SEC Chairman confirms U.S. crypto bill nears finish line: Details

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-20

Introduzione

The long-standing tension between Washington and the crypto industry is easing as SEC Chairman Paul Atkins confirms the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 is ready for presidential review. The SEC and CFTC are now cooperating to align regulations, ending years of conflict. The bill clearly divides oversight: the CFTC will regulate decentralized digital commodities like Bitcoin, while the SEC handles investment-style tokens. A "maturity clause" allows tokens to transition from SEC to CFTC oversight once their networks become sufficiently decentralized. This regulatory clarity could unlock institutional adoption and real-world asset tokenization, potentially ending crypto’s regulatory winter and fostering innovation. Despite recent market pressures, the bill represents a significant step toward legal certainty.

The long-standing tension between Washington and the crypto industry is beginning to ease.

Recently, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins confirmed that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 is ready to be presented to the U. S. President.

More importantly, he revealed that the SEC and the CFTC are no longer fighting over control and are instead working together to align their rules.

Why hasn’t the crypto market reacted?

However, this comes at a time when crypto prices are under pressure.

As per data from CoinMarketCap, the total market value has fallen to $3.08 trillion, at press time, down by 1.92% in the past 24 hours. However, this drop is mainly because of Donald Trump’s tariff shock.

This sudden shift in global economies raised fears about tighter global liquidity, pushing investors away from riskier assets like Bitcoin [BTC] and altcoins.

The fight is over

That being said, for years, crypto projects were stuck between the SEC and the CFTC, unsure which rules applied to them. However, this new bill is different as it clearly divides responsibility.

Once passed, the CFTC would oversee digital commodities, such as Bitcoin and other decentralized assets. Meanwhile, the SEC would regulate investment-style tokens, especially during early fundraising stages.

Additionally, the bill is also designed to introduce a key idea called the “maturity clause.”

Once a blockchain network becomes decentralized and stable enough, its token could move out of SEC oversight and fall under the CFTC instead.

This could stop the endless cycle of enforcement actions that have hurt crypto innovation in the U.S.

More than trading

Needless to say, this bill isn’t just about crypto exchanges. It also lays the groundwork for tokenizing real-world assets.

With clear legal rules, things like bonds, funds, and stablecoins could be issued and traded on blockchains. This makes it easier for traditional finance firms to move on-chain.

Remarking on Atkins’s remarks, an X user said,

“If market structure is finally being clarified, that’s a big unlock. Clear rules don’t slow innovation, they let real infrastructure scale.”

Echoing similar sentiments, another X user added,

“Things are about to get parabolic.”

What changed?

Under former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the crypto industry often navigated a regulatory tightrope. With President Trump back in office, however, the tone in Washington has shifted.

While Gensler’s departure has clearly opened the door to greater cooperation, the path to full regulatory clarity remains uneven.

As Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley recently noted, while progress is being made, significant clarity gaps remain.

Still, regardless of what lies ahead, this reform has been overdue for years, and it now finally appears within reach.

Ergo, one X user responded best to Atkins’s remarks when he said,

“This is huge clarity has been missing for years.”

Final Thoughts

  • Regulatory alignment between the SEC and CFTC ends years of jurisdictional uncertainty and enforcement-first policy.
  • If lawmakers bridge the remaining gaps, 2026 could mark the end of crypto’s regulatory winter and the start of institutional spring.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the name of the crypto bill that is nearing the finish line, as confirmed by the SEC Chairman?

AThe Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025.

QAccording to the article, which two regulatory bodies have stopped fighting and are now working together to align their rules?

AThe SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission).

QHow does the new bill propose to divide regulatory oversight between the SEC and CFTC?

AThe CFTC would oversee digital commodities like Bitcoin, while the SEC would regulate investment-style tokens, especially during early fundraising stages.

QWhat is the 'maturity clause' introduced in the bill?

AIt is a clause that allows a token to move out of SEC oversight and fall under the CFTC once its blockchain network becomes decentralized and stable enough.

QWhat event, unrelated to the bill, does the article cite as the main reason for the recent drop in crypto market value?

ADonald Trump's tariff shock, which raised fears about tighter global liquidity.

Letture associate

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit6 h fa

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit6 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手6 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手6 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit8 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit8 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手9 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手9 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit10 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit10 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片