Ripple Chiseled a Crack in the Wall, But Swift Tore Down the Entire Wall

深潮Pubblicato 2025-12-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-23

Introduzione

At the Sibos 2025 conference, Swift announced a major evolution of its financial infrastructure by integrating a blockchain-based shared ledger to support tokenized assets and enable secure, real-time, and interoperable global transactions. The new system, built on Consensys' Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea, uses zk-EVM rollup technology to reduce costs and settlement times while meeting banking security standards. Over 30 major banks, including JPMorgan and Citibank, are participating in the pilot. The article reflects on Ripple’s long-standing effort to challenge traditional cross-border payments using XRP and RippleNet, which has seen adoption in retail and corporate remittances despite earlier regulatory challenges. However, Swift’s move represents a broader and more systemic shift. Unlike Ripple’s XRP-dependent model, Swift’s ledger is asset-agnostic, supporting CBDCs, stablecoins, and fiat currencies, and leverages its existing network of over 11,000 institutions. This transition marks a convergence of traditional and decentralized finance, enabling 24/7 settlement, reducing reliance on pre-funded accounts, and potentially freeing up trillions in trapped capital. By adopting a neutral, interoperable, and highly scalable blockchain framework, Swift is positioned to redefine global value transfer—moving from a legacy telegraphic model to a digitally-native, mathematically-verified system.

Author: Sanqing, Foresight News

During the Sibos 2025 conference in Frankfurt, Swift's Chief Business Officer Thierry Chilosi and Standard Chartered Bank's Global Head of Transaction Banking, Michael Spiegel, discussed a major transformation in global finance. As tokenization moves from pilot programs to reality, Swift officially announced the addition of a blockchain-based shared ledger to its infrastructure, aiming to achieve trusted and interoperable digital finance on a global scale. This ledger will serve as a secure, real-time transaction record between financial institutions, using smart contracts to validate transaction sequences and execute agreed-upon rules. It is designed to complement existing systems and seamlessly bridge traditional finance with tokenized assets.

Image Source: Swift Official Website

Although Swift did not explicitly state the technical platform when initially announcing this major development to the banking industry, Consensys CEO Joe Lubin revealed at the Token2049 conference in Singapore that Swift is leveraging the Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea to build its new payment settlement platform. By adopting Linea's zk-EVM rollup technology, Swift can significantly reduce costs and latency while meeting the financial industry's stringent requirements for 24/7 real-time settlement and security. Currently, over 30 top financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citibank, are preparing to participate in the pilot of this new blockchain-based payment rail built on Linea.

Ripple's In-Depth Efforts and Current Status

Before discussing Swift, we must revisit the pioneer that challenged the old system for over a decade: Ripple.

In 2012, Ripple emerged with the XRP Ledger (XRPL), with the core goal of replacing the inefficient Swift correspondent banking model. During this period, Ripple successfully built the global payment network RippleNet, connecting over 300 financial institutions. In fragmented markets like Southeast Asia, its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service demonstrated that XRP, as a bridge currency, could reduce cross-border settlement times from several days to just 3 to 5 seconds.

By 2020, affected by the U.S. SEC lawsuit, Ripple faced a blockade and stagnation in the U.S. market due to securities allegations. However, its global scale continued to expand. By 2022, its business had reached over 40 payment markets, with total payment volume doubling to approximately $30 billion.

In 2023, Ripple saw a turning point when a court ruled that XRP itself is not a security, marking a milestone victory for Ripple and the industry.

In August 2025, with the SEC completely abandoning its appeal, the five-year legal battle came to an end. The full clarification of its status led to the approval of an XRP spot ETF, marking its official entry into mainstream institutional asset allocation portfolios.

Today, Ripple is conducting cross-border payment and receipt businesses in multiple real-world scenarios, ranging from retail remittances (To C) to enterprise-level payments (To B).

In the retail sector, Japan's SBI Remit uses XRP to bridge real-time remittance channels to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia, significantly reducing the pre-funding costs for overseas workers. Santander Bank offers transparent real-time transfers to its customers through the One Pay FX app. Meanwhile, the Southeast Asian payment platform Tranglo has significantly improved the efficiency of peso and baht conversions with the support of Ripple ODL.

At the enterprise level, American Express and PNC Bank use RippleNet to optimize B2B trade settlements and international payment collection experiences.

Additionally, in national infrastructure, Ripple is collaborating with over 20 countries, including Palau, Montenegro, and Bhutan, to develop CBDC platforms, applying blockchain technology to the issuance and清算 systems of sovereign currencies.

Why Did Swift Choose Linea?

When giants in the industry布局 the Ethereum ecosystem, they have shown a high degree of consistency in their preference for Layer 2 technology: Coinbase's Base chain is built on OP Stack, while Robinhood announced earlier this year the launch of Robinhood Chain based on Arbitrum technology to support the tokenization and 24/7 trading of RWA.

This preference stems from L2's ability to leverage Ethereum's security while meeting high-performance demands through a modular architecture. Swift's choice of Linea over OP or Arbitrum lies in the core difference in underlying validation logic.

OP and Arbitrum use Optimistic Rollup, which operates on the logic of assuming transactions are valid by default and only verifying them if challenged. Asset withdrawals typically require a multi-day challenge period, which is a significant time cost for financial清算追求流动性.

Linea, on the other hand, uses zk-EVM, which provides instant validity proofs mathematically. For Swift and its partner banks, which need to process massive value settlements, zk-EVM not only offers faster finality but also ensures compliance verification while protecting transaction privacy.

Swift's choice of Linea embodies the first principle of capital operation: maximizing flow velocity.

Capital will flow like a fluid from low-velocity systems (requiring large amounts of idle准备金预存 in Nostro/Vostro accounts), high-friction systems (layers of correspondent bank fees), and slow-settlement systems (settlement taking days) of the traditional telegraphic instruction era to high-velocity, low-friction, fast-settlement blockchain digital systems.

Swift processes approximately $150 trillion in global payments annually. If it can achieve atomic-level reconciliation and 24/7 real-time settlement through Linea's technology stack, it means that trillions of dollars in准备金 currently积压 in the global financial system to hedge against清算 delays will be released and reinjected into the real economy.

As Consensys CEO Joe Lubin stated at the Token 2049 conference in Singapore, this is not merely a technological upgrade but the true convergence of TradFi and DeFi, marking the global value transfer protocol's official transition from the "Telegraphic Instruction Era" to the "Mathematical Verification Era."

The Significance of Swift Embracing Blockchain

As the global financial backbone network handling approximately $150 trillion in annual transaction volume, Swift's decision to build its ledger on Linea, an Ethereum Layer 2, signifies that blockchain technology will become the heart of mainstream finance.

Swift will eliminate fragmentation between different tokenized networks through unified technical standards, breaking down the long-standing barrier between TradFi and DeFi and implanting the efficiency genes of decentralized finance into the traditional清算 system.

Through a 24/7 operational real-time shared ledger, global financial institutions will no longer be limited by the cumbersome manual reconciliation and time-zone delays of the correspondent banking model. The massive amounts of idle capital currently积压 in correspondent bank accounts to hedge against清算 risk will be effectively released. This will enable the speed of capital flow to truly match the demands of the modern economy, ushering in a new era of global value transfer that is more transparent, lower cost, and更具互操作性.

Ripple struggled for a decade to build a new city based on the XRP Ledger outside the old system. However, the scale of financial institutions it currently connects appears势单力薄 compared to Swift's存量 network, which covers over 11,000 institutions across more than 200 countries.

The core threat from Swift lies in its "asset neutrality." Unlike Ripple's ODL model, which heavily relies on XRP as a bridge currency, Swift's blockchain ledger is designed to support multiple assets, including fiat currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs.

Banks within the Swift system can achieve instant settlement by upgrading their existing rails without bearing the volatility risk of a single asset. This combination of "存量优势 (incumbent advantage) + technical compliance" is giving Ripple its most bone-chilling challenge since its inception.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the core technological difference between Swift's chosen Linea and other Layer 2 solutions like Optimistic Rollups?

AThe core difference lies in the underlying verification logic. Linea uses zk-EVM (Zero-Knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine), which provides instant validity proofs for transactions. In contrast, Optimistic Rollups (like OP and Arbitrum) assume transactions are valid by default and only verify them if a challenge is issued, which introduces a multi-day withdrawal delay. For high-value financial settlements requiring speed and finality, zk-EVM's instant cryptographic verification is superior.

QHow did the resolution of Ripple's legal battle with the SEC in 2025 impact its business?

AThe resolution, with the SEC dropping its appeals in August 2025, provided full legal clarity for Ripple. This landmark victory led to the approval of an XRP spot ETF, marking its formal entry into the asset allocation lists of mainstream financial firms and solidifying its legitimacy in the market.

QWhat specific problem is Swift's new blockchain-based shared ledger designed to solve in global finance?

AIt is designed to solve the inefficiencies of the traditional correspondent banking model, including slow settlement times (taking days), high costs from intermediary fees, and the need for large amounts of pre-funded capital (Nostro/Vostro accounts) to hedge against settlement risk. The ledger enables secure, real-time, 24/7 settlement, releasing trapped capital and improving interoperability.

QWhy is Swift's approach considered a greater threat to Ripple than simply competing with its technology?

ASwift's threat stems from its 'asset neutrality' and immense existing network. Unlike Ripple's ODL model, which relies heavily on the XRP token as a bridge currency, Swift's ledger is designed to support multiple assets including fiat currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs. This allows Swift's vast network of over 11,000 banks to upgrade for instant settlement without exposure to the volatility of a single asset, leveraging its massive existing infrastructure.

QName one retail and one corporate use case where Ripple's technology is currently being implemented.

ARetail: Japan's SBI Remit uses XRP to provide real-time remittance channels to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia. Corporate: American Express utilizes RippleNet to optimize its B2B trade settlement processes.

Letture associate

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit24 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit24 min fa

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit1 h fa

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit1 h fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1 h fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare O

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di O1 exchange (O) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente O1 exchangeO.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva O1 exchange (O)Dopo aver acquistato O1 exchange (O), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia O1 exchange (O)Scambia facilmente O1 exchange (O) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

151 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.19Aggiornato il 2026.06.29

Come comprare O

Come comprare PROS

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Pharos (PROS) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente PharosPROS.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Pharos (PROS)Dopo aver acquistato Pharos (PROS), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Pharos (PROS)Scambia facilmente Pharos (PROS) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

145 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.22Aggiornato il 2026.06.29

Come comprare PROS

Cosa è VERONA

I. Introduzione al Progetto VERONA è una blockchain costruita per tutti, ovunque attraverso l'astrazione della catena. Utilizzando il suo livello di astrazione generalizzato, VERONA si distingue integrando funzionalità blockchain complesse, come conti, firme e interoperabilità, direttamente a livello di protocollo. Questo approccio consente di interagire con le applicazioni blockchain senza la necessità di comprendere le tecnologie sottostanti.1) Informazioni di Base Nome:VERONA(VERONA)III. Link Correlati Link al sito ufficiale:https://xion.burnt.com/ Whitepaper:https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Esploratori:https://explorer.burnt.com/ Social Media: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: L'introduzione al progetto proviene dai materiali pubblicati o forniti dal team ufficiale del progetto, che è solo a scopo di riferimento e non costituisce consulenza per investimenti. HTX non si assume responsabilità per eventuali perdite dirette o indirette risultanti.

163 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.22Aggiornato il 2026.06.22

Cosa è VERONA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di A A sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片