Rhythm X Zhihu Event Agenda Released: Skills Demo + Keynote Speech + Roundtable to Thoroughly Explain Agents and On-Chain Finance

marsbitPubblicato 2026-04-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-17

Introduzione

The recent dispute between EvoMap and Hermes over alleged抄袭, similar to the Claude and OpenClaw case, highlights a growing trend in the Agent ecosystem. These conflicts arise from competition over user choice—specifically, which Agent users select for similar tasks—and the definition of original core competencies. Such public disagreements indicate that competition among Agents has intensified to the point where founders are losing their composure. Ultimately, users hold the decision-making power. This issue foreshadows a broader challenge: as Agents become more numerous and capable, how should individuals navigate this evolving landscape? This topic will be explored in-depth at the upcoming event.

You must have some understanding of the incident where EvoMap accused Hermes of plagiarism.

Just like Claude accusing OpenClaw of plagiarism, similar incidents are bound to become increasingly common.

Because fundamentally, it's about territory: which Agent users choose for similar tasks, or where the boundaries of original core competitiveness lie within Agents. This dispute illustrates one thing—the competition among Agents has become so real that it can make founders lose their composure. The choice rests in the hands of users.

This is also an issue we will all soon face: as Agents become more numerous and capable of handling many tasks, what should we do? This is precisely the question we will explore at our event.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main topic of the upcoming event mentioned in the article?

AThe event will focus on Agent technology and on-chain finance, featuring Skills Demo, keynote speeches, and roundtable discussions to thoroughly explain these topics.

QWhat recent controversy in the Agent space does the article reference?

AThe article references the controversy where EvoMap accused Hermes of plagiarism, similar to how Claude accused OpenClaw of copying, indicating increasing competition among Agents.

QWhat does the article suggest about user choice in the Agent ecosystem?

AThe article suggests that users have the ultimate choice in selecting which Agent to use for similar tasks, and this user preference is driving intense competition among Agent developers.

QAccording to the article, why are founders of Agent projects becoming less calm?

AFounders are losing冷静 because competition among Agents has become so real and intense that it is leading to public accusations of plagiarism and disputes over original boundaries of core competitiveness.

QWhat key question does the article say the event will address regarding Agents?

AThe event will address the question of how users should navigate the growing number of Agents and the many tasks they can perform, exploring the challenges and choices in the Agent ecosystem.

Letture associate

South Korea's 'Kimchi Premium' Turns Negative, The Crypto Trading Powerhouse Ultimately Becomes A Stock Trading Powerhouse

South Korea's cryptocurrency "Kimchi Premium," historically a hallmark of high retail speculation and capital controls, has turned negative for the first time. This indicates a significant shift: Korean retail investors are withdrawing funds from the crypto market, driven by several factors. Firstly, the broader crypto market, especially altcoins, is struggling, dampening speculative interest. Secondly, the Korean stock market has nearly doubled in value over the past year, attracting liquidity away from digital assets. Major tech companies like Samsung and SK Hynix have led this surge. Finally, the government's confirmed plan to implement crypto taxation starting next year is influencing market preferences. Real-time data from a Korean monitoring channel shows a consistent 2-3% discount ("reverse Kimchi Premium") for cryptocurrencies like USDT in Korea compared to global prices, confirming weak domestic buying pressure. This persistent discount underscores a sustained capital outflow. The shift from premium to discount is highly symbolic, reflecting Korea's transition from a "crypto trading powerhouse" to one increasingly focused on its booming stock market, which now ranks as the world's sixth-largest by market capitalization.

marsbit13 min fa

South Korea's 'Kimchi Premium' Turns Negative, The Crypto Trading Powerhouse Ultimately Becomes A Stock Trading Powerhouse

marsbit13 min fa

Silicon Valley's New FDE Role Gains Popularity: What Kind of AI Talent Do Enterprises Need?

The Silicon Valley job market is seeing a resurgence of the Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE) role, originally pioneered by Palantir, now focused on AI. Companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are deploying AI FDEs to client sites to customize general-purpose large language models into specific Agent workflows for business processes. However, the article argues that the broader and more significant trend is the rise of the in-house "AI Engineer." These professionals, needed in far greater numbers than external FDEs, integrate AI capabilities—like prompt engineering, Agent frameworks, and evaluation systems—directly into a company's own software and operations, often using AI coding tools. This evolution suggests AI's impact on employment is not simply about replacement but about creating new, generalist roles that will later specialize, much like software engineering split into front-end, back-end, and DevOps. The future is likely to see a proliferation of specialized AI engineering roles (e.g., LLMOps, Evals Engineer), but the current and critical demand is for engineers who blend technical skill with business understanding to embed AI effectively, ensuring companies retain flexibility in their technology choices.

marsbit15 min fa

Silicon Valley's New FDE Role Gains Popularity: What Kind of AI Talent Do Enterprises Need?

marsbit15 min fa

How Far Is a16z from Going Public? $60 Billion, 7 Funds, Building Its Own Media Empire — Silicon Valley VC Is Becoming the Next Blackstone

Title: How Far Is a16z from an IPO? $60 Billion AUM, 7 Funds, Owned Media – Silicon Valley VC Is Becoming the Next Blackstone Summary: Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) is positioning itself for a public listing, following the path of asset managers like Blackstone. Managing roughly $600 billion and recently raising $15 billion across seven specialized funds, a16z has built a multi-strategy platform beyond traditional VC. Key preparatory moves include obtaining Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) status in 2019, which allows holding public securities, and constructing its own media infrastructure (Future, a16z.news, Turpentine network) to control its public narrative—a crucial need for a publicly traded entity. The firm has signaled its ambition to become a "lasting company" beyond a partnership structure. Analysts suggest a potential IPO timeline of 2028-2030, after the current AI investment cycle matures. If a16z goes public, it could force a structural shift across the VC industry, pushing other major firms to follow suit and build similar permanent capital and media capabilities.

marsbit17 min fa

How Far Is a16z from Going Public? $60 Billion, 7 Funds, Building Its Own Media Empire — Silicon Valley VC Is Becoming the Next Blackstone

marsbit17 min fa

Selling 32 BTC to Pay Dividends: Strategy Breaks the 'Never Sell' Vow

On June 1st, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) disclosed in an SEC filing that it sold 32 BTC between May 26-31 for approximately $2.5 million at an average price of $77,135. The proceeds were explicitly used to pay dividends on its preferred stock series. While negligible compared to its 843,706 BTC holdings and recent $2 billion monthly purchases, this move broke its long-standing "never sell" policy, signaling a shift in capital management. This sale is linked to Strategy's substantial dividend obligations from preferred stock issued since early 2025, which have consumed a significant portion of its dedicated $2.25 billion cash reserve. During a recent earnings call, the CEO mentioned "disciplined sale of bitcoin" as a potential tool, foreshadowing this event. Analysts note the financial impact is minimal, but the symbolic precedent is significant, indicating future sales are possible if cash reserves dwindle. The disclosure coincided with Bitcoin's price falling below $72,000 amid broader market weakness, including record monthly outflows from spot Bitcoin ETFs in May. Strategy is not alone; Q1 2026 saw other corporate Bitcoin holders like MARA, Riot Platforms, and Nakamoto Holdings collectively selling tens of thousands of BTC for debt repayment, liquidity, or strategic shifts, reversing the previous "buy and hold" corporate treasury trend.

marsbit20 min fa

Selling 32 BTC to Pay Dividends: Strategy Breaks the 'Never Sell' Vow

marsbit20 min fa

AI Competition's New Battlefield: Long-term Memory Becomes the Pain Point, How Users Can Secure Their Own Context Ownership

A new front is emerging in the AI competition: user ownership of long-term memory and context. As AI models like ChatGPT evolve from chat tools into persistent digital assistants that learn user preferences and workflows, a critical question arises: who owns this accumulated "memory"? Currently, this personalized data is siloed within each platform (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), creating a fragmented experience when users switch models. The article highlights ZetaChain's strategic pivot from blockchain interoperability to addressing this AI "memory" challenge. Its new focus is on building a "Private Memory Layer" and an "AI Consumer Layer." Through its consumer product Anuma, ZetaChain aims to give users encrypted, portable memory that can be used across different AI models. This system also envisions programmable, auditable permissions for AI agents and a framework where user knowledge can be monetized as shareable assets. Ultimately, ZetaChain's transformation reflects a broader infrastructure shift. The future bottleneck is less about raw model capability and more about continuous context, user-controlled identity, and permission management across multiple collaborating AI agents. The company's ZETA token is being repositioned as an "AI infrastructure token" to facilitate access, payments, and permissions within this proposed ecosystem. The core narrative advocates for returning control of personal context and AI relationships to users, rather than leaving them locked within proprietary platforms.

marsbit25 min fa

AI Competition's New Battlefield: Long-term Memory Becomes the Pain Point, How Users Can Secure Their Own Context Ownership

marsbit25 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片