Secures Over $60 Million in Funding from Dragonfly, Sequoia, and Others. An In-Depth Look at the On-Chain Derivatives Protocol Variational | CryptoSeed

链捕手Pubblicato 2026-05-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-22

Introduzione

Variational, a decentralized derivatives trading platform, has raised over $61.8 million in total funding, including a recent $50 million Series A led by Dragonfly Capital. Investors include Sequoia Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Bain Capital Crypto, and Hack VC. The platform, with over $810 million in Open Interest (ranking 4th among on-chain derivatives protocols), is founded by Lucas Schuermann and Edward Yu. Both are Columbia University graduates and former partners at quant fund Qu Capital. They later held senior roles at Genesis Trading, handling billions in trading volume. The broader team includes talent from Google, Meta, and top trading firms like Jane Street. Operating on Arbitrum, Variational distinguishes itself by aggregating external liquidity from CEXs, DEXs, and traditional market makers using an RFQ (Request-for-Quote) model, positioning itself more as a broker than an exchange like Hyperliquid. Its dual product line features Omni for retail users (offering up to 50x leverage on ~450+ crypto and TradFi pairs) and Pro for institutional OTC trading. Currently in a pre-TGE phase, Variational has launched an "Omni Points" system, with 50% of its upcoming $VAR token supply allocated for community incentives through trading-based rewards and referrals until Q3 2026.

Author: momo, ChainCatcher

Recently, the decentralized derivatives trading platform Variational announced the completion of a $50 million Series A financing round led by Dragonfly. Combined with three previous funding rounds, Variational has raised a cumulative total of $61.8 million. Its investor lineup is quite impressive, including not only Dragonfly but also renowned institutions such as Sequoia Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Bain Capital Crypto, Hack VC, and others.

According to DeFiLlama data, the open interest (OI) on Variational has exceeded $810 million. While there remains a significant gap compared to Hyperliquid's $9.4 billion, its OI currently ranks fourth among on-chain derivatives protocols.

In the fiercely competitive decentralized derivatives sector, why has Variational continued to secure backing from top-tier institutions? What is the team's background? What are its differentiated approaches? This article provides a brief overview.

What is the team's background?

In terms of team background and entrepreneurial experience, Variational and Hyperliquid share several similarities: both teams graduated from prestigious universities, come from quantitative trading backgrounds, founded quantitative funds, and subsequently transitioned to building on-chain derivatives platforms.

However, unlike Hyperliquid's early mystique and anonymous team approach, Variational discloses its founding team's background and entrepreneurial journey in its whitepaper.

Variational was co-founded by Lucas Schuermann and Edward Yu. CEO Lucas graduated from Columbia University and was previously responsible for trading systems engineering architecture; Edward Yu has a Chinese background and was originally a quantitative analyst. The two met while studying and conducting research in the engineering department at Columbia University and co-founded the quantitative hedge fund Qu Capital in 2017.

In 2019, Qu Capital was acquired by Digital Currency Group. Subsequently, both joined Genesis Trading: Lucas served as Vice President of Engineering, and Edward Yu served as Vice President of Quantitative Trading.

According to the whitepaper, before leaving Genesis in 2021, their team had processed trading volumes in the hundreds of billions of dollars. After leaving, they founded their proprietary trading firm, Variational, and secured $10 million in funding.

In the following years, the team operated proprietary trading strategies while integrating with mainstream CEX and DEX trading interfaces. Later, based on their own trading business and system experience, they began developing and operating the Variational Protocol.

Additionally, Variational's development and quantitative team members also hail from technology and quantitative institutions such as Google, Meta, Virtu Financial, IMC Trading, and Jane Street. The whitepaper states that core technical team members generally possess over a decade of experience in software engineering or quantitative research.

What are its product features? How does it differ from Hyperliquid?

Judging from the trading interface, there isn't a significant difference between Variational and Hyperliquid. The platform currently lists approximately 450 trading pairs, mainly covering cryptocurrency and TradFi assets, offering users leverage up to 50x. The TradFi section is currently in Beta testing. According to official disclosures, the TradFi market will list over 100 trading pairs.

However, in its press release, Variational emphasizes a distinctly different positioning from Hyperliquid.

Variational describes its model as more akin to a brokerage rather than another exchange in the style of Hyperliquid. Its target users are not limited to crypto-native traders; it aims to make the on-chain derivatives trading experience closer to traditional markets through zero-fee trading and liquidity aggregation.

Currently operating on Arbitrum, Variational employs a dual-product-line model. The Omni version primarily targets retail users, positioned as a perpetual contracts trading product aggregating liquidity from multiple sources, while the Pro version caters to institutional over-the-counter derivatives trading.

The most significant difference from Hyperliquid lies in order matching and liquidity mechanisms. Hyperliquid relies on its self-built L1 chain and a public central limit order book (CLOB), with market makers or the HLP treasury within the protocol competing to provide quotes, and traders paying maker/taker fees. In contrast, Variational uses an RFQ (Request for Quote) model, with a single liquidity provider as the counterparty. It does not rely on on-chain internal market making but instead aggregates external liquidity in real-time from sources like CEXs, DEXs, OTC channels, and traditional financial market makers, managing risk through hedging.

The rationale for choosing this differentiated path, according to Variational CEO Lucas, is that on-chain liquidity still lags far behind traditional trading venues like the CME, and order book models face a "cold start" problem. Aggregating liquidity from external sources avoids the need to rebuild liquidity from scratch on-chain.

What is the current stage? What participation opportunities are available?

Variational is currently still in the Pre-TGE stage; the $VAR token has not been issued. The project initially planned a TGE in Q1 2025, which has since been postponed. No new definitive TGE date has been officially announced.

In December 2025, Variational launched the Omni Points points system. The official statement indicates that 50% of the $VAR supply will be allocated for community incentives, distributed gradually through mechanisms like Points rather than a one-time airdrop.

Regarding points, 3 million points have been retroactively distributed to early users. Subsequently, points are distributed every Friday based on the previous week's trading snapshot. The points program is scheduled to conclude by Q3 2026 at the latest.

The main current participation opportunity is to engage in perpetual contracts trading on the Omni platform. Trading volume is the core factor for earning points, with additional point bonuses available for holding positions over time and referring others.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the total funding amount raised by the decentralized derivatives platform Variational, and who led its Series A round?

AVariational has raised a total of $61.8 million. Its Series A round of $50 million was led by Dragonfly.

QWhat are the key differences between Variational and its competitor Hyperliquid in terms of their operational models?

AThe key difference lies in their order matching and liquidity mechanisms. Hyperliquid relies on its own L1 blockchain with a public Central Limit Order Book (CLOB). Variational uses an RFQ (Request for Quote) model, acting as a single liquidity provider counterparty that aggregates external liquidity from CEXs, DEXs, OTC channels, and TradFi market makers, then manages risk through hedging.

QWhat is the professional background of Variational's founding team prior to starting the protocol?

ACo-founders Lucas Schuermann and Edward Yu met at Columbia University. They co-founded the quantitative hedge fund Qu Capital in 2017, which was later acquired by Digital Currency Group. They then joined Genesis Trading, where Lucas served as VP of Engineering and Edward Yu as VP of Quantitative Trading, before leaving in 2021 to found Variational.

QWhat is the current stage of Variational's token ($VAR) launch, and how is the project engaging its community?

AVariational is currently in the Pre-TGE stage, and the $VAR token has not been launched yet. The previously planned TGE for Q1 2025 has been postponed with no new official date announced. The project is engaging its community through an 'Omni Points' loyalty program launched in December 2025, with 50% of the $VAR supply designated for community incentives distributed via points and other mechanisms over time.

QOn which blockchain does Variational primarily operate, and what are its two main product lines?

AVariational primarily operates on the Arbitrum blockchain. It follows a dual-product line model: the 'Omni' version targets retail users as a perpetual contracts trading product aggregating liquidity from multiple sources, while the 'Pro' version is designed for institutional over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives trading.

Letture associate

Top Trader Explains the Logic Behind Bitcoin's Surge: What Is the Market Actually Trading?

Summary: On August 19th, the U.S. Treasury announced an increase in its long-term bond repurchase program from $2 billion to at least $4 billion. While the direct scale is small relative to the overall market, the move triggered a decline in long-term Treasury yields and a weaker dollar, with Bitcoin subsequently breaking above $70,000. In an interview, Arthur Hayes argues this Bitcoin rally is not primarily driven by internal crypto regulatory news (like the CLARITY Act), but by a shift in macro expectations regarding U.S. liquidity policy. Hayes interprets the Treasury's timing—acting as long-term yields hit multi-decade highs—as a signal that policymakers are sensitive to rising financing costs. He posits that Bitcoin acts as a "pressure release valve" for global liquidity shifts. The market is not trading the $4 billion repurchase itself, but the *expectation* of further, more aggressive interventions (like yield curve control or Fed balance sheet expansion) should long-term interest rates continue to rise threateningly. His logic follows a chain: unsustainable U.S. debt requires stable Treasury market function; if yields rise too high, policymakers will intervene to provide liquidity; increased dollar liquidity ultimately benefits scarce assets like Bitcoin. Hayes speculates on more extreme scenarios, such as foreign central banks selling Treasuries back to the Fed via facilities like FIMA Repo, further expanding liquidity. The key takeaway is that Bitcoin's price action is being driven by anticipation of future monetary policy responses to debt and yield pressures, rather than immediate liquidity injections or crypto-specific regulation. The critical indicator to watch is long-term Treasury yields (e.g., 10-year near 5%). If they rise again, prompting further Treasury/Fed action and dollar weakness, Hayes's thesis strengthens. If yields stabilize without major policy escalation, the current bullish narrative may be an overreaction. Bitcoin is effectively trading on the probability of renewed, significant liquidity expansion by U.S. authorities.

marsbit4 min fa

Top Trader Explains the Logic Behind Bitcoin's Surge: What Is the Market Actually Trading?

marsbit4 min fa

This Week in Crypto Watch｜Grayscale Zcash ETF Goes Live Today, Virtuals Lands Solana AI Agent Ownership

This week in crypto, Grayscale's Zcash Trust (ZEC) is set to debut as the first U.S. spot ETF directly holding a privacy coin, pending approvals. The ZEC price surged over 70% ahead of the anticipated listing. Meanwhile, Virtuals Protocol has expanded to Solana, enabling users to own and tokenize AI Agents. Its Automated Capital Formation mechanism has raised over $6.8M for Agents. In macro news, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent launched "Operation Economic Outcast," a major financial offensive targeting Iran, with digital assets named as a key focus area. Kinetiq announced Elysium, an EVM L2 for Hyperliquid, where 50% of sequencer fees will fund KNTQ buybacks and burns. Polygon co-founder Sandeep Nailwal is advancing a staking and tokenomics overhaul, which could nearly double staking rewards for POL holders. Other notable updates include NEAR's plans for confidential perps, Extended's European compliance strategy, and Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's upcoming key speech at Jackson Hole.

marsbit5 min fa

This Week in Crypto Watch｜Grayscale Zcash ETF Goes Live Today, Virtuals Lands Solana AI Agent Ownership

marsbit5 min fa

Two South Koreans Told Me: Only a Few Semiconductor Employees Got Raises, and Making Money in the Stock Market Is Just a 'Shuangwen'

Title: "Two Koreans tell me: Semiconductor salary hikes are for the few, and stock market profits are just feel-good fiction." Summary: During a recent dramatic boom and subsequent volatility in the South Korean stock market, fueled by a major semiconductor rally, perceptions of widespread societal euphoria and worker benefits are largely exaggerated, according to interviews with a manager at Samsung's semiconductor division and a medical aesthetics clinic owner. The "golden era for Korean investors" narrative, popular online, misrepresents the typically reserved Korean social culture, where people rarely openly celebrate financial gains. While increased market participation is real, it stems more from policy shifts away from real estate and media hype than collective狂欢. Within the semiconductor industry itself, the high-profile union negotiations and strikes do not reflect the situation for most employees. Unions in Korea often represent a privileged minority rather than the general workforce, and recent wage competition primarily benefits core researchers and management, not ordinary staff. The business growth mainly leads to more hires, not significantly higher pay for existing employees. The market surge attracted many inexperienced retail investors, some using loans and leverage to chase quick wealth, particularly in stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix. As markets corrected, these individuals faced severe losses, leading to lifestyle cutbacks. The interviewees note that past low valuations of Korean firms and recent capital inflows contributed to the rally, but the influx of novice investors also amplified the risk. Despite the current volatility, one interviewee remains optimistic about the long-term value of Korean companies and continues investing. The article concludes that the Korean semiconductor wave's realities differ little from those elsewhere, often obscured by cultural misconceptions and the human tendency to believe others are living better.

marsbit1 h fa

Two South Koreans Told Me: Only a Few Semiconductor Employees Got Raises, and Making Money in the Stock Market Is Just a 'Shuangwen'

marsbit1 h fa

Unitree Tech, Is It Worth 240 Billion?

Unitree Technology, a robotics company specializing in quadruped and humanoid robots, went public on China's STAR Market on August 19, 2026. Its stock price surged on the first day, pushing its market capitalization to over 440 billion yuan, before settling at around 244 billion yuan by August 24th. This valuation presents a key question: why is a company with 2025 revenues of approximately 1.7 billion yuan valued so highly? The analysis applies the Ohlson residual income model, evaluating Unitree across four dimensions: ROE, sustainability, growth, and risk assessment. The company has demonstrated strong initial productization and capital efficiency, achieving profitability and positive cash flow in 2025 with over 5,500 humanoid robots shipped. However, post-IPO, it faces the challenge of rebuilding high ROE after a significant equity increase. Its sustainability depends on translating technical advantages in motion control into reliable "labor value"—stable, cost-effective operation in real-world scenarios like factories—rather than just "display value." Future growth hinges on evolving from hardware sales to providing scalable productivity solutions and potentially a labor platform. Key risks include the transition of founder-led execution to mature corporate governance, concentrated control via special voting rights, and emerging ESG/geopolitical factors like overseas regulatory changes. Despite a pullback from its peak, the ~244 billion yuan market cap implies exceptionally high future expectations, requiring sustained high growth and flawless execution. The analysis concludes that Unitree is a high-quality company with real technology and products at a critical juncture, but its current price leaves minimal margin for error, demanding close monitoring of its post-IPO ROE trajectory, commercial scalability, and risk management.

marsbit1 h fa

marsbit1 h fa

Unbelievable! Cosmos Publishes High-Risk Patch Without Prior Notice, Hackers 'Empty' Project Treasuries First

A series of preventable security attacks recently struck multiple Cosmos ecosystem blockchains—including MANTRA, TAC, KiiChain, and Nesa—all built using the Cosmos EVM module. Attackers drained protocol treasury wallets and dumped the stolen tokens, causing assets like KII, TAC, and NES to plunge over 90% within hours. The root cause was a critical security vulnerability. On August 19, Cosmos Labs publicly released version v0.7.2 on GitHub, containing an urgent security patch. However, they failed to privately notify or coordinate with the dependent project teams beforehand, leaving the exploit details openly accessible. This allowed malicious actors to study and execute attacks before most teams could respond. Affected projects like KiiChain criticized Cosmos Labs for bundling the critical fix with unrelated updates and not treating it with the necessary urgency, such as recommending chains to pause operations. The exploit combined three upstream flaws in the Cosmos EVM module, affecting any chain with vesting accounts enabled. Despite some teams, like MANTRA, identifying the issue early, attacks continued for days. Nesa’s token crashed 94% before the team halted its chain. Cosmos Labs eventually issued a belated response, advising chains to pause, but widespread criticism highlighted a severe failure in vulnerability disclosure, patch coordination, and ecosystem communication. This incident underscores deep flaws in Cosmos's security auditing, cross-chain coordination, and emergency response systems, further damaging confidence in an ecosystem already facing significant project departures and declining traction.

marsbit1 h fa

Unbelievable! Cosmos Publishes High-Risk Patch Without Prior Notice, Hackers 'Empty' Project Treasuries First

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot