Sanctioned entities moved $104B through crypto in 2025: Report

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-05

Introduzione

Sanctioned entities moved approximately $104 billion through cryptocurrency in 2025, accounting for about two-thirds of the $154 billion in total illicit crypto activity that year, according to a Chainalysis report. Sanctions-related crypto activity surged 694% year-over-year, driven by entities linked to Russia, Iran, and North Korea. Stablecoins dominated illicit flows, representing 84% of transaction volume. Despite record figures, illicit activity remains below 1% of total global cryptocurrency transactions. The report also notes increased sophistication among criminal networks using cross-chain swaps and laundering services to obscure funds.

Sanctioned entities moved roughly $104 billion through cryptocurrency in 2025, accounting for the majority of illicit on-chain activity during the year, according to a new report from Chainalysis.

The findings come from the 2026 Crypto Crime Report, which estimates that illicit crypto addresses received at least $154 billion in total during 2025. The report attributes much of the increase to a sharp rise in activity linked to sanctioned entities.

The report notes that sanctions-related crypto activity surged 694% year-over-year, highlighting the growing role of digital assets in geopolitical financial flows.

Sanctions activity drives illicit crypto surge

While illicit crypto activity has long been associated with hacks and scams, the report suggests that sanctions evasion now accounts for the largest share of illicit transaction volume.

Of the $154 billion in total illicit crypto flows recorded in 2025, about two-thirds were linked to sanctioned entities, according to the analysis.

Sanctioned entities include governments, financial institutions, and organizations restricted from accessing traditional financial systems under international sanctions regimes.

The report points to several geopolitical drivers behind the trend, including networks tied to Russia, Iran, and North Korea, which have increasingly turned to digital assets to move funds across borders.

North Korea-linked actors alone were responsible for around $2 billion in crypto theft during 2025, according to the report.

Stablecoins dominate illicit transaction flows

The report also highlights a shift in the types of digital assets used in illicit activity.

Stablecoins accounted for 84% of illicit transaction volume, reflecting their growing role in global crypto payments and transfers.

The increasing use of dollar-pegged tokens suggests that actors engaged in sanctions evasion and cross-border financial activity may prefer stable-value assets over more volatile cryptocurrencies.

Illicit activity remains a small share of crypto economy

Despite the record figures, the report notes that illicit transactions still represent less than 1% of total cryptocurrency activity globally.

Blockchain analytics firms say the transparency of public ledgers continues to aid investigations and enforcement actions against illicit actors.

However, the report warns that criminal networks are becoming more sophisticated, increasingly relying on laundering services and cross-chain infrastructure to obscure the origin of funds.

Criminal infrastructure becoming more organized

The report also points to the rise of organized crypto laundering networks that provide financial infrastructure for illicit actors.

These networks often combine services such as cross-chain swaps, over-the-counter brokers, and decentralized finance protocols to move and obfuscate funds.

Analysts say the trend reflects a broader shift toward professionalized cybercrime ecosystems, where specialized services handle different stages of illicit financial activity.


Final Summary

  • Sanctioned entities accounted for roughly $104 billion of the $154 billion in illicit crypto activity recorded in 2025, according to the report.
  • Despite record figures, illicit transactions still account for less than 1% of global cryptocurrency activity.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the Chainalysis report, how much did sanctioned entities move through cryptocurrency in 2025?

ASanctioned entities moved roughly $104 billion through cryptocurrency in 2025.

QWhat percentage of the total illicit crypto activity in 2025 was linked to sanctioned entities?

AAbout two-thirds, or roughly 67.5%, of the total $154 billion in illicit crypto flows were linked to sanctioned entities.

QWhich type of digital asset dominated illicit transaction volume, and what was its share?

AStablecoins dominated illicit transaction volume, accounting for 84% of it.

QDespite the record figures, what is the share of illicit transactions in the total global cryptocurrency activity?

AIllicit transactions still represent less than 1% of total cryptocurrency activity globally.

QWhat was the year-over-year surge in sanctions-related crypto activity?

ASanctions-related crypto activity surged 694% year-over-year.

Letture associate

20 Billion Valuation, Alibaba and Tencent Competing to Invest, Whose Money Will Liang Wenfeng Take?

DeepSeek, an AI startup founded by Liang Wenfeng, is reportedly in talks with Alibaba and Tencent for an external funding round that could value the company at over $20 billion. This marks a significant shift, as DeepSeek had previously relied solely on funding from its parent company,幻方量化 (Huanfang Quantitative), and had resisted external investment. The potential valuation would place DeepSeek among the top-tier AI model companies in China, comparable to competitors like MoonDark (valued at ~$18 billion) and ahead of recently listed firms like MiniMax and Zhipu. The funding—which could range from $600 million (for a 3% stake) to $2 billion (for 10%)—is seen as a move to secure resources for model development, retain talent, and support infrastructure needs, particularly as competition in inference models and AI agents intensifies. Both Alibaba and Tencent are eager to invest, not only for financial returns but also to integrate DeepSeek into their broader AI ecosystems. However, DeepSeek’s leadership is cautious about maintaining independence and may prefer financial investors over strategic ones to avoid being locked into a specific tech ecosystem. Alternative options, such as state-backed funds, offer longer-term capital and policy support but may come with slower decision-making and potential constraints on global expansion. With competing AI firms accelerating their IPO plans, DeepSeek’s window for securing optimal terms may be narrowing. The final decision will reflect a trade-off between capital, resources, and strategic independence.

marsbit51 min fa

20 Billion Valuation, Alibaba and Tencent Competing to Invest, Whose Money Will Liang Wenfeng Take?

marsbit51 min fa

After Losing 97% of Its Market Value, iQiyi Attempts to Use AI to Forcefully Extend Its Lifespan

After losing 97% of its market value since its 2018 peak, iQiyi is aggressively pivoting to AI in a desperate attempt to survive. At its 2026 World Conference, CEO Gong Yu announced an "AI Artist Library" with over 100 virtual performers and a new AIGC platform, "NaDou Pro," promising faster production and lower costs. This shift comes as the company faces severe financial distress: its market cap sits near delisting thresholds at $1.36 billion, with significant losses, declining membership revenue, and depleted cash flow. The AI strategy has sparked controversy. Top actors have issued legal threats against unauthorized digital replicas, while in Hengdian, over 134,000 background actors are seeing their already scarce job opportunities vanish as AI replaces them for background roles. iQiyi's move represents a fundamental shift from being a high-cost content buyer to a landlord" to becoming a "platform capitalist" that transfers production risk to creators. This contrasts with competitors like Douyin (TikTok's Chinese counterpart), which is investing heavily in *real* actor-led short dramas, betting that authentic human connection retains users better than AI-generated content. The article draws a parallel to the 1920s transition to "talkies," which made cinema musicians obsolete but ultimately enriched the art form. In contrast, iQiyi's AI drive is framed not as an artistic evolution but as a cost-cutting measure that could degrade storytelling, replacing genuine human emotion with algorithmically calculated stimulation and potentially numbing audiences' capacity for empathy. The core question remains: can a company focused solely on financial survival preserve the art of storytelling?

marsbit55 min fa

After Losing 97% of Its Market Value, iQiyi Attempts to Use AI to Forcefully Extend Its Lifespan

marsbit55 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片