Polygon – What should traders expect from its price after 25.9M POL burn?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-05

Introduzione

Polygon (POL) has burned 25.9 million tokens, aiming to reduce its circulating supply by approximately 3% by the end of 2026. Despite this deflationary effort, POL's price fell 6.46%, largely mirroring broader market trends rather than token-specific weakness. Trading volume also declined by 26%. However, network activity surged, with daily transactions reaching 6.6 million—a one-month high—suggesting growing demand. The project also saw significant capital inflows, with $7 million in net bridge inflows and consistent spot-market accumulation. Although POL recently broke a descending resistance line, a bearish pullback followed. The bullish outlook remains intact if the price holds above this key level.

Polygon [POL] is increasingly focused on strengthening its underlying fundamentals, with recent efforts centered on tightening token supply and reinforcing long-term value dynamics. One of these efforts involved burning 25.9 million POL to cut circulating supply by roughly 3% by year-end.

Despite these announcements though, investor reaction has remained muted. At the time of writing, POL’s price was down 6.46% – A move largely aligned with the broader market’s underperformance rather than token-specific weakness.

Trading activity cooled down too, with the volume falling by 26% to $108 million. This can be seen as evidence of reduced momentum and cautious positioning among traders.

POL tightens supply through token burn

Polygon has continued to refine its tokenomics framework, with the latest adjustment coming through a protocol-level token burn. The mechanism permanently removes tokens from circulation, reducing available supply in the market.

The intent is clear – Constrain supply while network usage expands, allowing demand to gradually exert upward pressure on price. While the impact is yet to reflect meaningfully on POL’s valuation, the structural shift since has been notable.

The latest burn removed approximately 0.24% of the circulating supply, equivalent to about 25.7 million POL. In a post on X, Polygon founder and CEO Sandeep Nailwal confirmed that additional burns are planned in the months ahead.

“If this continues, by the end of 2026, ~3% of POL will be burnt by the protocol.”

Nailwal also emphasized Polygon’s focus on value accrual, highlighting a direct link between network activity and token economics.

“POL’s value accrual is clearly defined—more usage on the PoS chain means more POL tokens get burnt. Simple.”

Network data seemed to support this narrative too. In fact, daily transactions on Polygon surged to 6.6 million in the last 24 hours – The highest level recorded in over a month.

Rising transaction counts suggest growing demand for blockspace, increasing POL usage per transaction. If sustained, this dynamic could gradually translate into stronger token performance.

Capital inflows reinforce the bullish case

Capital flow metrics further strengthened POL’s outlook. For example – Bridge Netflow data revealed that Polygon recorded $7 million in net inflows over the past day, ranking second among major chains behind only Base and Ethereum.

Bridge Netflow tracks liquidity moving between blockchains. A closer breakdown highlighted that more than 90% of these inflows originated from the Ethereum ecosystem, signaling sustained capital migration towards Polygon.

Elevated capital concentration on the network increases the likelihood of rotation into POL. Particularly as investors seek exposure aligned with on-chain activity.

Centralized exchanges have also seen steady accumulation. Spot traders have gradually increased their exposure to POL, with net inflows totaling $4.2 million over the past week.

A further $200,000 flowed in over the last 24 hours alone. Combined on-chain inflows and spot accumulation could provide meaningful price support once broader market conditions stabilize.

Breakout requires follow-through

On the daily charts, POL recently pushed above a descending resistance line that had suppressed price action for several weeks.

The breakout, recorded on Monday, pointed to a potential trend shift. Historically, reclaiming such a resistance often precedes higher highs when confirmed. However, Tuesday’s candlestick printed bearish, pulling the price lower instead of extending the upward move.

Despite the pullback, POL continues to trade above the former resistance level, keeping the bullish structure intact. As long as the price holds above this zone, the probability of a rebound will be elevated.

A sustained breakdown below it, however, would weaken the setup and delay any meaningful recovery.


Final Thoughts

  • Polygon has burned 25.9 million POL, part of a broader plan to cut circulating supply by year-end.
  • Capital inflows remain dominant on-chain, with steady spot-market accumulation reinforcing the trend.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to Polygon's announcement of burning 25.9 million POL tokens?

AThe immediate market reaction was muted. At the time of writing, POL's price was down 6.46%, a move largely aligned with the broader market's underperformance rather than token-specific weakness. Trading volume also fell by 26% to $108 million.

QWhat is the long-term goal of Polygon's token burn mechanism according to its founder?

AAccording to Polygon founder and CEO Sandeep Nailwal, the long-term goal is to burn approximately 3% of the total POL supply by the end of 2026. The mechanism is designed to constrain supply as network usage expands, allowing demand to exert upward pressure on the price.

QWhat on-chain metric suggests growing demand for the Polygon network?

ADaily transactions on the Polygon network surged to 6.6 million in the last 24 hours, which is the highest level recorded in over a month. This rising transaction count suggests growing demand for blockspace and increased POL usage per transaction.

QWhat does the Bridge Netflow data reveal about capital movement onto the Polygon chain?

ABridge Netflow data revealed that Polygon recorded $7 million in net inflows over the past day, ranking second among major chains behind only Base and Ethereum. Over 90% of these inflows originated from the Ethereum ecosystem, signaling sustained capital migration towards Polygon.

QWhat is the significance of POL's price breaking above the descending resistance line on the daily chart?

AThe breakout above the descending resistance line pointed to a potential trend shift, as historically, reclaiming such a resistance often precedes higher highs when confirmed. However, a bearish candlestick the following day caused a pullback. The bullish structure remains intact as long as the price holds above the former resistance level.

Letture associate

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit31 min fa

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit31 min fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手41 min fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手41 min fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit1 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit1 h fa

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手1 h fa

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare POL

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Polygon Ecosystem TokenPOL.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL)Dopo aver acquistato Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL)Scambia facilmente Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

227 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare POL

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di POL POL sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片