Robinhood CEO: Five Years After the GameStop Incident, We Are Committing to Unlocking Real-Time Settlement for Retail Traders Through Tokenization

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-29

Introduzione

Five years after the GameStop trading halt, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev reflects on the event and outlines the company's push for real-time settlement through tokenization. The 2021 trading restrictions were caused by legacy clearinghouse risk rules tied to the slow T+2 settlement cycle, which required massive capital reserves during periods of high volatility. While advocating for and achieving T+1 settlement in the initial response, Tenev argues it remains insufficient in today's 24/7 markets. The solution is tokenization—converting stocks into blockchain-based tokens. This enables real-time settlement, drastically reducing systemic risk, lowering costs, and allowing for features like 24/7 trading, fractional ownership, and DeFi integration. Robinhood has already launched over 2,000 tokenized US stocks in Europe, with plans to enable round-the-clock trading and self-custody. Tenev emphasizes that US adoption requires a clear regulatory framework, noting recent SEC openness to innovation and the importance of the CLARITY Act in establishing modern rules for stock tokenization. The goal is to prevent future trading restrictions and fully unlock real-time settlement for retail investors.

Author: Vlad Tenev, Co-founder and CEO of Robinhood

Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher

What exactly happened? And how can we ensure such an event never happens again?

Five years ago today, Robinhood and other brokerages were forced to halt purchases of several "meme stocks," most notably GameStop. It was one of the most bizarre and dramatic stock market crashes in recent memory.

The root cause of this trading halt lay in a complex set of clearinghouse risk management rules designed to mitigate the risks stemming from the then two-day settlement cycle for U.S. stock trades. These rules required brokerages to deposit massive amounts of capital to cover the risk between the trade and settlement of these highly volatile "meme stocks." What happens when slow, antiquated financial infrastructure collides with unprecedented trading volume and volatility in a handful of stocks? Massive deposit requirements, trading restrictions, and millions of angry customers.

Retail investors trying to buy GameStop stock were understandably furious. In their eyes, Robinhood went from hero to villain. I was just one month into my role as CEO of Robinhood, facing my first major crisis. After many team members worked around the clock for 72 hours to address the immediate fire and raise over $3 billion to shore up our capital reserves, we finally had a moment to step back and assess the situation. I vowed to do everything in my power not only to improve Robinhood's resilience in a similar scenario but also to advocate for systemic improvements to ensure such an event never happens again.

We strongly advocated for real-time settlement of U.S. stock trades, ultimately helping to shorten the settlement cycle from 2 days (T+2) to T+1—arguably the most significant achievement during Gensler's tenure as Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), despite the otherwise regrettable aspects of that period.

But in an era of 24-hour news cycles and real-time market reactions, a T+1 settlement cycle is still too long, especially when it effectively becomes T+3 on Fridays and T+4 over long weekends. Our pursuit of real-time settlement continues, but within the traditional stock market, achieving it has been elusive due to the need to manage numerous legacy stakeholders. Clearly, a new approach was needed.

Enter tokenization. Tokenization is the process of converting an asset, like a stock, into a token that exists on a blockchain. Among its many advantages—such as lower costs, native fractionalization, and 24/7 trading—putting stocks on-chain as tokens allows them to benefit from the real-time settlement properties of blockchain technology. The elimination of long settlement cycles means significantly reduced systemic risk and less strain on clearinghouses and brokers, allowing customers to trade freely, anytime, anywhere.

We've already seen this approach work. In Europe, Robinhood has launched tokens representing over 2,000 U.S.-listed stocks. These tokens allow European traders to invest in U.S. equities and receive dividend payments. In the coming months, we plan to enable 24/7 trading and decentralized finance (DeFi) services, where investors can self-custody their stock tokens and engage in activities like lending and staking.

As the advantages become increasingly clear, I believe it's imperative for the U.S. to embrace this technology. We are already seeing some progress: major U.S. exchanges and clearinghouses recently announced plans for stock tokenization.

But without a clear regulatory framework, these efforts will be in vain. Fortunately, we now have a prime opportunity. The current leadership at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is actively embracing innovation and encouraging experimentation with tokenization. Furthermore, Congress is actively considering the CLARITY Act, significant crypto legislation that would require the SEC to continue advancing this technology and establish modern rules for stock tokenization. This act would ensure that subsequent SEC leadership cannot abandon or reverse the progress made by the current commission.

By working with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and advocating for sound U.S. stock tokenization guidelines through CLARITY, we can collectively ensure that trading restrictions like those in 2021 never happen again. Let's seize the moment and finally unlock real-time settlement for retail traders.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the root cause that forced Robinhood and other brokers to halt purchases of meme stocks like GameStop five years ago?

AThe root cause was a complex set of clearinghouse risk management rules designed to mitigate the risk from the two-day settlement cycle (T+2) for US stock trading at the time. These rules required brokers to deposit huge amounts of capital to cover the risk between the trade and settlement of the highly volatile meme stocks.

QWhat specific improvement did Robinhood advocate for and help achieve in the US stock settlement system after the incident?

ARobinhood advocated for real-time settlement and helped achieve a reduction of the US stock settlement cycle from two days (T+2) to one day (T+1).

QAccording to the article, what is tokenization and what is its key advantage for stock trading mentioned in relation to settlement?

ATokenization is the process of converting assets, like stocks, into tokens that exist on a blockchain. Its key advantage for settlement is that it enables real-time settlement, which eliminates the long settlement cycle, drastically reduces systemic risk, and relieves pressure on clearinghouses and brokers.

QWhat has Robinhood already launched in Europe that demonstrates the feasibility of tokenizing US-listed stocks?

AIn Europe, Robinhood has launched over 2,000 tokens representing US-listed stocks, which enable European traders to invest in US stocks and receive dividend payments.

QWhat US legislative act does the article mention as being crucial for establishing a regulatory framework for stock tokenization?

AThe article mentions the CLARITY Act, a significant piece of crypto legislation being actively considered by Congress, which would require the SEC to advance this technology and create modern rules for stock tokenization.

Letture associate

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit49 min fa

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit49 min fa

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit2 h fa

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片