Ripple Exec Warns Compromise Is Coming – What This Means For XRP

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-02-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-12

Introduzione

Ripple's Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, indicated that a compromise may be near in ongoing discussions between banks, the U.S. Senate, and crypto leaders regarding stablecoin regulations. A recent White House meeting, though not final, was described as productive. Banks presented principles opposing yield-bearing stablecoins to protect traditional banking, but reportedly made a key compromise by allowing possible exemptions. This could permit transaction-based rewards under strict conditions, impacting Ripple’s operations and its stablecoin RLUSD. The outcome, expected by March 2026, may define permissible crypto activities and significantly influence XRP’s regulatory environment and market role.

Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer (CLO), Stuart Alderoty, has signaled that a compromise may emerge soon from ongoing discussions among banks, the US Senate, and crypto leaders over stablecoin rewards. The comments followed a smaller White House meeting focused on stablecoin regulations, which highlighted which activities should be allowed under upcoming rules. Depending on the outcome, this could directly affect Ripple’s operations and the broader outlook for XRP.

Compromise Puts Ripple In Regulatory Focus

Popular Journalist Eleanor Terrett reported on Wednesday, February 11, that both banking and crypto participants had described the Stablecoin yield meeting in the White House as productive, even though no final agreement was reached. The meeting explored deal specifics in more detail than previous sessions, with particular attention on how stablecoin rewards, highlighted in the Clarity Act, could be structured under future rules.

During the meeting, Alderoty stated that “compromise is in the air,” signaling potential movement toward shared ground between banks and crypto representatives. For XRP, this matters because Ripple’s role in cross-border payments and the services of its stablecoin RLUSD depend heavily on how regulators define permissible reward-based and transaction-based activities.

Notably, Terrett stated that banks and trade groups arrived at the White House meeting with a written set of prohibition principles that outlined what they would not accept regarding stablecoin rewards. These principles were designed to protect traditional banking structures while limiting the extent to which digital assets could compete with deposit products.

Under the principles, banks stated that payment stablecoins should not offer yield or rewards to prevent deposit flight and preserve lending in local communities. They also called for strong enforcement measures to close loopholes, restrictions on marketing that could present stablecoins as insured or risk-free, and a regulatory review after two years to assess potential risks.

According to Terrett, one source said banks made a key concession by accepting language that included possible exemptions, something that had previously been off the table. This change opens the possibility that transaction-based rewards could be permitted under tightly defined conditions, a development that may influence how Ripple structures its stablecoin services, with potential effects on XRP as well.

What Negotiations Could Mean For XRP And Stablecoins

A major point of debate during the meeting was the definition of permissible activities, which would determine what crypto firms like Ripple are allowed to do when offering stablecoin rewards. Crypto representatives pushed for broader definitions to provide more clarity for stablecoins, while banks argued for narrower boundaries to reduce risks to the financial system.

The White House urged both parties to reach an agreement by March 1, 2026, with further discussions expected in the coming days. Although it’s unclear whether another meeting of the same scale will take place this month, Ripple’s participation puts RLUSD and XRP directly in the spotlight. The outcome of these negotiations could shape how the crypto company and the broader stablecoin market offer rewards and likely influence how they operate under future regulatory frameworks.

XRP trading at $1.37 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat did Ripple's Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, signal about the ongoing stablecoin discussions?

AStuart Alderoty signaled that 'compromise is in the air,' indicating potential movement toward shared ground between banks and crypto representatives regarding stablecoin regulations.

QWhat was the key concession made by banks during the White House meeting on stablecoins?

ABanks made a key concession by accepting language that included possible exemptions for stablecoin rewards, which had previously been off the table, opening the possibility for transaction-based rewards under tightly defined conditions.

QHow could the outcome of these negotiations affect Ripple and its stablecoin RLUSD?

AThe outcome could directly influence how Ripple structures its stablecoin services, particularly regarding permissible activities for offering rewards, which may also have potential effects on XRP.

QWhat was the major point of debate between crypto representatives and banks during the meeting?

AThe major point of debate was the definition of permissible activities, with crypto representatives pushing for broader definitions to provide clarity for stablecoins, while banks argued for narrower boundaries to reduce risks to the financial system.

QBy when did the White House urge both parties to reach an agreement on stablecoin regulations?

AThe White House urged both parties to reach an agreement by March 1, 2026, with further discussions expected in the coming days.

Letture associate

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit6 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit6 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手29 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手29 min fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1 h fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1 h fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2 h fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Cosa è XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: Una Nuova Frontiera nel Paesaggio delle Criptovalute Introduzione a XRP 2.0 Nel mondo in continua evoluzione delle criptovalute, nuovi progetti emergono continuamente, cercando attenzione e adozione. Una tale iniziativa promettente è XRP 2.0, un nuovo progetto di criptovaluta progettato per sfruttare avanzate tecnologie blockchain e metodologie di crittografia robuste. Anche se il nome richiama alla mente l'XRP di Ripple, è fondamentale notare che XRP 2.0 opera in modo indipendente, concentrandosi sul miglioramento della sicurezza delle transazioni, della privacy e della scalabilità. Mentre il panorama finanziario digitale abbraccia sempre di più soluzioni decentralizzate, XRP 2.0 mira a contribuire in modo significativo al web3 e all'espansione generale dei progetti crypto. Cos'è XRP 2.0? Alla sua base, XRP 2.0 è un progetto di criptovaluta che mira a creare un ecosistema di valuta digitale sicuro e decentralizzato. La sua tecnologia fondamentale integra principi di blockchain sofisticati con tecniche di crittografia all'avanguardia. L'obiettivo principale di XRP 2.0 è quello di affermarsi come una piattaforma affidabile ed efficiente in grado di consentire un'esecuzione rapida delle transazioni, dando priorità a migliori protezioni della privacy per i suoi utenti. Il progetto è promosso come una soluzione a molte limitazioni affrontate dalle criptovalute esistenti, proponendo un sistema in grado di gestire un volume maggiore di transazioni con migliorata velocità e privacy. Questa versatilità pone XRP 2.0 come un significativo competitor in un mercato affollato di varie valute digitali. Chi è il Creatore di XRP 2.0? L'identità del creatore dietro XRP 2.0 è stata segnalata come 'Wilbur'. Tuttavia, i dettagli completi riguardanti Wilbur o l'entità associata rimangono sfuggenti. L'anonimato di molti creatori di criptovalute non è un fenomeno raro nel settore, spesso progettato per mantenere un certo grado di privacy e sicurezza. Chi sono gli Investitori di XRP 2.0? Al momento, informazioni specifiche relative alle fondazioni o organizzazioni di investimento a supporto di XRP 2.0 non sono disponibili pubblicamente. Nel settore delle criptovalute, il supporto di investitori rinomati può influenzare significativamente la credibilità e il successo di un progetto, tuttavia la trasparenza riguardo ai sostenitori finanziari di XRP 2.0 non è stata stabilita. Come Funziona XRP 2.0? XRP 2.0 si distingue per l'impiego di una combinazione di tecnologia blockchain e algoritmi di crittografia avanzati che garantiscono transazioni sicure e decentralizzate. La sua struttura innovativa include caratteristiche uniche progettate per promuovere il coinvolgimento degli utenti e ampliare le funzionalità oltre le transazioni convenzionali delle criptovalute. Tra queste caratteristiche, XRP 2.0 incorpora capacità alimentate da intelligenza artificiale, come funzionalità di testo in immagini e testo in voce. Queste aggiunte sono progettate per migliorare l'esperienza interattiva per gli utenti, promuovendo una maggiore applicabilità in vari settori. Unendo progressi tecnologici con design incentrati sugli utenti, XRP 2.0 mira a catturare l'attenzione di una vasta gamma di individui e aziende che cercano di integrare soluzioni di criptovaluta nei loro framework operativi. Cronologia di XRP 2.0 Comprendere XRP 2.0 richiede di esaminare i traguardi che hanno definito il suo percorso fino ad ora: 23 luglio 2023: XRP 2.0 viene introdotto come un nuovo progetto di criptovaluta, mirante a rivoluzionare le capacità di transazione sicura e decentralizzata nel dominio blockchain. 8 settembre 2023: Si verifica il lancio di un altro progetto, XRP20, marcando l'emergere di un token ERC-20 sulla blockchain di Ethereum che resta non correlato a XRP 2.0. 13 novembre 2023: Il ledger XRP subisce un significativo aggiornamento con il rilascio della versione 2.0.0 del software server rippled. È essenziale notare che questo sviluppo è scollegato dal progetto di criptovaluta XRP 2.0. Punti Chiave su XRP 2.0 Per distillare l'essenza di XRP 2.0, emergono diversi fattori critici: Caratteristiche Uniche: L'inclusione di funzionalità come il testo in immagini e testo in voce alimentato da intelligenza artificiale diversifica ulteriormente le potenziali applicazioni di XRP 2.0. Tecnologia Blockchain: Il framework utilizza meccanismi blockchain avanzati e protocolli di crittografia, garantendo un ambiente sicuro e decentralizzato per le transazioni. Scalabilità e Privacy: XRP 2.0 dà priorità a migliori protezioni della privacy nei processi di transazione e alla scalabilità necessaria per accogliere una base di utenti in crescita. Nessuna Affiliazione con Ripple: È importante notare che, nonostante il suo nome, XRP 2.0 non ha alcuna fedeltà o collaborazione con l'XRP di Ripple, distinguendo il proprio framework operativo e obiettivi all'interno dell'ecosistema delle criptovalute. Conclusione XRP 2.0 rappresenta un'ambiziosa venture nell'ambito delle criptovalute, mirante a offrire una combinazione di sicurezza, privacy ed efficienza nelle transazioni digitali. Integrando tecnologie sofisticate e caratteristiche user-friendly, il progetto si propone di ampliare gli orizzonti di ciò che le criptovalute possono realizzare nell'economia digitale odierna. Sebbene l'anonimato del suo creatore e la mancanza di investitori dichiarati possano sollevare domande per alcuni, il focus di XRP 2.0 su funzionalità avanzate e decentralizzazione ne amplifica l'appeal in un mercato crypto sempre più affollato. Man mano che il panorama delle criptovalute continua a evolversi, XRP 2.0 potrebbe emergere come un attore decisivo nell'espansione di soluzioni blockchain sicure e scalabili.

166 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.04.05Aggiornato il 2024.12.03

Cosa è XRP 2.0

Come comprare XRP

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di XRP (XRP) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente XRPXRP.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva XRP (XRP)Dopo aver acquistato XRP (XRP), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia XRP (XRP)Scambia facilmente XRP (XRP) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

1.5k Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare XRP

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di XRP XRP sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片