market, as they could be a potential source of bearish pressure on price.

The rationale behind this conclusion is that one of the major services offered by centralized exchanges is a platform for investors and traders to offload their digital assets. Hence, this latest increase in the exchange inflow can be linked to a rise in selling pressure on the Solana price.

Solana Price At A Glance

Interestingly, the Solana price fell below the psychological $80 support after reaching the local high of around $85. As of this writing, the price of SOL stands at around $80.8, reflecting no significant change in the past 24 hours. According to data from CoinGecko, the altcoin’s value has been down by more than 3% in the past seven days.


The price of Solana on the daily timeframe | Source: SOLUSDT chart on TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason for the recent downward pressure on the Solana (SOL) price mentioned in the article?

AThe main reason for the downward pressure is a spike in exchange inflows, with 1.4 million SOL tokens (worth ~$110 million) being moved to centralized exchanges in the last 72 hours, indicating potential increased selling pressure.

QAccording to the on-chain data shared by analyst Ali Martinez, how many SOL tokens were sent to exchanges in a 3-day period?

AAccording to the on-chain data from Glassnode, 1.40 million SOL tokens were transferred to centralized exchanges in the last 72 hours.

QWhat does a rise in the 'Exchange Balance' metric typically indicate for a cryptocurrency's price?

AA rise in the Exchange Balance metric suggests that more market participants are depositing assets to exchanges, which can imply that supply is overwhelming demand. This is often a bearish signal as it indicates increasing selling pressure.

QWhat was the value of the SOL tokens that flowed into exchanges, and what was the time frame for this movement?

AThe value of the SOL tokens that flowed into exchanges was approximately $110 million, and this movement occurred over a 72-hour (3-day) period.

QAt what price level did Solana find psychological support after falling from its local high?

ASolana found psychological support at the $80 price level after falling from its local high of around $85.

Letture associate

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手2 min fa

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手2 min fa

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbit33 min fa

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbit33 min fa

From Identity Protocol to AI Gateway: How Ambitious Is World?

The article discusses Worldcoin's (WLD) evolution from a "proof of personhood" network to a potential identity infrastructure for the AI era. Initially focused on unique digital identities via iris scans, Worldcoin faced skepticism over real-world use cases. However, entering "The Simple Plan" Phase 3, it's shifting from token incentives to utility-driven growth. Key applications are emerging: enterprise solutions (e.g., deepfake verification with Zoom, Okta), consumer use cases (e.g., reducing bots on Tinder or in ticket sales), and notably, the AI Agent sector via AgentKit, which aims to establish trusted authorization between humans and AI agents. The author argues AI's proliferation makes authentic human identity a scarce and valuable resource. Worldcoin's strategy is now focused on key markets for network effects and developing self-service Orb hardware to scale sustainably. The launch of World ID 4.0 introduces a fee model for issuers/protocols, creating a potential revenue stream. In conclusion, WLD's rise reflects a market reassessment. Worldcoin's ambition is to become the foundational identity layer and crucial entry point for the coming AI Agent economy, moving crypto narratives beyond finance into verifiable human identity.

marsbit1 h fa

From Identity Protocol to AI Gateway: How Ambitious Is World?

marsbit1 h fa

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbit1 h fa

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbit1 h fa

BTC Market Pulse: Week 25

Bitcoin is attempting a modest rebound from oversold levels, but structural data indicates stabilization, not a trend reversal. Key shifts include a move from selling to buying pressure in perpetual futures and a near-flattening of spot selling. However, the bounce lacks conviction, evidenced by a 40% drop in spot volume and declining open interest, suggesting it is driven by short covering rather than new bullish bets. Market fear has receded sharply, with volatility spreads collapsing and ETF outflows narrowing. On-chain activity is subdued, with falling transaction volumes and continued capital exit. While capitulation is slowing and the supply is shifting to longer-term holders, profitability remains stressed. The overall picture is of a market building a consolidation base, lacking the volume and fresh institutional capital needed for a confirmed reversal.

insights.glassnode1 h fa

insights.glassnode1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures