Raoul Pal: I've Seen Every Panic, They Are Never the End

marsbitPubblicato 2026-02-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-06

Introduzione

Raoul Pal reflects on the brutal emotional toll of market crashes, drawing from his 38 years of experience in trading and investing, including his time in crypto since 2013. He recounts buying Bitcoin at $200, watching it drop 75%, then rise 10x, only to fall 87% in the 2014 bear market. Throughout multiple cycles—including the 2017 bull run with severe drawdowns and the COVID crash—he emphasizes that panic and severe sell-offs, while painful, have consistently been followed by recoveries and new highs. Key lessons include: HODLing often outperforms timing the market; adding during downturns compounds returns; and managing emotional and financial risk is essential. He stresses the importance of personal conviction (DYOR—Do Your Own Research), avoiding leverage, and sizing positions to minimize future regret. Pal sees the current environment as similar to mid-2021—a panic within a bull market—and is buying digital art and increasing crypto exposure accordingly. He concludes that volatility is the price paid for long-term compounding returns.

It feels brutal out there, hopeless. It's all over. You missed it. You screwed up again.

Everyone is angry and confused. Even those who saw it coming can't help but feel a bit smug, but many also know how much pain such price action can cause. These moments always feel like the worst of times.

I've been in the markets for 38 years (today's sell-off is my 'birthday gift', plus food poisoning last night!), and I've seen every type of crash and panic.

They all feel the same, terrible.

I entered the crypto market in 2013, buying Bitcoin for the first time at $200. It went up for a while after I bought, then fell 75%... and that was still a bull market, with the price eventually reaching over 10 times my purchase price. I didn't sell because it was a long-term investment, and I understood the risks. Then, in the 2014 bear market, it fell another 87%.

In the bull market leading up to 2017, I experienced three 35%–45% pullbacks... brutal. I eventually sold near $2000 (the 2013 previous high) due to the Bitcoin fork war. I had made 10 times my initial investment. But then it went up another 10 times (!!) by the end of the year, before starting another big, ugly bear market.

I sat out that entire bear market, and it felt good at the time.

During the pandemic crash, I bought back in at $6500 (3.5 times higher than my selling price). It turned out to be an expensive mistake of 'thinking I did the right thing'.

From April to July 2021, Bitcoin fell 50% in a market environment similar to today's. The sentiment on Twitter was awful, truly awful. But that time, the market wasn't as severely oversold as it is today...

By November 2021, the market was back at all-time highs: SOL was up 13x from its low, ETH doubled, and Bitcoin hit a new high, up 150%.

I've lived through all of this, all those terrifying, gut-wrenching moments, all happening within a long-term bull market.

I first bought at $200, and the price is now $65,000. I even missed a 3.5x move in the middle due to poor timing.

The first key lesson (for me): In a long-term upward trending asset, the best strategy is often to do nothing. 'HODL' became a meme for a good reason. It's more powerful than the 'four-year cycle' meme.

Second lesson: Be decisive about adding to your position during declines. Even if you can't perfectly time the bottom, consistently adding to your overall position during weakness compounds returns even more than dollar-cost averaging (DCA) in the long run.

I don't always have enough cash to buy heavily on the dips, but I always buy a little—it's crucial for mental training.

It always feels like: the opportunity is missed, it's not coming back, everything will collapse completely.

But that's not the case.

Ask yourself two questions: Will tomorrow be more digital than today? Will fiat currency be worth less tomorrow than it is today?

If the answer to both is 'yes', then keep going. BTFD, let 'time in the market' beat 'timing the market', because it always does. Adding significantly during large pullbacks dramatically lowers your cost basis, and that makes a huge difference.

Stress, fear, and self-doubt are the inevitable 'tax' on this journey.

Size your position according to your own risk tolerance. Don't worry, when prices fall, everyone feels their position is too large; when they rise, it feels too small. All you need to do is manage these emotions and find your own 'sweet spot'.

Another key point: Don't borrow someone else's conviction.

'DYOR' is a very important meme; without it, you simply won't get through these phases. Earn your conviction yourself. Borrowed conviction is like leverage—it will blow you up eventually.

Remember: When you're busy blaming others, you're really blaming yourself.

Yes, it feels dark right now. But soon, the sun will rise again, and this will just be another scar on the journey (provided you didn't use leverage! Leverage leads to permanent capital loss—you lose your chips at the casino). Never lose your chips.

When will this all end? I don't know, but I think it's more like April to November 2021—a panic within a bull market. I think it will end soon. Even if I'm wrong, I won't change my approach: as long as I have some cash, I'll keep adding.

But for you, it might be different. Try to build a 'regret minimization' portfolio: Could you handle another 50% drop from here? If not, then reduce your position, even if it seems stupid. The right mindset is crucial for survival. My mindset is 'how can I buy more', and yours might be the opposite.

There will always be timing experts who perfectly catch the decline, selling out or shorting. They will always exist. But honestly, you just need to tell yourself: this kind of thing can happen at any time. That way, when it does happen, you won't be as anxious because you expected it! It's just part of the story, not the whole story.

So what am I doing now?

I'm starting to buy some digital art (which also increases my ETH exposure), and I plan to continue increasing my crypto asset allocation over the next week—just like I do every time I get this opportunity.

I bought the pandemic crash, the 2021 pullback, the 2022 decline, the 2023 decline, and I'll do the same in 2024, 2025. I'll do it again this time. Every time, my profit and loss hits new highs before the market does, it's almost like magic. Again: BTFD!

Good luck. It's never easy.

Volatility is the price we pay for long-term compound returns. Embrace it.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to Raoul Pal, what is the most effective strategy for a long-term upward trending asset?

AThe best strategy is often to do nothing, as 'HODL' is a meme for a good reason, and it's more powerful than the 'four-year cycle' meme.

QWhat two questions does Raoul Pal suggest asking oneself during market downturns?

AWill tomorrow be more digital than today? And will fiat currency be worth less tomorrow than today? If the answers are 'yes', then continue forward.

QWhat does Raoul Pal compare borrowed conviction to, and why is it dangerous?

AHe compares borrowed conviction to leverage, stating it will blow you up eventually because it isn't earned and won't sustain you through difficult market phases.

QWhat key action does Raoul Pal recommend during market sell-offs, and what is its psychological benefit?

AHe recommends adding to your position during sell-offs. The psychological benefit is that it trains your mind to act against the feeling that the opportunity is gone and everything will collapse.

QWhat framework does Raoul Pal propose for managing one's portfolio to ensure survival?

AHe suggests building a 'regret minimization' portfolio by asking if you can handle a further 50% drop from current levels. If not, you should reduce your position to maintain the correct mindset for survival.

Letture associate

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Bitcoin is approaching a critical block height of 961,632, which could activate the controversial BIP-110 proposal. This proposal aims to restrict the amount of non-financial data, such as inscriptions and other large data payloads, within Bitcoin transactions. Supporters, including some node operators and Bitcoin purists, argue that BIP-110 is necessary to preserve Bitcoin's core function as a monetary settlement layer by reducing network congestion and node operational burdens caused by non-essential data. They frame it as a correction to keep the network true to its original purpose. However, critics, including prominent figures like Blockstream's Adam Back and developer Jameson Lopp, warn that the proposal's implementation mechanism is dangerously flawed. They highlight that its low 55% miner signaling threshold, coupled with a contentious enforcement mechanism allowing nodes to unilaterally reject non-compliant blocks, significantly increases the risk of a chain split. Opponents argue this sets a dangerous precedent for transaction censorship, undermines Bitcoin's protocol neutrality, and creates excessive uncertainty for developers and businesses, especially since the rule is proposed as a temporary one-year measure. Market analysts, such as those from Bitfinex, suggest a full-scale network split is unlikely due to a lack of broad economic consensus. Major mining pools remain neutral, and adoption of the new rules is minimal. They view the situation more as a governance stress test. The primary risk is operational disruption: if a minority chain persists, major exchanges and custodians may need to temporarily suspend Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals to manage security and liquidity, potentially unsettling newer institutional investors. While BIP-110 is not expected to succeed in overtaking the main chain, its approach has ignited a significant debate about Bitcoin's governance, core values, and resilience.

Foresight News4 min fa

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Foresight News4 min fa

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit1 h fa

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit1 h fa

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

After Alphabet's announcement of an $84.75 billion equity financing round, market focus for AI investment is shifting from pure growth narratives to capital efficiency and payback periods. The core argument is that AI is being re-priced from a software-like growth story into a heavy-asset infrastructure cycle, requiring massive capital expenditure (CapEx) on chips, data centers, and power grids. While Alphabet's financing itself is not a distress signal—part of it is for administrative purposes like tax obligations on stock compensation—it highlights the enormous capital demands of AI infrastructure. This demand extends beyond tech giants to pure-play AI model companies (like OpenAI, Anthropic), data center REITs, and utilities. Major tech firms are projected to spend heavily on AI data centers in 2026, signaling a broad-based capital cycle the market must absorb. Consequently, valuation logic is changing. Investors are moving away from questions about who has the strongest AI narrative and are now prioritizing clear visibility into orders, stable cash flows, and the cost of capital. This has led to recent pressure on high-multiple AI software and semiconductor stocks, while "picks-and-shovels" hardware, data center, and power assets with firmer near-term demand may see relative support. The key going forward will be monitoring whether rising CapEx guidance across companies is matched by a timely monetization of AI investments into revenue and cash flow. The market's tolerance for high spending depends on demonstrable returns. While the long-term AI thesis remains intact, the valuation framework has fundamentally shifted to emphasize capital discipline and payback speed.

marsbit1 h fa

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片