SODAX has enabled cross-chain funding for Flint vaults

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-28

Introduzione

Flint, an investment platform for tokenized RWA (Real World Assets), has integrated SODAX — infrastructure for cross-chain routing and conversion of crypto assets. Users can now fund their investment vaults using assets from over 20 blockchain networks. Flint invests the raised funds into tokenized real-world assets, including real-estate backed bonds and private credit instruments. Operating on Lagoon Finance's infrastructure with asset selection by 9Summits, Flint's vaults provide users with non-custodial access to tokenized, real-estate-backed debt via audited smart contracts. The vaults accept USDC and currently target an annual yield of approximately 10%, with USDC-denominated rewards distributed weekly. The SODAX integration consolidates cross-chain asset transfers and vault funding into a single transaction. This eliminates the need for users to manually bridge or swap assets between blockchains, allowing them to fund Flint vaults directly from supported EVM and non-EVM networks.

Flint, a platform for investing in tokenized RWAs, has integrated SODAX — an infrastructure for cross-chain routing and conversion of crypto assets. Users can now fund investment vaults with assets from over 20 blockchain networks. Flint invests the raised capital into tokenized real-world assets, including real-estate-backed bonds and private credit instruments.

Flint's vaults operate on the Lagoon Finance infrastructure, with asset selection managed by 9Summits. They provide users with non-custodial access to tokenized real estate-backed debt via audited smart contracts. The vaults accept $USDC and are currently targeting an annual yield of around 10%. Yield is paid out in $USDC on a weekly basis.

The integration of SODAX combines cross-chain asset transfers and vault funding into a single operation. Users no longer need to manually convert or bridge assets between blockchains — they can fund Flint vaults directly with assets from supported EVM and non-EVM networks.

Image: Magnific

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main benefit for users after Flint integrated with SODAX?

AUsers can now fund their investment vaults directly with assets from over 20 different blockchain networks without needing to manually bridge or convert assets themselves.

QWhat types of real-world assets does Flint invest in?

AFlint invests in tokenized real-world assets including real estate-backed bonds and private credit instruments.

QWhat infrastructure powers Flint's vaults, and who is responsible for asset selection?

AFlint's vaults operate on the Lagoon Finance infrastructure, and asset selection is managed by 9Summits.

QIn what cryptocurrency are Flint vaults currently denominated and how is the yield paid out?

AThe vaults accept USDC, target an annual yield of approximately 10%, and pay the yield in USDC on a weekly basis.

QWhat is the primary function of SODAX in this context?

ASODAX is an infrastructure for cross-chain routing and crypto asset conversion, which combines asset bridging across networks and vault funding into a single operation for Flint users.

Letture associate

Attention Bitcoin Investors! Analytical Company Reveals the Levels That Will Determine BTC's Fate! Will It Reach the $100,000 Mark?

Bitcoin Investors Alert: Analysis Firm Reveals Key Levels That Will Determine BTC's Fate! Will It Reach $100,000? Bitcoin recently rose above $81,000 before dropping to around $78,000 following hawkish comments from the Federal Reserve, later recovering to over $79,000. Amid market speculation on Bitcoin's ($BTC) future trend, analytical firm Alphractal has provided an updated assessment using its proprietary "Structured Market Bands" metric. This on-chain indicator calculates support and resistance zones based on UTXO movements and realized cost. According to Alphractal, with BTC above approximately $79,000, the key structural levels are as follows: - Upper Structural Resistance Band: $100,570 - Lower Structural Resistance Band: $75,024 - Upper Structural Support Band: $63,284 - Lower Structural Support Band: $57,228 The firm states that BTC breaking above the lower resistance band of $75,024 indicates it is now moving within the next upper supply zone. It is currently about 27.7% below the $100,570 resistance level. This structure suggests that as the price advances within the resistance zone, selling pressure could intensify. Analysts also noted that these structural bands are trending upward over time. For instance, the lower resistance band has risen from $72,569 on August 9th to $75,024 currently. In conclusion, Bitcoin's ability to hold above the $75,000 level makes the upper resistance zone near $100,000 a key market target. Conversely, a drop below $75,000 could lead to a retest of support levels, particularly in the $63,000-$57,000 range. *This is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Attention Bitcoin Investors! Analytical Company Reveals the Levels That Will Determine BTC's Fate! Will It Reach the $100,000 Mark?

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Solana's Historic First Governance Vote Concludes: Why Did SGP-003 Spark Massive Controversy?

Solana has completed its first-ever formal on-chain governance vote, marking a shift towards decentralized decision-making. Three proposals, SGP-0001, SGP-0002, and SGP-0003, were voted on. SGP-0001, establishing the foundational governance framework, and SGP-0002, accelerating the reduction of SOL's inflation rate, both passed. However, the most contentious proposal, SGP-0003, failed to reach the required supermajority. SGP-0003 proposed a significant change to Solana's fee structure, introducing a variable "Resource Fee" based on computational unit (CU) consumption, which would be entirely burned. Supporters, including some core developers, argued it would create fairer resource pricing and increase SOL's deflationary pressure. Opponents, led by major DeFi applications like Jupiter and Drift, criticized it as an effective tax on complex applications, warning it would unpredictably increase operational costs and undermine business models built on Solana's low fees. The vote outcome highlights a critical tension within Solana's growing ecosystem: balancing the interests of SOL holders (through deflationary mechanisms), validators (through rewards), and application developers (through cost predictability). As Solana evolves from a high-performance blockchain to one hosting substantial economic activity, governance is becoming central to its future development and competitiveness.

marsbit2 h fa

Solana's Historic First Governance Vote Concludes: Why Did SGP-003 Spark Massive Controversy?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片