Russia May Block Global Crypto Exchanges Ahead Of New Regulatory Framework – Report

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-02-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-19

Introduzione

Russia is preparing to restrict access to global cryptocurrency exchanges by summer 2026 as part of a new domestic regulatory framework, according to industry experts. The move aims to shift trading activity from foreign platforms to Russian-based services. Analysts suggest that authorities may block overseas exchanges using methods similar to previous restrictions on platforms like Telegram and YouTube. However, experts warn that such measures could drive part of the market underground, increasing fraud and complicating regulation. Meanwhile, the European Union is considering broader sanctions on all Russia-related crypto transactions to prevent sanctions evasion, including a potential ban on digital ruble transactions.

Russia is preparing to restrict access to global crypto exchanges this summer, experts said, suggesting that authorities are planning to shift trading from foreign platforms to domestic ones under the upcoming regulatory framework.

Russia To Restrict Foreign Crypto Exchanges

On Tuesday, experts said Russia will likely block foreign crypto exchanges by summer 2026 as lawmakers advance the highly anticipated domestic framework, expected by July 1, to bring the industry out of the shadows.

According to a report by local news outlet RBC Crypto, industry participants believe authorities will soon begin restricting access to overseas exchanges, similar to the Telegram and YouTube block.

Nikita Zuborev, senior analyst at crypto exchange aggregator Bestchange.ru, told the news media outlet that this scenario is likely, asserting that as soon as the domestic market enters the new regulatory regime, “there is an almost 100% chance that the fight against major competitors will begin.”

“We expect that Roskomnadzor may begin mass blocking of websites of crypto exchanges and large exchangers not registered in Russia as early as this summer. Most likely, they will act according to the YouTube blocking model — they will delete DNS records in the Russian segment of the Internet and continue to fight against means of circumventing the blocks,” the analyst stated.

However, Zuborev cautioned that if global exchanges are not allowed to obtain licenses or to operate as agents of domestic exchanges or brokers, a part of the market will move underground, increasing fraud, complicating regulation, and resulting in higher commission fees.

Meanwhile, Dmitry Machikhin, lawyer and founder of BitOK, considers a “Belarusian scenario” highly possible. Notably, only companies operating under Belarus’ special regime can conduct cryptocurrency transactions, while individuals are prohibited from buying and selling digital assets on foreign platforms.

Machikhin noted that completely restricting operations is impossible, citing Binance as an example. The global exchange still has over 1 million Russian customers despite its departure from the country’s market. Therefore, the chances of a direct ban on transactions using foreign exchanges are low, the lawmakers added.

EU Explores Broader Sanctions

Ignat Likhunov, founder of Cartesius law agency, agreed with the other two experts, affirming, “It seems that blocking measures are being prepared in parallel with the creation of a ‘white’ zone, and conditions for ‘illegal’ exchangers and unfriendly foreign exchanges will deteriorate.”

He pointed out that the lack of “real levers of influence” over foreign exchanges, noting that the platforms don’t need to hurry to comply with any requirements of Russian legislation.

As a result, authorities will likely hold them accountable in absentia and block access to the foreign exchanges that enforce sanctions against Russia for various reasons, including economic or non-compliance with the law on data landing.

It’s worth noting that the European Union has been exploring implementing strict sanctions on all crypto transactions linked to Russia to limit sanctions evasion. As reported by Bitcoinist, the European Commission is strengthening its crackdown on the country’s use of digital assets to evade sanctions by considering measures to ban all Russia-related crypto transactions.

Legal documents show that the Commission has proposed a broader prohibition “instead of attempting to ban copycat Russian crypto entities spun out of already sanctioned platforms.” The proposal focuses on stopping the growth of successors to Russia-linked crypto exchange Garantex, while aiming at payment platforms such as A7 and its related ruble-pegged stablecoin A7A5.

The Commission also suggested adding 20 banks to the list of sanctioned entities and a ban on any digital ruble-related transactions.

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $67,588 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is Russia planning to do with global crypto exchanges according to the report?

ARussia is preparing to restrict access to global crypto exchanges, likely by blocking their websites, to shift trading activity to domestic platforms under a new regulatory framework expected by summer 2026.

QWhich Russian agency is expected to carry out the mass blocking of foreign crypto exchange websites?

ARoskomnadzor, Russia's federal executive body responsible for monitoring and controlling media and communications, is expected to begin mass blocking of these websites.

QWhat potential negative consequence did Nikita Zuborev warn about if global exchanges are not allowed to operate in Russia?

ANikita Zuborev warned that if global exchanges are not allowed to obtain licenses or operate as agents, a part of the market will move underground, leading to increased fraud, more difficult regulation, and higher commission fees.

QWhat alternative scenario, similar to another country's model, was suggested as a possibility for Russia's crypto regulation?

ADmitry Machikhin suggested a 'Belarusian scenario' is highly possible, where only companies operating under a special regime can conduct crypto transactions, while individuals are prohibited from using foreign platforms.

QWhat broader action is the European Union exploring regarding crypto transactions and Russia?

AThe European Union is exploring implementing strict sanctions to ban all crypto transactions linked to Russia to limit sanctions evasion, including a broader prohibition and a ban on any digital ruble-related transactions.

Letture associate

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit3 min fa

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit3 min fa

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit2 h fa

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit2 h fa

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit2 h fa

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit2 h fa

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit2 h fa

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片