Polygon: After deflation and network adoption, can POL’s price reset in 2026?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-06

Introduzione

Polygon's POL token, despite minimal price gains in 2025's bull market, saw record-breaking network adoption with 1.4 billion annual transactions and daily transactions stabilizing above 5 million. CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlights a significant deflationary mechanism, with 1 million POL burned daily from fees—potentially burning 3.5% of the total supply annually. This, combined with high staking levels (3.6 billion POL staked), reduces inflation and increases scarcity, historically correlating with price increases. POL starting 2026 with a 21% price surge to $0.126 suggests potential for further growth, targeting $0.15 short-term, contingent on sustained momentum and deflationary pressure.

While the crypto market boomed in 2025 amid widespread adoption, Polygon recorded minimal to no gains on its price charts.

Even though POL underperformed, its network usage and adoption rate reached record-breaking levels.

As a result, Polygon’s CEO was left dreaming of a resurrective 2026, building on the gains realized so far.

Is 2026 really the year of Polygon’s resurrection?

According to Polygon’s CEO, Sandeep Nailwal, the network is currently on its S-curve, driven by fee generation.

Sandeep posited that the network has recorded a massive surge in fees, mostly spent on token burns. As such, 1 million POL tokens have been burned daily over the past 3-4 days through fees accrued on the network.

In fact, over the past three months, the network’s daily fees and revenue surged 425% to $115k, most of which was spent on burns.

As Sandeep observed, at this rate, if it continued for the whole year, 3.5% of POL’s total supply would be burned.

Such a burn rate introduces massive deflationary pressure on POL. Reduced inflation is key for POL’s future growth, as it accelerates upward movement.

Historically, there has been a direct correlation between higher scarcity and higher prices. For example, over the past six months, POL declined significantly when inflation rose, and has recovered in 2026 as inflation fell.

Additionally, 3.6 bln POL is staked, and stakers and validators earn a combined reward of 1.5% of POL. This also further elevates token scarcity.

Therefore, if the model holds for a sustained period, POL could benefit extensively in 2026.

Polygon hits a record 1.4 billion transactions in 2025

In addition to deflationary moves, Polygon usage and adoption have skyrocketed. According to official observation, Polygon reached a record 1.4 billion transactions in 2025, reflecting massive adoption.

In fact, daily transactions stabilized above 5 million, with occasional spikes to 7 million, while transaction volume stayed above 20 million.

Significantly, the growth in transactions was also backed by a growing user base.

Active addresses grew significantly, with weekly addresses stabilizing above 15 million while daily addresses hovered around 1 million and 700k.

Usually, when addresses and transactions rise in tandem, it signals increased network usage. Thus, more users are actively engaged with the network, pointing to actual demand for the asset.

Can POL claim a high 2026?

After trading in a descending channel through Q4 2024, POL kicked off 2026 on a positive note. In fact, the altcoin jumped 21% from $0.09 to $0.127 over the past week.

At press time, POL traded at $0.126, up 4.67% on the daily charts. This bullish outlook has carried over to the monthly charts after price cleared December losses.

As a result, the altcoin’s Stochastic Momentum Index moved from the negative zone to 84 at press time, indicating strong upward momentum.

With Polygon recording a significant adoption rate amid reduced scarcity, the sustainability of deflationary measures could set POL up for a positive run in 2026.

As of now, the altcoin faces significant long-term resistance at $0.17, according to the Future Trend Channel. To reach this level, POL must first target $0.15 in the short term.

However, a break in the current momentum will see the altcoin drop to $0.11, then attempt another leg up.


Final Thoughts

  • Polygon is set for a significant deflationary boost in 2026, with 1 million POL burned daily via generated fees, which could amount to 3.5% of the supply.
  • Polygon network usage recorded a significant milestone in 2025, hitting 1.4 billion transactions.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the daily POL token burn rate mentioned by Polygon's CEO, and what percentage of the total supply would be burned if this rate continued for a year?

A1 million POL tokens are burned daily, and if this rate continued for a whole year, it would burn 3.5% of the total supply.

QWhat two key metrics does the article cite as evidence of massive adoption and increased network usage on the Polygon network in 2025?

AThe article cites a record 1.4 billion total transactions in 2025 and daily transactions stabilizing above 5 million, alongside a growing user base with weekly active addresses above 15 million.

QAccording to the article, what is the direct historical correlation between POL's price and its inflation rate?

AHistorically, POL's price declined when inflation rose and recovered when inflation fell.

QWhat is the significant long-term resistance level for POL's price as mentioned in the article, and what is the short-term target it must first reach?

AThe significant long-term resistance level is $0.17, and POL must first target $0.15 in the short term.

QBesides token burns, what other mechanism is contributing to POL token scarcity?

AWith 3.6 billion POL staked, stakers and validators earn a combined reward of 1.5% of POL, which further elevates token scarcity.

Letture associate

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2 h fa

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片