Raising $82.5 Million: What is Superstate, Built by Compound Founder?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-23

Introduzione

Superstate, founded by Compound's Robert Leshner, has raised $82.5 million in a Series B round led by Bain Capital Crypto and Distributed Global. The real-world asset (RWA) tokenization platform plans to expand from tokenized treasury products to a full on-chain equity issuance layer on Ethereum and Solana. Launched in 2023, Superstate initially focused on tokenized short-term U.S. government bond funds. It has since introduced additional products, including a crypto carry fund, and registered a digital transfer agent with the SEC. Its “Opening Bell” platform enables compliant, native issuance of tokenized stocks on blockchain networks, with companies like Galaxy and Exodus already participating. Superstate’s AUM now exceeds $1.2 billion. The company aims to bridge traditional finance with on-chain infrastructure, improving settlement speed, liquidity, and capital efficiency. While early adoption is largely institutional, tokenized assets are increasingly integrated into DeFi for collateral and lending, signaling broader functional use in digital finance ecosystems.

On January 22, Superstate, an RWA tokenized asset management platform founded by Compound creator Robert Leshner, announced the completion of an $82.5 million Series B funding round. The round was led by Bain Capital Crypto and Distributed Global, with participation from Haun Ventures, Brevan Howard Digital, Galaxy Digital, Sentinel Global, Bullish, Hypersphere Capital, Flowdesk, Intersection, and existing investors 1kx, ParaFi, and Road Capital.

Officials stated that this round of funding will be used to expand its business from tokenized treasury products to a fully on-chain stock issuance layer on Ethereum and Solana. Additionally, the company will continue to invest in regulated market infrastructure, including compliant issuance, settlement, and shareholder record-keeping systems, and expand its Opening Bell platform and transfer agent infrastructure to support more issuers and distribution channels.

What is Superstate?

In 2023, Compound founder Robert Leshner filed documents with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for his new company "Superstate," which would use Ethereum as an auxiliary record-keeping tool to create a short-term government bond fund. Superstate's fund would invest in "ultra-short-term government securities," including U.S. Treasuries, government agency securities, and other government-backed instruments, and would rely on traditional Wall Street "transfer agents" to maintain ownership records of fund holders.

In June, Superstate announced the completion of a $4 million seed funding round led by ParaFi, Cumberland, and 1kx.

In November of the same year, Superstate completed the first close of its Series A funding round, raising $14 million. The round was co-led by Distributed Global and CoinFund, with participation from Breyer Capital, Galaxy, Arrington Capital, Road Capital, CMT Digital, Folius Ventures, Nascent, Hack VC, Modular Capital, and Department of XYZ.

In February 2024, it launched a tokenized fund holding short-term U.S. Treasuries. In July, Superstate launched a new tokenized fund, the Superstate Crypto Carry Fund (USCC). This fund will use a "cash and carry" investment strategy to generate yield by purchasing spot Bitcoin and Ethereum and holding equivalent short positions or selling BTC and ETH futures to generate returns for holders. The spot assets are held by custody partner Anchorage Digital.

Superstate's Tokenization Development

In March 2025, Superstate announced that its digital transfer agent company, Superstate Services LLC, had registered with the SEC, a move aimed at connecting tokenized assets with the existing financial regulatory framework.

After this, benefiting from the U.S. push for RWA tokenization, Superstate's progress accelerated rapidly. The company first launched the Opening Bell platform, allowing SEC-registered public stocks to be issued and traded directly on blockchain networks, initially supporting Solana. Opening Bell supports the native issuance of compliant, regulated stocks that can interact directly with crypto wallets, DeFi protocols, and on-chain markets.

Subsequently, several companies chose to issue tokenized stocks on Superstate, including Galaxy's tokenized stock GLXY; U.S.-listed self-custody wallet company Exodus also plans to partner with Superstate to create common stock tokens, digitally representing Exodus' Class A shares; Solana treasury company Forward Industries (FORD) intends to tokenize its holdings of Forward Industries common shares. It also plans to partner with Drift, Kamino, and Jupiter Lend (three of the largest lending protocols on Solana) to use the tokenized FORD shares as eligible collateral; Ethereum treasury company SharpLink Gaming partnered with Superstate to issue tokenized stock SBET directly on the Ethereum blockchain.

In late 2025, Superstate launched a new blockchain-based service for conducting issuance programs directly on Ethereum and Solana. This service will enable companies to raise capital by issuing on-chain securities, including tokenized versions of their existing SEC-registered shares or new share classes. The first issuers are expected to go live in 2026. Investors will pay in stablecoins and receive tokenized assets.

The Series B funding round at the beginning of 2026 brings Superstate's total funding to over $100 million. According to its website, its Assets Under Management (AUM) now exceed $1.2 billion.

The Tokenization Process in 2026

The main theme of capital market infrastructure in 2026 is clear: faster settlement, higher liquidity, greater transparency, and lower capital requirements. Tokenization is moving from concept to practice at this time because the on-chain track is pulling issuance, distribution, custody, settlement, and asset reuse into the same set of programmable data and processes, with participants beginning to make decisions based on efficiency and verifiable results.

Incremental on-chain channels will emerge first on the financing side. In the short term, a dual-track model with traditional markets and on-chain markets operating in parallel will be more common. Traditional trading platforms handle deep liquidity, while on-chain markets provide more direct reach, faster distribution and settlement, and more flexible issuance structures. As compliant modules mature, this type of on-chain financing will expand from a few pilot projects to more scenarios like IPOs, additional issuances, and secondary offerings.

The key change on the asset side is the realization of functionality. Truly tokenized stocks and funds will not remain merely holding certificates but will gradually enter the DeFi ecosystem of collateral, lending, and composable strategies, moving traditional assets from isolated account structures to a composable on-chain capital market, thereby improving capital efficiency. However, this will also raise the requirements for compliance, risk control, clearing responsibilities, and technical security.

Stablecoins will become the engine driving demand for tokenized funds. As the scale of stablecoins expands, issuers and holders will have a stronger need for highly liquid, auditable, risk-controlled, and yield-generating on-chain assets. Therefore, tokenized short-duration treasury funds and money market-like products are more likely to become standard components for on-chain cash management and collateral. On the institutional side, custodial DeFi treasuries will become the main entry point, packaging multi-chain, multi-protocol, and 24/7 risk control into usable strategy interfaces, reducing operational and management costs for institutions.

The distribution end will continue to concentrate around super-apps. Wallets and trading platforms integrate payments, trading, yield, investment, and custody into a single product interface, with tokenized assets acting as connectors, helping users manage cash and long-term investments within the same system. For issuers and asset managers, the change in the distribution landscape is more critical. Those who can adapt early to the tokenized form, compliant transfer logic, and on-chain usability will more easily enter the supply pools of these super-apps and capture new growth.

Companies like Superstate may be among the first to reap significant rewards from the U.S. push for RWA tokenization. However, it seems the connection with ordinary investors will remain relatively weak in the short term, as early products are mostly targeted at institutions and accredited investors. Ordinary users primarily access them indirectly through wallets, trading platforms, and other entry points, and what they actually perceive is often not tokenization itself.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the founder of Superstate and what is his previous notable project?

AThe founder of Superstate is Robert Leshner, who is also the founder of the well-known DeFi lending protocol, Compound.

QWhat was the total amount raised in Superstate's Series B funding round and who were the lead investors?

ASuperstate raised $82.5 million in its Series B funding round, which was co-led by Bain Capital Crypto and Distributed Global.

QWhat is the primary business focus of Superstate as an RWA tokenization platform?

ASuperstate is a real-world asset (RWA) tokenization platform that focuses on creating tokenized funds, initially for short-term government securities like U.S. Treasuries, and has expanded to an on-chain equity issuance layer for stocks on Ethereum and Solana.

QWhat significant regulatory milestone did Superstate achieve in March 2025?

AIn March 2025, Superstate's digital transfer agent company, Superstate Services LLC, successfully registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

QWhat is the name of the platform Superstate launched for issuing and trading SEC-registered public stocks directly on a blockchain?

ASuperstate launched the 'Opening Bell' platform, which allows for the direct issuance and trading of SEC-registered public stocks on blockchain networks, with initial support for Solana.

Letture associate

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit2 min fa

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit2 min fa

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit3 min fa

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit3 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News13 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News13 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit30 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit30 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手42 min fa

Trading

Spot