Recent Mass Shutdowns of DeFi Protocols: They All Have One Thing in Common

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-06

Introduzione

In recent months, multiple DeFi protocols have announced shutdowns, not due to exit scams but because of a lack of users, funding, or both. Projects like Angle Protocol, Polynomial, MilkyWay, and Step Finance—despite having functional products and significant past traction—were unable to sustain operations. Common challenges included an inability to attract liquidity (especially critical in derivatives), failure to achieve product-market fit, and high costs of expanding to new chains or narratives. Many teams pivoted repeatedly to chase trends like restaking or real-world assets but ran out of capital before finding sustainable demand. Others, like ZeroLend, suffered from deploying on smaller blockchains that lost liquidity during market downturns. Despite these failures, the projects shut down responsibly, allowing users to withdraw funds and avoiding reckless token launches—a sign of industry maturation compared to the reckless exits of 2022.

Author: Ignas

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Over the past two months, at least 10 crypto protocols have announced their closure. Not rug pulls, but due to no users, no money, or both.

Not to mention mining companies like BlockFills and lending platforms freezing withdrawals. Just yesterday, Angle also announced (https://x.com/AngleProtocol/status/2029161525580112263) the gradual shutdown of its EURA and USDA stablecoins, despite having reached a Total Value Locked (TVL) of $250 million and having strong business partnerships.

Angle stated bluntly in the announcement, "The decentralized stablecoin landscape has completely changed. Yield-bearing stablecoins today are essentially just branded wrappers over existing vaults and lending protocols; there's no longer a need to maintain a separate, independent infrastructure."

These shuttered projects almost all had functional products:

Polynomial processed a cumulative trading volume of $4 billion across 70 markets
MilkyWay's TVL once reached $250 million
Step Finance had a peak of 300,000 monthly active users

I've used, or at least tried, these products. The technology wasn't the issue, but no one was willing to pay the fees needed for the projects to survive.

MilkyWay is a typical example: four pivots in less than two years. Starting with Celestia liquid staking, then moving to restaking, RWA tokenization, and crypto debit cards for rent payments... each pivot chased the hype of the moment.

Their description of the restaking pivot is poignant: "We identified the restaking opportunity early, designed the system, TVL to $250M, completed security audits, and were ready to launch. But the market moved on from restaking faster than anyone anticipated."

In the end, they had to admit the funding wouldn't last long enough to find product-market fit.

The Polynomial team was brutally honest about the reason for failure, offering a lesson for all perpetual contract projects: "In derivatives, good tech is useless. We improved execution speed, optimized UX, built innovative infrastructure, but none of it mattered. Traders go where the liquidity is. We didn't have it. Everything else is just a nice-to-have feature."

The conclusion is even harsher: "Liquidity is the only moat in derivatives. You can't beat liquidity with innovation, you can't beat it with marketing, you can't beat it with development."

ZeroLend's shutdown sounds a warning bell for dApps trying to launch on multiple blockchains. They bet on supporting projects on niche chains like Manta, Zircuit, and Xlayer, but when the market turned bearish, liquidity on these chains dried up, and oracle providers stopped their services.

Ultimately, operating at a long-term loss was unsustainable.

Aave recently also voted to shut down services on several chains, citing the same reason of unprofitable operation.

Then there's Parsec, once a legendary tool in the circle used to track Terra, 3AC, and the stETH depeg. But the team admitted, "After the FTX collapse, DeFi spot trading, lending, and leverage never returned to their former state. The market changed, on-chain behavior changed, and we didn't truly understand it."

Simply put, the market moved on, and we were left behind. The market is cruel.

Slingshot was acquired and completely shut down. Eden cut 80% of its unprofitable products, keeping only the core business.

As they said, "The 80/20 rule became a reality; the products that cost us 80% of our expenses brought in only 20% of the revenue."

Finally, Step Finance's case is more unique: it was hacked for $26 million on January 31st, which was a death sentence. "We tried fundraising, acquisition, nothing worked."

What's the common thread among these deceased projects? They failed to adapt to the ever-changing market and lacked sufficient capital to pivot again.

Each team bet on a particular ecosystem experiencing explosive growth, but the growth either wasn't fast enough or didn't happen at all. Celestia DeFi never truly took off, on-chain derivatives struggled to compete with Hyperliquid, and even established platforms like dYdX and GMX are having a hard time.

And expanding into new chains and narrative areas is costly.

For players like me, moving funds from one platform to another is effortless and cheap. But applications need to invest significant time and financial resources to prepare for potential new user bases.

The good news is, these were all "dignified deaths." All projects gave users time to withdraw funds; the teams didn't run away or issue tokens to cash out. Compared to the outright rug pulls of 2022, the industry has indeed learned to die responsibly.

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the common reason behind the recent shutdowns of multiple DeFi protocols?

AThe common reason is that these protocols failed to adapt to the rapidly changing market conditions and lacked sufficient funding to pivot or sustain operations, despite having functional products.

QAccording to Angle Protocol, why did they decide to shut down their stablecoin operations?

AAngle Protocol stated that the decentralized stablecoin landscape has fundamentally changed, and yield-bearing stablecoins are now essentially just branded wrappers over existing vaults and lending protocols, making it unnecessary to maintain independent infrastructure.

QWhat did Polynomial identify as the only moat in the derivatives space?

APolynomial identified liquidity as the only moat in the derivatives space, emphasizing that innovation, marketing, or development cannot overcome the advantage of liquidity.

QWhat lesson did ZeroLend's shutdown provide for decentralized applications?

AZeroLend's shutdown served as a warning for dApps launching on multiple blockchains, as betting on smaller chains like Manta and Xlayer led to liquidity drying up and oracle services halting when the bear market hit.

QHow did the shutdowns of these protocols demonstrate responsible behavior compared to past incidents?

AThese protocols allowed users time to withdraw funds, did not engage in exit scams, and avoided issuing worthless tokens, showing that the industry has learned to 'die responsibly' compared to the outright fraud seen in 2022.

Letture associate

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit55 min fa

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit55 min fa

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit55 min fa

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit55 min fa

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

Coldcard hardware wallet users are facing a new wave of coordinated attacks targeting a firmware flaw, with researcher Alex Thorn flagging 218 recent transactions moving approximately 389 Bitcoin from potentially impacted addresses. The attack pattern shows a high rate of transactions targeting unique victim addresses, differing from previous waves. The vulnerability, which causes affected devices to generate weaker wallet seeds, is estimated to have impacted over 1,100 wallets, leading to around $90 million in Bitcoin stolen. Thorn advises affected users who control their keys may attempt to move funds with a higher-fee transaction before the attacker's transactions are confirmed.

cointelegraph1 h fa

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

cointelegraph1 h fa

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbit1 h fa

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbit1 h fa

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit1 h fa

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ONE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Harmony (ONE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HarmonyONE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Harmony (ONE)Dopo aver acquistato Harmony (ONE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Harmony (ONE)Scambia facilmente Harmony (ONE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

430 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ONE ONE sono presentate come di seguito.