Richard Sutton, the 69-Year-Old Father of Reinforcement Learning, Launches Startup: Building a 20-Watt Human-Brain-Level Agent

marsbitPubblicato 2026-07-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-14

Introduzione

Reinforcement Learning pioneer Richard Sutton, 69, has co-founded Oak Lab after departing Keen Technologies. The new venture aims to build a trillion-parameter intelligent agent capable of real-time learning and planning with a power consumption of only 20 watts, matching the human brain. Sutton, a foundational figure in reinforcement learning and co-author of its seminal textbook, believes current deep learning approaches are inefficient and require a fundamental paradigm shift. Oak Lab's core thesis is that intelligence stems from runtime experience. The proposed OaK (Options and Knowledge) architecture seeks to enable agents to learn continuously from their own interactions, abstracting sequences of actions into reusable skills without storing or replaying past data batches. This direction builds upon Sutton's long-held views, including those expressed in "The Bitter Lesson," and marks a move towards what he calls the "age of experience"—where AI learns from self-generated experience rather than static, human-curated datasets. Sutton's first public appearance following the launch will be at the Shanghai WAIC conference.

69 is the prime age to "create"!

Richard Sutton, the foundational figure of reinforcement learning and recipient of the 2024 Turing Award, announced that he and his student Khurram Javed have left Keen Technologies, founded by John Carmack, to start their own venture named Oak Lab.

Richard Sutton can be considered the pioneer of modern reinforcement learning:

He pursued his undergraduate studies in psychology at Stanford and earned his Ph.D. under the guidance of reinforcement learning pioneer Andrew Barto. Early in his career, he conducted research at GTE Labs and AT&T Labs.

He proposed the Temporal Difference algorithm, and co-authored with his advisor Andrew Barto the book "Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction," which serves as the universal textbook in the field.

From 2003 onwards, Sutton served as a full professor at the University of Alberta for a long time, establishing the university's Reinforcement Learning and Artificial Intelligence (RLAI) laboratory.

From 2017 to 2023, he worked as a Distinguished Research Scientist at DeepMind, leading the establishment of the DeepMind Edmonton research team.

Over more than forty years, Sutton has also nurtured a large number of top talents in the AI industry.

These include David Silver, the core designer of AlphaGo; Doina Precup, Head of DeepMind Montreal; Michael Bowling, an expert in game AI; and his current co-founder Khurram Javed.

Judging from his tweets, Sutton's reason for this independent venture is straightforward:

He believes current deep learning methods are weak and inefficient, requiring not minor fixes but entirely new foundational ideas and a complete overhaul.

In other words, Sutton thinks the existing AI path has difficulty advancing further toward higher levels of general intelligence.

The ultimate goal of Oak Lab is:

To build an agent with a trillion parameters, capable of real-time learning and real-time planning, with a total system power consumption of only 20 watts.

20 watts is precisely the energy consumption level of the human brain.

While the entire AI industry is still stacking GPUs and expanding data centers, the founding father of reinforcement learning is preparing to redefine what intelligence is.

Parting Ways with the "Carmack God"

To understand why Sutton is leaving, we must first clarify where he is leaving from.

The founder of Keen Technologies, John Carmack, is the creator of "Doom" and "Quake," the former CTO of Oculus, a legendary figure in the programming world known as "Carmack God."

After leaving Meta in 2022, he fully dedicated himself to an AI startup, also focused on reinforcement learning.

In September 2023, Sutton chose to join Keen, prompted by Google DeepMind's closure of his Edmonton laboratory in Canada.

At the time, their collaboration was seen as a dream team:

One was a legendary figure in low-level systems engineering, the other a foundational theorist in reinforcement learning, aiming to build a prototype system showing "signs of AGI life" by 2030.

Now, less than three years into the collaboration, Sutton has chosen to step away.

However, he specifically dedicated the first line of his tweet to Carmack:

I can't say enough good things about John Carmack and Keen Technologies.

The implication is clear: the departure isn't because Carmack wasn't good enough, but because they diverged on how to reach the end goal.

In Sutton's view, the current developmental trajectory of deep learning is untenable.

Models don't need endless iterative fine-tuning; the entire industry urgently requires a paradigm-level disruption and reconstruction.

What Does Oak Lab Aim to Do?

The core bet of Sutton's startup can be summarized in one sentence:

Intelligence arises from continuously generated experience at runtime.

The working mode of current mainstream large models essentially involves months of offline pre-training with enormous costs, relying on massive amounts of textual data.

After training concludes, the model's parameters are mostly fixed before deployment.

Even though it converses with billions of users daily, the vast majority of these interactions cannot transform into new capabilities for itself.

The model can only reuse knowledge acquired during the training phase or temporarily remember information within the conversation context. It cannot update itself through continuous perception of the outside world, like humans and animals do.

But the agent Oak Lab wants to build is different.

It will perceive its surroundings, take corresponding actions, and adjust its behavior based on the outcomes.

Whenever it has a new experience, the learning process happens synchronously, without waiting for long intervals to conduct a new centralized training round.

As Sutton himself says:

Every moment an AI runs should be a moment of learning.

Currently, Oak Lab has announced its core research roadmap, centered around an architecture named OaK.

OaK stands for Options and Knowledge.

The purpose of this architecture is to enable an agent to discover temporally extended abstract structures from its own experience and transform them into verifiable, plannable, and reusable skills.

For example, when a robot goes to the kitchen to get water for the first time, the entire process involves identifying the room, avoiding obstacles, picking up a cup, turning on the faucet, and a series of other actions.

Traditional AI would treat all these steps as a single decision-making task.

The OaK architecture, however, would allow the agent to deconstruct higher-level skills like "go to kitchen," "pick up cup," and "get water" from the practical operation.

When encountering similar goals later, the agent can directly retrieve existing skills and flexibly adjust the plan according to the current environment.

This method of compressing past experiences along the temporal dimension is called temporal abstraction. It allows AI to imitate humans, solidifying a series of scattered actions into mature skills and using combinations of these skills to accomplish more complex tasks.

In addition, the Oak architecture has another design goal fundamentally different from current deep learning:

The learning phase will neither store historical data nor replay past experiences.

Current deep reinforcement learning often places a large amount of historical experience into a replay buffer for repeated sampling and training.

Oak Lab envisions using a real-time learning approach with a batch size of 1, updating immediately after obtaining each new piece of experience.

The team believes that if such algorithms are combined with event-driven neural networks, the required computation and energy consumption of the system could drop by several orders of magnitude, making continuous, real-time learning truly feasible.

Hence the long-term goal: a trillion parameters, real-time learning, real-time planning, 20-watt power consumption.

Of course, this is still just a concept for now.

There is also a theoretical cornerstone behind Oak Lab, originating from the Big World Hypothesis jointly proposed by Sutton and Javed.

The core idea is: the real world will always be more complex than AI. Even as models become more powerful, the amount of data in the external environment will similarly explode.

Models trained on pre-organized data cannot keep up with real-world changes.

AI must learn to selectively remember useful content, appropriately forget outdated information, and continuously learn online to adapt to the real world.

From "The Bitter Lesson" to Entrepreneurship

Those familiar with Sutton's work won't be surprised by the views above.

In 2019, he wrote the widely circulated short essay in the AI field: "The Bitter Lesson."

The article reviewed the developmental histories of chess, Go, speech recognition, and computer vision, concluding:

General methods leveraging computation and search that scale with computation ultimately outperform methods reliant on human-crafted knowledge in the long run.

In the era of large models, this path seems to have received strong validation: larger models, more data, and greater computing power have driven AI capabilities to soar.

Yet Sutton remains unsatisfied with today's mainstream deep learning.

In his view, current systems still heavily rely on data that has been produced, curated, and organized by humans.

What models learn is primarily things humans have already written, photographed, or labeled in the past.

A true intelligent agent needs to generate new experiences through its own actions and use those experiences to pursue long-term goals.

This also explains why he has progressed from "The Bitter Lesson" to the "Era of Experience."

In 2025, he, together with AlphaGo core figure David Silver, proposed that AI would gradually shift from relying on human data to depending on experiences generated by agents interacting with the environment.

Oak Lab is precisely the entrepreneurial embodiment of this research proposition.

Forty years ago, when Sutton wrote about "temporal credit assignment in reinforcement learning" in his doctoral dissertation, reinforcement learning was a niche field.

Forty years later, while the whole world chases the commercialization wave of large models, he is still asking the same question—

How does intelligence truly come about?

One More Thing

The first stop for the founder after launching his startup: Shanghai WAIC (World AI Conference).

At the WAIC Thinkers Forum, Sutton will deliver a keynote speech titled "The First Principles of Reinforcement Learning: Cultivating Superintelligence from Experience."

Reference link: https://x.com/RichardSSutton/status/2076663628301058329

This article is from the WeChat public account "QbitAI," author: Focus on Frontier Technology.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the name of the new AI research lab founded by Richard Sutton and what is its ultimate goal?

AThe new lab is called Oak Lab. Its ultimate goal is to build a trillion-parameter agent capable of real-time learning and planning, with a total power consumption of only 20 watts, which is comparable to the human brain.

QAccording to the article, why did Richard Sutton leave Keen Technologies to start Oak Lab?

ASutton left Keen Technologies because he believes current deep learning approaches are fragile and inefficient. He seeks a fundamental paradigm shift, advocating for a complete reconstruction of AI based on new foundational ideas, rather than incremental improvements.

QWhat is the core research direction of Oak Lab, as described by the OaK architecture?

AThe core direction revolves around the OaK (Options and Knowledge) architecture. It aims to enable agents to discover temporally abstract structures from their own experience, turning sequences of actions into reusable skills (options) that can be validated, planned with, and invoked to solve complex tasks.

QHow does the proposed learning method at Oak Lab differ from mainstream deep reinforcement learning?

AOak Lab's proposed method performs real-time learning with a batch size of 1, updating immediately with each new piece of experience. It does not store historical data in a replay buffer for repeated sampling, unlike current deep reinforcement learning which heavily relies on experience replay.

QWhat major AI concept did Richard Sutton popularize in 2019, and how does it relate to his current venture?

AHe popularized 'The Bitter Lesson,' which argues that general methods that leverage computation, like search and learning, ultimately outperform systems relying on human-crafted knowledge. His current venture, Oak Lab, extends this by moving from reliance on static human data to learning from an agent's own continuous, real-time experience in pursuit of long-term goals.

Letture associate

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

"Token Repurchase and Burn: An Empty Promise? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity" Holding company stock grants shareholders residual claim rights - a legally enforceable entitlement to remaining assets after all other obligations are paid. This comes with rights like voting, dividends, and a share in sale proceeds. Crypto protocols have long promised token holders similar benefits: governance participation and a share of future growth. However, this narrative is fundamentally flawed and built on voluntary promises, not enforceable legal rights. The core difference is that token holders lack any legally enforceable claim to a protocol's underlying value or revenues. Common mechanisms like using protocol revenue to buy back and burn tokens are purely discretionary; the team can alter or stop the policy at any time. Token holders have no legal recourse. This rights gap becomes critically apparent when protocols introduce traditional equity alongside tokens, as seen with Venice AI's $65M funding round. Equity investors hold legal contracts with rights to company assets and profits, while token holders' benefits depend entirely on the continued goodwill of the protocol's management. The acquisition of Houdini Swap, where equity holders were paid while token holders received nothing, starkly illustrates this disparity. Upcoming legislation like the CLARITY Act threatens to eliminate the regulatory gray area that has allowed this ambiguous "pseudo-equity" narrative. The Act would classify tokens as either digital commodities (regulated by CFTC) or investment contract assets/securities (regulated by SEC). Protocols aiming for the "digital commodity" classification would be explicitly prohibited from granting token holders any legal claim to corporate revenue, profits, or assets. Promising that tokens will appreciate from protocol profits would likely classify them as securities. Projects like Aave are attempting technical solutions, such as its automated, on-chain "Aavenomics 3.0" buyback mechanism. However, this remains code that the governance body could still vote to change, not an immutable legal contract. The industry faces a clear fork: either acknowledge tokens as digital commodities and stop promising economic rights tied to corporate profits, or formally register tokens as securities and bear the associated compliance burden. The decade-long narrative equating tokens with ownership is built on unenforceable promises. The entry of traditional equity investors with real legal rights exposes this foundational weakness, which may unravel with the next major funding deal.

Foresight News2 h fa

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

Foresight News2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片