Polymarket trading figures are being ‘double-counted ’: Paradigm

cointelegraphPubblicato 2025-12-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-09

Introduzione

According to a Paradigm researcher, reported trading activity and volume on the prediction market platform Polymarket have been significantly inflated due to a data bug causing double-counting. The issue stems from Polymarket's complex onchain data, which emits redundant "OrderFilled" events for both makers and takers in a single trade. Major dashboards, including DefiLlama and Dune Analytics, mistakenly counted these as separate trades. This error impacts both notional and cashflow volume metrics. The discovery raises questions about Polymarket's recently reported success, including a $9 billion valuation from ICE based on potentially overstated volume figures. The researcher calls for more consistent and transparent reporting standards as prediction markets mature.

Some of the reported trading activity and volume of prediction market platform Polymarket may be significantly higher than actual reality due to a “data bug,” according to a researcher at Paradigm.

“It turns out almost every major dashboard has been double-counting Polymarket volume not related to wash trading,” said Storm, a researcher at the venture capital firm.

Storm explained that this was because “Polymarket’s onchain data contains redundant representations of each trade.”

“Polymarket’s onchain data is quite complex, and this has led to widespread adoption of flawed accounting methods.”

When trades occur on Polymarket, the system emits multiple “OrderFilled” events: one set for makers, who have existing orders, and another for takers, who execute the trade.

These events describe the same trade from different perspectives, not separate trades. However, many major dashboards have been combining them, counting the same volume twice.

Polymarket has been seen as a rare crypto success recently, as spot and derivatives markets have been in turmoil. The discovery that its headline metric may be incorrect across many dashboards could dent some of its perceived success.

Polymarket’s complex blockchain data

The researcher went on to explain that the accounting bug “inflates both types of volume metrics commonly used for prediction markets, notional volume and cashflow volume.”

“Polymarket’s data has been notoriously confusing for crypto data analysts ... the data has too many layers of interacting complexity to untangle using just a block explorer.”

Related: Polymarket plans to use in-house market maker to trade against users: Report

This complexity arises because Polymarket trades can be simple swaps or they can be “splits” and “merges” where both parties exchange cash for opposing positions.

The smart contracts emit redundant events for tracking purposes, and standard blockchain explorers don’t make this distinction clear, the researcher stated.

Cointelegraph contacted Polymarket for comment, but did not receive an immediate response.

Polymarket volumes using different metrics. Source: Paradigm

Polymarket is valued at $9 billion

The Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) valued the prediction platform at $9 billion this week, according to reports, citing $25 billion in trading volume, which could now be in question.

In September, it was reported that Polymarket was preparing for a US launch at a $10 billion valuation. In October, Bloomberg reported that it was looking to raise funds at a valuation between $12 billion and $15 billion.

Meanwhile, Dune Analytics reported that the platform achieved a monthly record of $3.7 billion in trading volume in November, but this may be double the actual figure if Paradigm’s research is correct.

“DefiLlama, Allium, Blockworks and many Dune dashboards were double-counting,” said the researcher.

Prediction markets are rapidly evolving into a critical financial sector, “and as the category matures, the industry should converge on consistent, transparent, and objective reporting standards,” the researcher concluded.

Magazine: XRP’s ‘now or never’ moment, Kalshi taps Solana: Hodler’s Digest

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main issue with Polymarket's trading figures as reported by Paradigm?

AThe main issue is that many major dashboards have been double-counting Polymarket's trading volume due to a data bug, where redundant 'OrderFilled' events for the same trade are incorrectly summed.

QWhy does Polymarket's onchain data cause this double-counting problem?

APolymarket's onchain data is complex and emits multiple 'OrderFilled' events for a single trade—one set for makers and another for takers—which describe the same trade from different perspectives but are often counted as separate transactions.

QWhich specific metrics are inflated by this accounting bug?

AThe bug inflates both notional volume and cashflow volume, which are the two common types of volume metrics used for prediction markets.

QWhat potential impact could this discovery have on Polymarket's perceived success and valuation?

AThe discovery could dent Polymarket's perceived success, as its reported trading volume—which was cited in its $9 billion valuation by ICE and previous fundraisers—may be significantly overstated, potentially raising questions about its true market activity.

QWhich data platforms were mentioned as double-counting Polymarket volume?

ADefiLlama, Allium, Blockworks, and many Dune dashboards were specifically mentioned as platforms that were double-counting the volume.

Letture associate

Chipsea Turns from A-share to H-share: Riding the Price Surge Trend, or Gambling on the Cycle?

Xintianxia Technology, a Chinese flash memory chipmaker, is making its second attempt to list on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange after withdrawing its application for a mainland China IPO in late 2023. This move coincides with an upcycle in the memory chip sector. Ranked fifth among global fabless code-type flash memory suppliers in 2025, Xintianxia specializes in NOR Flash and SLC NAND chips. However, it holds a small 1.3% global market share in this niche segment. The company is highly dependent on a concentrated group of suppliers, with its top five accounting for over 80% of procurement in Q1 2026. After posting losses in 2023 and 2024, the company's fortunes reversed sharply in Q1 2026. Revenue grew 77.4% year-over-year to RMB 224 million, with net profit reaching RMB 75.89 million. This dramatic turnaround was primarily driven by strategic inventory stockpiling and significant price increases for its core products, leading to a gross margin surge to 55.63%. However, this aggressive strategy carries major risks. Inventory days have risen significantly, and the company's operating cash flow turned negative in Q1 2026 due to high stockpiling costs. The memory industry's cyclical nature means the current price boom may not last. If a downturn arrives, Xintianxia's high-cost inventory could become a financial burden, a scenario that previously derailed its A-share listing ambitions. Further complicating its IPO journey are corporate governance concerns. The company paid substantial dividends during loss-making years, and several major shareholders, including state-backed funds and the founder, cashed out significant stakes shortly before the Hong Kong listing application. Chinese regulators have requested details on past equity transfers, questioning pricing fairness. In essence, Xintianxia's Hong Kong listing bid is a high-stakes gamble on the sustainability of the current chip price cycle. Its future hinges not just on favorable market conditions but on its ability to withstand the inevitable downturn and prove its long-term operational resilience.

marsbit8 min fa

Chipsea Turns from A-share to H-share: Riding the Price Surge Trend, or Gambling on the Cycle?

marsbit8 min fa

BlackRock Launches Stablecoin Reserve Fund BRSRV: Bringing Short-Term US Treasuries to Solana, Ethereum, and Tempo

BlackRock Launches Tokenized Stablecoin Reserve Fund BRSRV, Expands to Solana and Tempo Global asset management giant BlackRock has introduced BRSRV (BlackRock Daily Reinvestment Stablecoin Reserve Vehicle), a tokenized money market fund specifically designed for stablecoin reserves. Concurrently, the firm is issuing tokenized, on-chain shares of its existing BSTBL (BlackRock Select Treasury-Based Liquidity Fund). A key development is the expansion of supported blockchains beyond Ethereum to include Solana and Stripe-affiliated chain Tempo for recording share ownership. The transfer agent Securitize will manage the process through approved, whitelisted wallets requiring verified identity, with a minimum initial investment of $3 million. The fund will invest solely in cash, short-term U.S. Treasuries, and overnight repurchase agreements backed by U.S. government securities, explicitly avoiding any crypto assets. BlackRock states the structure aims to qualify as a compliant reserve asset under the U.S. GENIUS Act for payment stablecoins. This launch builds upon BlackRock's broader tokenization strategy, notably following its BUIDL fund introduced in March 2024, which now holds over $26 billion in assets. The move places BlackRock alongside other major institutions like Morgan Stanley and Fidelity in offering products tailored for the stablecoin reserve market, signaling a deepening institutional push into tokenized real-world assets (RWA) and on-chain finance infrastructure.

marsbit9 min fa

BlackRock Launches Stablecoin Reserve Fund BRSRV: Bringing Short-Term US Treasuries to Solana, Ethereum, and Tempo

marsbit9 min fa

Wall Street Morning Report: AI + Cloud Computing Takes Over the Market Again, Amazon Knocks on the Door of $3 Trillion

Wall Street's August began with a strong rally, driven by easing Middle East tensions as President Trump signaled progress on U.S.-Iran talks, prompting a sharp drop in oil prices. Major indices hit record or near-record highs, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 1.32%, the Nasdaq Composite surging 2.13%, and the S&P 500 rising 1.48%. The energy sector was the sole decliner. The AI and cloud computing narrative dominated the tech rally. The "Magnificent Seven" index jumped 3.6%. Amazon's market cap surpassed $3 trillion for the first time following robust AWS results, while Nvidia regained a $5 trillion valuation. Meta, Google, and Microsoft also posted significant gains. Other AI-related stocks like Palantir, CoreWeave, and various semiconductor and infrastructure companies saw strong advances. In other markets, gold held above $4,000, supported by central bank buying. Treasury yields fell as oil prices dropped. The U.S. dollar remained stable despite strong manufacturing data. Japan's substantial currency intervention raised concerns, but U.S. officials reassured markets about the mechanism used. Key events ahead include major industry conferences (Ai4 2026, FMS Summit) and earnings reports from companies like SpaceX, AMD, and Pfizer. The White House is also set to host a meeting with leading AI firms to discuss regulatory frameworks.

marsbit1 h fa

Wall Street Morning Report: AI + Cloud Computing Takes Over the Market Again, Amazon Knocks on the Door of $3 Trillion

marsbit1 h fa

The July Tech Stock Pullback: Which Funds Are Paying the Price for Buying High?

In July, China's technology stocks experienced a sharp correction, causing significant pain for actively managed mutual funds that aggressively increased their holdings in the sector during the second quarter. The sell-off saw major indices like the ChiNext and STAR 50 fall over 25% and 28% for the month, respectively. Funds that piled into tech at its June peak faced steep losses. Notably, several veteran "value investor" fund managers, known for long-term holdings in consumer staples, made dramatic shifts. Star managers like Zhang Kun (E Fund Blue Chip Selected) and Liu Yanchun (Invesco Great Wall Dingyi) drastically reduced positions in liquor stocks like Kweichow Moutai, switching instead to semiconductor and AI hardware companies like SMIC and Ingenic International. Data shows active equity funds' allocation to the electronics sector reached a historical high of 42.64% by end-Q2. Around 67 funds saw their TMT (Technology, Media, Telecom) weighting surge from an average of 6.75% to 54.99%. The consequences were severe in July: these high-TMT funds fell an average of over 20%, with 12 plunging more than 40%. Examples include Jinhua High-Quality Growth and Guoshou Anbao Wenhui, which fell 26.34% and nearly 40% respectively after raising TMT weights above 70%. The article also highlights issues of "style drift," where funds with names like "high-dividend" held high-P/E tech stocks instead, confusing investors. Newly launched funds suffered even more. For instance, Guotai Haitong New Energy RuiXuan Hybrid, launched in mid-June, saw its net asset value plummet to 0.5509 yuan by July 30, a loss of nearly 45%. Analysts note the extreme sector concentration mirrored past bubbles (e.g., 2021 new energy). The intense, crowded trade itself became a major risk. While tech stocks rebounded sharply on July 31, the funds that chased the high face a longer-term market test.

marsbit1 h fa

The July Tech Stock Pullback: Which Funds Are Paying the Price for Buying High?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片