SEC to Hold Miami Meeting With Crypto Startups and Developers

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-08

Introduzione

The U.S. SEC will hold a meeting in Miami on January 27 with crypto startups and developers to gather feedback before finalizing new regulations. Commissioner Hester Peirce invited small projects to share their challenges and concerns. Under new Chairman Paul Atkins, the SEC is shifting from enforcement-focused actions under former leadership toward clearer rules and direct engagement. The initiative has drawn mixed reactions—some criticize potential delays, while others see it as a constructive step. The approach has increased market confidence, particularly for U.S.-based and compliance-friendly crypto projects, and may give startups a voice in shaping future policies.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced that its Crypto task force will visit Miami on January 27 to meet directly with the early-stage Crypto builders and Startups. The main goal is to listen to the Crypto community and gather feedback before finalizing new Crypto regulations.

Hester Peirce (SEC Commissioner) confirmed the visit and invited small Crypto projects to participate and share their experiences, challenges, and regulatory concerns with the SEC. Under the new SEC Chairman, Paul Atkins, the agency is moving away from “Regulations by enforcement” and focusing more on clear rules and guidance. The SEC is actively engaging in the Crypto industry instead of punishing it. This is a clear shift from the Previous approach under Gary Gensler, which relied heavily on lawsuits and enforcement actions.

SEC Listening Tour Draws Mixed Reactions, Boosts Market Confidence

During the meeting in Miami, the SEC wants to listen to the founders, developers, and startups to understand the real-world problems before writing the rules. They mainly focus on the startups instead of the big firms and discuss their policy challenges and innovations. This follows a December 2025 roundtable on financial privacy and data protection, showing a broader effort to rebuild trust with the Crypto industry.

After the announcement for this Meeting the people are in mixed reactions, like some say that listening tours slow things down and the SEC should reduce red tape faster by taking action sooner instead of talking to the startups. Some Crypto supporters say that this is the most constructive approach the SEC has taken so far and will be a great chance for the Direct conversations, which can lead to better regulations.

This approach from the SEC brings less fear and more confidence in U.S. based Crypto projects and also improved sentiment for Bitcoin and other infrastructure tokens. For the traders, it supports the bullish outlook and is especially positive for compliance-friendly and U.S. focused Crypto projects. Finally, the Startups may get the real voice in shaping future regulations.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Bybit Spot 2025 Highlights Early Listings and First-Mover Trading Gains

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of the SEC's upcoming meeting in Miami with crypto startups and developers?

AThe main purpose is for the SEC to listen to the crypto community and gather feedback before finalizing new crypto regulations.

QWho is the current SEC Chairman mentioned in the article, and how does his approach differ from the previous chairman?

AThe current SEC Chairman is Paul Atkins. His approach moves away from 'regulations by enforcement' and focuses more on clear rules and guidance, which is a shift from the previous approach under Gary Gensler that relied heavily on lawsuits and enforcement actions.

QWhat are the mixed reactions to the SEC's listening tour announcement?

ASome people believe listening tours slow down the regulatory process and that the SEC should reduce red tape faster by taking action sooner. Others view it as the most constructive approach the SEC has taken, providing a great chance for direct conversations that could lead to better regulations.

QHow does the SEC's new approach impact the crypto market sentiment according to the article?

AThe new approach brings less fear and more confidence in U.S.-based crypto projects, improving sentiment for Bitcoin and other infrastructure tokens. It supports a bullish outlook, especially for compliance-friendly and U.S.-focused crypto projects.

QWhat previous event does the article mention as part of the SEC's broader effort to rebuild trust with the crypto industry?

AThe article mentions a December 2025 roundtable on financial privacy and data protection as part of the broader effort to rebuild trust with the crypto industry.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit10 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit10 min fa

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit18 min fa

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit18 min fa

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News22 min fa

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News22 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit29 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit29 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit38 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit38 min fa

Trading

Spot