Overseas Funds Accelerate Withdrawal, U.S. Bonds Face Largest Selling Pressure in Six Years

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-25

Introduzione

Overseas official investors are accelerating their withdrawal from U.S. Treasuries, with foreign official accounts at the New York Fed shedding $75 billion over the past four weeks—the largest monthly decline since the COVID-19 pandemic hit in March 2020. According to Deutsche Bank research, this implies net sales of approximately $60 billion, marking the most significant sell-off since the pandemic began. The sell-off is particularly concentrated in the mid-term segment of the yield curve, contributing to recent rapid yield rises. Unlike in March 2023, the drawdown was not offset by increased use of the Fed’s FIMA repo facility, indicating outright sales or non-reinvestment of maturing securities. The drop in custody holdings aligns with observed FX intervention by Asian central banks and a broader slowdown in foreign purchases of dollar assets. Historical correlation suggests custody data explains about 50% of the variation in official net flows reported in TIC data. Deutsche Bank warns that sustained foreign selling could erode the “convenience yield” advantage enjoyed by U.S. debt due to its reserve currency status. Estimates suggest the 10-year yield may be suppressed by 90–100 basis points due to dollar dominance. A continued retreat of foreign demand could push long-term yields significantly higher, increasing refinancing costs and affecting global financial conditions.

Author: Bu Shuqing

Source: Wall Street Insights

The U.S. bond market is facing potential selling pressure from overseas official investors, a development that has raised high alert in the market.

According to the Trading Desk, a research report released by Deutsche Bank on March 23 shows that the U.S. bond holdings of foreign official accounts custodied at the New York Fed plummeted by $75 billion over the past four weeks, marking the largest monthly decline since the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Based on historical data models, this change implies that foreign official investors actually net sold approximately $60 billion in U.S. bonds, also the largest since the pandemic.

This data aligns with the recent sharp rise in U.S. bond yields, particularly the abnormal upward movement in mid-term (belly) yields—a segment where foreign official investors' holdings are concentrated. Deutsche Bank warns that if overseas demand continues to shrink, the "convenience yield" advantage of U.S. bonds will be eroded, posing a substantive upside risk to long-term yields.

Custody Data Reveals Selling Signals

The most authoritative data source for tracking the movements of foreign official investors in U.S. bonds is the U.S. Treasury's TIC (International Capital Flows) report, but this data has significant lag—the March data will not be available until mid-May at the earliest.

As an alternative indicator, the New York Fed's weekly H.4.1 report includes a memorandum entry recording the face value of securities custodied for foreign official and international accounts, with a lag of only one day. Deutsche Bank strategists Matthew Raskin, Steven Zeng, and Andrew Fu noted in the report that the latest H.4.1 data shows, based on weekly averages, that the U.S. bond holdings of foreign official custodied accounts fell by $75 billion over the past four weeks, not only the largest decline since March 2020 but also the second-largest single-week drop in the past decade.

Notably, unlike a similar situation in March 2023, the scale of FIMA repo operations did not rise simultaneously this time, indicating that this round of reduction was due to direct sales or non-renewal at maturity, rather than liquidity financing through repo operations with the Fed. Foreign reverse repos, foreign official deposits, and FIMA securities lending also showed little change over the past month.

High Correlation Between Custody Data and TIC Data

To what extent can custody holding data represent the overall changes in U.S. bond holdings by foreign official investors? Deutsche Bank conducted a systematic verification.

The report shows that over the past 15 years, the correlation between changes in custody holdings and the net purchases by foreign officials in TIC data has been significant, with the former explaining about 50% of the latter's changes. Even when shortening the sample to post-2019 to eliminate potential interference from changes in reserve management models, this relationship remains robust.

Based on this historical relationship, a $75 billion decline in custody holdings corresponds to a net sale of approximately $60 billion by foreign official investors. Deutsche Bank pointed out that this would be the largest net sale by foreign official accounts since the COVID-19 pandemic; to find a comparable case, one would need to go back to December 2018.

Shift in Capital Flows Amid Foreign Exchange Intervention

The decline in U.S. bond custody holdings is highly consistent with recent market dynamics observed by Deutsche Bank's foreign exchange strategy team.

According to a previous report by Deutsche Bank's foreign exchange strategy team, despite the outbreak of the Iran war and soaring oil prices, the U.S. dollar failed to strengthen as expected, partly due to large-scale foreign exchange interventions by several Asian central banks. Meanwhile, the team's high-frequency ETF monitoring data also showed a significant slowdown in foreign investors' purchases of U.S. dollar assets.

The combination of these two clues leads to a conclusion: foreign official investors are reducing their allocation to U.S. dollar assets, and the sale of U.S. bonds is a direct manifestation of this trend.

Sustained Selling Could Push Long-Term Yields Up by Over 100 Basis Points

Deutsche Bank's analysis reveals a structural concern: U.S. bond yields have long benefited from the "convenience yield" brought by the U.S. dollar's reserve currency status, and this advantage is now being tested.

The report cites previous Deutsche Bank research, indicating that the current 10-year U.S. bond yield is more than 100 basis points lower than the reasonable level implied by the U.S. net international investment position (NIIP). Another recent academic working paper estimated that the U.S. dollar's reserve currency status keeps long-term U.S. interest rates about 90 basis points lower than "normal levels."

Deutsche Bank warns that if foreign demand continues to decline, this convenience yield will face regression pressure, and the term premium and overall yield of U.S. bonds will have substantive upside space, posing a direct impact on investors holding U.S. bonds.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat does the sharp decline in foreign official holdings of U.S. Treasuries at the New York Fed indicate, according to Deutsche Bank's report?

AIt indicates that foreign official investors have been net selling approximately $60 billion in U.S. Treasuries over the past four weeks, marking the largest net selling since the COVID-19 pandemic began.

QHow does the recent movement in U.S. Treasury yields, particularly in the belly of the curve, relate to the actions of foreign official investors?

AThe abnormal rise in mid-term (belly) Treasury yields is corroborated by the sell-off, as foreign official investors' holdings are concentrated in that specific maturity segment.

QWhy is the H.4.1 report from the New York Fed used as a proxy for tracking foreign official investor activity, and what is its key advantage?

AThe H.4.1 report is used because the official TIC (Treasury International Capital) data has a significant publication lag. The key advantage of the H.4.1 data is that it is updated weekly with only a one-day lag.

QWhat two key market dynamics observed by Deutsche Bank's FX strategy team point towards foreign official investors reducing their dollar asset allocations?

AThe two dynamics are: 1) Large-scale FX interventions by several Asian central banks, which prevented the dollar from strengthening as expected, and 2) A noticeable slowdown in foreign investors' purchases of U.S. dollar assets, as shown by high-frequency ETF flow data.

QWhat is the 'convenience yield' of U.S. Treasuries, and what is the potential impact if foreign demand continues to decline?

AThe 'convenience yield' is the advantage U.S. Treasuries enjoy due to the dollar's reserve currency status, which has been estimated to suppress long-term yields by over 100 basis points. If foreign demand declines persistently, this premium could erode, leading to a substantial rise in term premiums and overall yields.

Letture associate

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit7 min fa

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit7 min fa

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit7 min fa

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit7 min fa

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit18 min fa

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit18 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片