Pi Network price prediction: $0.20 still in play as 3 signals align

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-03

Introduzione

In mid-February, AMBCrypto cautioned that Pi Network's (PI) 58.1% rally appeared to be buyer exhaustion rather than a bullish reversal. PI was rejected at the $0.20 supply zone and is currently trading at $0.171. Despite the pullback, prices held above the $0.13 local lows, and key indicators suggest limited selling pressure. The 20 and 50-day moving averages are nearing a bullish crossover, with the 20DMA acting as dynamic support. A triangle pattern on the H4 chart indicates an impending breakout. If Bitcoin surpasses and holds above $70k, PI could retest $0.20 and challenge the $0.216 high. The short-term outlook remains cautiously optimistic, contingent on broader market momentum.

In mid-February, AMBCrypto had warned that a Pi Network [PI] rally looked more like buyer exhaustion than a bullish reversal.

During that rally, PI had moved 58.1% higher in 4 days, on the back of high Spot Volume.

However, it ran into the $0.2 supply zone and was unable to overcome it. At the time of writing, PI was trading at $0.171.

The rejection from the overhead supply has come true, but what is likely to follow in March? An argument can be made for a bullish breakout and a long-term trend shift for PI, especially if Bitcoin can push past $70k.

The chances of a PI breakout past $0.2

The rejection from $0.2 did not send PI prices below the $0.13 local lows. Such a scenario would have been a clear signal of bearish intent.

Instead, the altcoin prices fell to $0.16 and rebounded.

At the same time, the OBV did not see a steep drop-off from the mid-February rally levels. This meant that selling pressure was not high. Additionally, the 20 and 50-day moving averages were on the verge of making a bullish crossover.

Over the past week, the 20DMA has served as a dynamic support to Pi Network token prices.

The lack of selling pressure and the challenge of the $0.173 level suggested a move higher could occur in the short-term.

Pi Network short-term price prediction

The H4 local resistance at $0.1788 would likely be a firm test of bullish resolve.

At the time of writing, the altcoin was approaching the apex of a triangle pattern (orange). The direction of the breakout from this chart pattern could determine the next impulse move.

It is possible that a Bitcoin [BTC] short squeeze could give the altcoin market some temporary respite. In this case, a PI move toward $0.2 and the $0.216 local high could materialize.


Final Summary

  • PI’s short-term direction hinged on the direction of the breakout from the triangle pattern.
  • The Pi Network price prediction is a move toward $0.20 and $0.216, provided Bitcoin can climb above $70k and maintain the momentum.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the main reason AMBCrypto warned that the Pi Network rally in mid-February might not be a bullish reversal?

AAMBCrypto warned that the rally looked more like buyer exhaustion than a bullish reversal.

QWhat key price level did Pi Network (PI) fail to overcome during its February rally?

API failed to overcome the $0.2 supply zone.

QWhat two technical indicators suggested a lack of significant selling pressure and a potential bullish crossover?

AThe On-Balance Volume (OBV) did not see a steep drop-off, and the 20 and 50-day moving averages were on the verge of a bullish crossover.

QWhat chart pattern's breakout direction is expected to determine Pi Network's next significant price move?

AThe direction of the breakout from the triangle pattern (orange) is expected to determine the next impulse move.

QAccording to the article, what two conditions could lead to a Pi Network price move toward $0.20 and $0.216?

AA move toward $0.20 and $0.216 could materialize if Bitcoin climbs above $70k and maintains its momentum, and if there is a Bitcoin short squeeze that gives the altcoin market respite.

Letture associate

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

On April 24, 2026, DeepSeek released V4, a Chinese large language model offering a free "million-token context window," enabling it to process vast amounts of data like entire books or years of corporate documents in one go. In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released around the same time, is more powerful but significantly more expensive, charging up to $180 per million output tokens. DeepSeek’s strategy represents a shift from a pure AI research firm to a heavy-infrastructure player, building data centers in Inner Mongolia’s Ulanqab to bypass U.S. chip export restrictions. This move, supported by Huawei’s Ascend chips and China’s cheap green electricity, highlights a fundamental divergence in AI development models: U.S. firms focus on high-cost, high-margin services, while Chinese players like DeepSeek prioritize accessibility and affordability. Facing intense talent poaching from tech giants, DeepSeek is seeking a $44 billion valuation funding round to retain researchers and scale infrastructure. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are compressing AI models to run on smartphones, making AI accessible offline and across the Global South. Through open-source models and localized solutions, Chinese AI is empowering non-English speakers and low-income users, driving a form of "digital equality." While Silicon Valley builds walled gardens, DeepSeek and others are turning AI into a public utility—like tap water—flowing freely to those previously left behind.

marsbit8 min fa

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

marsbit8 min fa

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbit1 h fa

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbit1 h fa

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

On April 24, the U.S. Department of Justice arrested U.S. Army Special Forces Staff Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke for insider trading related to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on January 3. Van Dyke allegedly profited over $400,000 by placing bets on a prediction market, Polymarket, using insider knowledge of the covert operation. According to the indictment, Van Dyke registered an account (0x31a5) on December 26 and made a series of bets predicting Maduro’s capture and U.S. military involvement in Venezuela. He withdrew most of his funds on the day of the operation and attempted to obscure his tracks by transferring assets through crypto and brokerage accounts. This case marks the first time the DOJ has prosecuted insider trading on Polymarket. PolyBeats had previously identified five suspicious accounts, including Van Dyke’s—the highest earner—in January. The other accounts, with profits ranging from $34,000 to $145,000, remain under unofficial scrutiny but have not been charged. Their lower profits, indirect access to information, and unclear legal boundaries may complicate prosecution. Polymarket has since strengthened its market integrity rules, explicitly prohibiting trading based on confidential or insider information. Van Dyke’s arrest, nearly four months after his trades, signals increased regulatory attention and the persistent traceability of blockchain-based transactions.

marsbit1 h fa

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片