SEC flags Bitcoin miner hosting services as subject to securities laws

cointelegraphPubblicato 2025-12-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-19

Introduzione

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against Bitcoin mining firm VBit and its founder, Danh Vo, alleging fraud and misappropriation of approximately $48 million in investor funds. The SEC claims that VBit’s third-party mining agreements qualify as securities under the Howey test, arguing that purchasers expected passive income and relied entirely on VBit’s efforts for profits. The agency also accused VBit of operating outside industry standards by pooling hashrate under its control and failing to provide transparency to investors. However, industry experts, such as Blockware Intelligence’s Mitchell Askew, argue that legitimate hosted mining services—where clients buy hardware and electricity without profit-sharing or pooled capital—do not constitute securities. The case reflects lingering enforcement approaches from the Biden administration, though the SEC under Trump has been perceived as more industry-friendly. The outcome may not broadly impact the hosted mining sector, as legitimate operations are considered distinct from investment contracts.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has flagged in a lawsuit that third-party Bitcoin mining hosting services can be a securities offering, a position strongly opposed by one industry executive.

The SEC sued the Bitcoin (BTC) mining company VBit and its founder, Danh Vo, in a Delaware federal court on Wednesday, accusing them of fraud and misappropriating around $48 million in investor funds between 2018 and 2022 by selling a greater number of hosting agreements than there were mining rigs.

“VBit’s Hosting Agreements are investment contracts and therefore securities,” the SEC claimed, arguing that VBit’s investment contracts meet the criteria of the securities-defining Howey test.

A highlighted excerpt of the SEC’s lawsuit claiming VBit’s hosting agreements are securities. Source: SEC

“Investors who purchased Hosting Agreements did so with the expectation of earning passive income and relied exclusively on VBit’s efforts to earn a profit as the investors did not possess, control, or have agency over the mining rigs they purportedly purchased,” the agency claimed.

The SEC’s claim is a rare hangover from how the agency approached enforcement under the Biden administration, which crypto backers have said lumped most cryptocurrencies and businesses under securities laws.

VBit didn’t follow industry standards, SEC alleges

The SEC claimed that Vo’s Bitcoin mining hosting operation fell far short of standard industry practices, with investors unable to track their rigs, and the company retaining full operational control.

VBit also directed hashrate into a mining pool under its control, which appeared to be a defining factor in the SEC’s classification of VBit’s hosted Bitcoin mining agreement as a security.

In the filing, the SEC said: “The fortunes of each investor were purportedly tied to the fortunes of other investors because every investor’s chance of earning a profit was tied directly to the performance of the greater VBit mining pool, and the more investors recruited into the mining pool, the greater the chances of earning more Bitcoins.”

SEC’s view shouldn’t impact hosted Bitcoin mining industry

Mitchell Askew, the head of Blockware Intelligence, told Cointelegraph that pooling hashrate isn’t industry practice for hosted Bitcoin mining service providers.

Related: Bitcoin miners enter ‘harshest margin environment of all time’

“Hosted Bitcoin mining simply means a client purchases a computer and electricity,” he said. “There’s no pooling of capital, no profit-sharing, and no reliance on a promoter to generate returns. Under the Howey test, that is very clearly not a security.”

“I don’t think this affects the hosted mining industry at all. Legitimate hosted mining has no resemblance to an investment contract, and this theory has no legs to stand on.”

The SEC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The SEC’s view that hosted Bitcoin mining can constitute a security is one of the most notable classifications under the Trump administration, which has positioned the SEC to be more supportive of the industry.

Several high-profile crypto investigations that the agency started under the Biden administration have since been dropped, however, many fraud-related lawsuits are ongoing.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main claim made by the SEC in the lawsuit against VBit and its founder?

AThe SEC claims that VBit's Bitcoin mining hosting agreements are investment contracts and therefore securities, as they meet the criteria of the Howey test.

QHow did VBit allegedly misuse investor funds according to the SEC?

AVBit and its founder Danh Vo are accused of fraud and misappropriating around $48 million in investor funds by selling more hosting agreements than the number of actual mining rigs available between 2018 and 2022.

QWhat specific aspect of VBit's operation did the SEC highlight as a defining factor in classifying its hosting agreements as securities?

AThe SEC highlighted that VBit directed hashrate into a mining pool under its control, tying investors' profits to the performance of the VBit mining pool and the recruitment of more investors.

QAccording to Mitchell Askew, why does hosted Bitcoin mining not qualify as a security under the Howey test?

AMitchell Askew argues that hosted Bitcoin mining involves clients purchasing a computer and electricity, with no pooling of capital, no profit-sharing, and no reliance on a promoter to generate returns, which clearly does not meet the criteria of an investment contract under the Howey test.

QHow has the SEC's approach to crypto enforcement changed under the Trump administration compared to the Biden administration?

AUnder the Trump administration, the SEC has been positioned to be more supportive of the industry, with several high-profile crypto investigations started under the Biden administration being dropped, though many fraud-related lawsuits continue.

Letture associate

From the "$140k Poverty Line" to the "Middle-Class Execution Line": Survival or Dignity?

The article discusses the viral narrative shift from the "140k poverty line" in the U.S. to the "middle-class斩杀线" (beheading line) in China, highlighting a growing sense of financial strain despite economic growth. It originates from Mike Green's analysis, which argues that the official U.S. poverty line ($31,200 for a family of four) is outdated. Green claims the real cost of "respectable living"—covering housing, healthcare, and childcare—is actually $140,000 annually. This creates a "斩杀线" effect: middle-income earners lose welfare benefits as their income rises, facing higher taxes and essential costs without support, making them financially vulnerable. Green attributes this to historical shifts like union monopolization, anti-trust policy changes, and capital outsourcing to China. He proposes solutions like taxing corporations more (while exempting investments) and reducing wage taxes for lower earners. Critics note data flaws in his analysis, but the "poverty sensation" resonates due to "Baumol’s Cost Disease": service sectors (e.g., healthcare, education) become expensive as wages rise without efficiency gains, while manufactured goods cheapen. The article contrasts this with China, where service costs are suppressed, avoiding a similar "beheading line." However, it hints at hidden social trade-offs, such as lower wages and dignity for service workers. Ultimately, it questions the balance between survival and dignity in modern economies.

marsbit15 min fa

From the "$140k Poverty Line" to the "Middle-Class Execution Line": Survival or Dignity?

marsbit15 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di BTC BTC sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片