Outsmarting Algorithmic Manipulation on Twitter: How to Grow Your Account with Dignity?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-19

Introduzione

This article analyzes the significant decline in engagement and reach experienced by many Twitter (X) content creators, attributing it to two major platform changes. First, the platform has weakened the "Following" tab, defaulting users to the algorithmic "For You" feed. Second, it has shifted from a chronological timeline to algorithmically recommended content, heavily influenced by its AI model, Grok. This results in a polarized content performance: deep, analytical posts receive minimal views and zero interaction, while sensationalist, controversial, or low-quality content (e.g., clickbait, politics, or adult material) often goes viral. The author argues this strategy, designed to increase ad revenue by keeping users in a recommendation loop, ultimately degrades the platform's community and commercial value. It incentivizes "farming" engagement through divisive or shallow content, driving away high-quality vertical creators who are increasingly migrating to platforms like Substack. The piece concludes with a three-part strategy for creators: 1) adapt by mixing deep content with high-engagement hooks and subscribing to Premium for better reach, 2) build direct audience connections through newsletters or private groups, and 3) wait for potential platform improvements. The core message is a call to maintain integrity while navigating the algorithmic challenges.

If you are a Twitter blogger, you have been experiencing abnormal phenomena for nearly half a year.

Specifically, your traffic and interaction data suddenly plummeted at a certain point, and the nature of viral content has become strange—deep analyses get dozens of views with zero interaction, while posting provocative or sensational content leads to a surge in followers.

The main content of this article is about why this phenomenon occurs. In other words, how did the clever design of the X platform ruin the vertical audience you worked so hard to build?

Platform Weakens the Following Page, Defaults to the Recommendation Page

This is caused by two measures from the platform:

· Weakening the "Following" page and defaulting users to the "For You" recommendation page; this has become so severe that some bloggers have to write custom scripts to force a switch back to the Following page.

· Phasing out the chronological display of followers' content in favor of algorithmic recommendations.

The reason is that last year, the platform introduced Grok as a weighting factor in algorithmic judgments. Without delving into the complexities, the result is: This makes posts either completely silent or suddenly blessed by the algorithm, going viral with no middle ground.

The motivation behind this is easy to understand: if users only see content from accounts they follow, platform ad insertion would be very awkward. For example, it would have to insert ads abruptly, like on WeChat, and then fabricate comments and likes from friends below the ad.

This seems to enhance the platform's commercial value in the short term, but in practice, it doesn't work out that way, especially in the casino-like atmosphere of the crypto circle.

@supermao has an incisive discussion on this in an article: Everyone says CT content is declining? What is the root cause? Have you been to Las Vegas? Have you seen high rollers in casinos needing to read newspapers or books? What they need are presidential suites, luxury, and beautiful women. The crypto circle is essentially too heavily narrative-driven around gambling, with everything revolving around gains, losses, and bets. More and more smart people realize that if your entire life is tied directly to market trends, it's hard to maintain long-term physical and mental health and clear thinking.

The result of these two measures is that a large amount of paid promotional content, such as AI-spun articles, suggestive images, borderline content, and political sensationalism, dominates users' recommended timeline. Rogue matrix accounts have become mainstream.

You probably understand how algorithms work better than I do: the more users click on this type of content, the system automatically judges it as your interest, and you get more of it. Eventually, the recommendation feed is full of this stuff.

The Destruction of Deep Content

The result: Many niche bloggers find their tweet traffic incredibly strange. They spend a long time writing deep content that gets dozens of views and zero interaction, but posting a sexy picture or some anti-social rant suddenly gains them hundreds of followers.

In reality, the attention channel for their vertical content distribution has been hijacked by the recommendation mechanism. Their followers haven't seen what they've been posting for a long time.

The following image depicts a common scenario:

In the end, vertical bloggers are forced to post content that pleases the base audience to survive, or else they should leave the platform and find a new one.

This leads to a massive loss of high-quality creators. Social platforms rely heavily on atmosphere. Weibo, Zhihu, and Bilibili have at times turned into public toilets, filled with misogyny, misandry, political sensationalism, and various anti-social, hostile content, all stemming from a loss of control over community atmosphere. After all, content that creates conflict and suggestive images are the most attention-grabbing. While this increases interaction in the short term, it leads to a dual loss of quality content and commercial value in the long run.

Many bloggers, like @nic_carter and @notboringco, are gradually moving towards Substack.

Rebuilding Your Influence with a Network Value Strategy

All week, Dan Koe's "One Day to Reset" long-form article became a viral hit.

This article had over 150 million reads. For a non-celebrity, non-president, non-billionaire to have traffic at this level, it must be officially boosted. Elon Musk's retweet and the million-dollar new concept essay contest are telling, and it also somewhat supports Nikita Bier's product-driven growth strategy.

I wrote about his thinking in a profile of Nikita Bier. It essentially revolves around one point: network value.

· Increase interaction between nodes in the network—content that stirs controversy, recommendation feeds.

· What kind of content increases network value?—Deep articles, preferably professional鸡汤 (chicken soup for the soul with expertise).

· Increased network value—Subscriptions + ad revenue up.

Increasing network value is necessary. Although major advertisers like Apple and Disney have returned, and subscription numbers have grown, Twitter still reported a net loss of $577 million in the third quarter of last year. This effort needs to be intensified.

Thinking about it this way, our action guide can be divided into three parts:

1. If you can't beat them, join them:

· First, buy a Premium subscription. You need the article writing function, right? Traffic now revolves around Blue V checks. At the very least, it allows paid promotions to reach more users.

· Wait for the algorithm's blessing. Mix deep articles with high-engagement hooks (like questions, hot takes).

2. Customized Service: Once traffic comes, build WeChat/Twitter/Telegram small groups or a Newsletter to ensure point-to-point reach. I have already developed the habit of reading deep content in my email.

3. Wait: Do nothing, just keep posting content diligently. I have a feeling that @nikitabier will probably start solving this problem soon.

I can't write any further here. In short, it's that slogan:

Let's grow our accounts with dignity!

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two main platform changes that have led to a decline in traffic for vertical content creators on X (Twitter)?

AThe two main changes are: 1. The weakening of the 'Following' tab, with users being defaulted to the 'For You' recommendation page. 2. The shift away from a chronological feed of followed accounts toward an algorithm-driven recommendation system.

QAccording to the article, what type of content tends to go viral under the new algorithm, and what type suffers?

AContent featuring clickbait, sensationalism, borderline (risqué) material, and politically charged hot takes tends to go viral and gain followers. In contrast, deep, analytical, and vertical-specific content suffers, often receiving few views and zero interaction.

QWhat is the stated business motive for the platform (X) implementing these algorithmic changes?

AThe primary business reason is to better integrate and monetize advertising. If users only see content from accounts they follow, inserting ads is more abrupt and less native. The algorithmic feed allows for smoother ad integration and increases the potential for ads to go viral, thereby boosting the platform's commercial value.

QWhat long-term negative consequence for the platform's health does the article predict due to these changes?

AThe article predicts a mass exodus of high-quality, vertical content creators. This will lead to a degradation of the community atmosphere, filling it with more divisive, sensational, and low-quality content. While this may boost short-term engagement, it will cause a long-term loss of both quality content and commercial value.

QWhat are the three suggested strategies for creators to 'stand up and grow their account' despite the algorithm?

AThe three suggested strategies are: 1. 'If you can't beat them, join them': Subscribe to X Premium for better reach, and mix deep content with high-engagement hooks (like questions or hot takes) to attract the algorithm's favor. 2. 'Customized Service': Direct traffic to private channels like WeChat groups, Telegram groups, or a Newsletter to ensure direct reach to an audience. 3. 'Wait': Do nothing but continue posting quality content, with the hope that the platform will eventually address the issue.

Letture associate

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报4 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报4 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News21 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News21 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit49 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit49 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片