Privacy coins slide sharply as sector posts double-digit weekly losses

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-22

Introduzione

Privacy-focused cryptocurrencies experienced significant declines over the past week, with most major tokens recording double-digit losses amid broad market weakness. Monero (XMR) led the downturn, falling approximately 28% to trade near $508. Other major privacy assets, including Dash (DASH) and Decred (DCR), dropped between 17–21%, while Zcash (ZEC) declined around 13%. Mid- and lower-cap tokens like Horizen (ZEN) and Zano (ZANO) also saw substantial losses, though Beldex (BDX) limited its decline to about 4%. The sector-wide sell-off reflects a risk-off environment rather than asset-specific factors, with sustained downward momentum and limited recovery attempts indicating persistent selling pressure. Near-term performance remains tied to broader market sentiment.

Privacy-focused cryptocurrencies recorded broad declines over the past seven days, with most major tokens posting double-digit losses amid continued weakness across the wider crypto market.

According to data from CryptoRank and CoinMarketCap, the privacy coin sector underperformed Bitcoin and several large-cap altcoins during the past week, as selling pressure intensified across assets linked to anonymity and transaction privacy.

Monero leads weekly losses

Monero [XMR], the largest privacy coin by market capitalization, saw the steepest decline among major tokens.

XMR fell by approximately 28% over the past seven days, trading around $508 at the time of writing. Despite a modest intraday bounce, weekly performance remains decisively negative.

Monero’s market capitalization stood at roughly $9.35 billion, with 24-hour trading volume near $143 million, reflecting sustained distribution rather than a brief volatility spike.

Dash, Decred and Zcash also under pressure

Dash [DASH] posted a 17–21% weekly decline, trading near $64, while Decred [DCR] fell roughly 21% over the same period, trading around $20. Both assets showed limited recovery attempts, with their seven-day charts continuing to trend lower.

Zcash [ZEC] recorded a comparatively small but still significant 13% drop over seven days, trading near $365. While ZEC showed short-term resilience relative to peers, the broader weekly trend remained bearish.

Smaller privacy tokens follow broader downtrend

Mid- and lower-cap privacy assets also reflected the sector-wide weakness. Horizen [ZEN] declined close to 18%, while Zano [ZANO] fell by approximately 11% over the past week.

Beldex [BDX] was one of the few relative outperformers, limiting losses to around 4% over seven days.

Across the board, short-term rebounds failed to offset sustained weekly declines, suggesting that selling pressure remained dominant throughout the sector.

Sector-wide weakness mirrors risk-off conditions

The synchronized decline across privacy coins suggests a broad risk-off environment rather than asset-specific catalysts.

While daily price movements showed occasional relief rallies, seven-day performance data indicates persistent downward momentum across the privacy narrative.

With most privacy tokens now trading well below recent local highs, the sector’s near-term direction appears closely tied to broader market sentiment rather than internal fundamentals.

Final Thoughts

Privacy coins underperformed the broader crypto market this week, with most major tokens posting double-digit losses.
Seven-day data shows sustained selling pressure across the sector, with limited signs of trend reversal so far.

Domande pertinenti

QWhich privacy coin experienced the steepest decline and what was the percentage drop?

AMonero (XMR) experienced the steepest decline, falling by approximately 28% over the past seven days.

QWhat was the weekly performance of Dash (DASH) and Decred (DCR)?

ADash (DASH) posted a 17–21% weekly decline, while Decred (DCR) fell roughly 21% over the same period.

QAccording to the article, what does the synchronized decline across privacy coins suggest about the market?

AThe synchronized decline suggests a broad risk-off environment rather than asset-specific catalysts, indicating the sector's near-term direction is tied to broader market sentiment.

QWhich privacy token was mentioned as a relative outperformer, limiting its losses for the week?

ABeldex (BDX) was a relative outperformer, limiting its losses to around 4% over the past seven days.

QWhat was Monero's (XMR) market capitalization and 24-hour trading volume at the time of writing?

AMonero's market capitalization stood at roughly $9.35 billion, with a 24-hour trading volume near $143 million.

Letture associate

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist10 min fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist10 min fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 h fa

marsbit1 h fa

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 h fa

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 h fa

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 h fa

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures