Outsmarting Algorithmic Manipulation on Twitter: How to Grow Your Account with Dignity?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-19

Introduzione

This article analyzes the significant decline in engagement and reach experienced by many Twitter (X) content creators, attributing it to two major platform changes. First, the platform has weakened the "Following" tab, defaulting users to the algorithmic "For You" feed. Second, it has shifted from a chronological timeline to algorithmically recommended content, heavily influenced by its AI model, Grok. This results in a polarized content performance: deep, analytical posts receive minimal views and zero interaction, while sensationalist, controversial, or low-quality content (e.g., clickbait, politics, or adult material) often goes viral. The author argues this strategy, designed to increase ad revenue by keeping users in a recommendation loop, ultimately degrades the platform's community and commercial value. It incentivizes "farming" engagement through divisive or shallow content, driving away high-quality vertical creators who are increasingly migrating to platforms like Substack. The piece concludes with a three-part strategy for creators: 1) adapt by mixing deep content with high-engagement hooks and subscribing to Premium for better reach, 2) build direct audience connections through newsletters or private groups, and 3) wait for potential platform improvements. The core message is a call to maintain integrity while navigating the algorithmic challenges.

If you are a Twitter blogger, you have been experiencing abnormal phenomena for nearly half a year.

Specifically, your traffic and interaction data suddenly plummeted at a certain point, and the nature of viral content has become strange—deep analyses get dozens of views with zero interaction, while posting provocative or sensational content leads to a surge in followers.

The main content of this article is about why this phenomenon occurs. In other words, how did the clever design of the X platform ruin the vertical audience you worked so hard to build?

Platform Weakens the Following Page, Defaults to the Recommendation Page

This is caused by two measures from the platform:

· Weakening the "Following" page and defaulting users to the "For You" recommendation page; this has become so severe that some bloggers have to write custom scripts to force a switch back to the Following page.

· Phasing out the chronological display of followers' content in favor of algorithmic recommendations.

The reason is that last year, the platform introduced Grok as a weighting factor in algorithmic judgments. Without delving into the complexities, the result is: This makes posts either completely silent or suddenly blessed by the algorithm, going viral with no middle ground.

The motivation behind this is easy to understand: if users only see content from accounts they follow, platform ad insertion would be very awkward. For example, it would have to insert ads abruptly, like on WeChat, and then fabricate comments and likes from friends below the ad.

This seems to enhance the platform's commercial value in the short term, but in practice, it doesn't work out that way, especially in the casino-like atmosphere of the crypto circle.

@supermao has an incisive discussion on this in an article: Everyone says CT content is declining? What is the root cause? Have you been to Las Vegas? Have you seen high rollers in casinos needing to read newspapers or books? What they need are presidential suites, luxury, and beautiful women. The crypto circle is essentially too heavily narrative-driven around gambling, with everything revolving around gains, losses, and bets. More and more smart people realize that if your entire life is tied directly to market trends, it's hard to maintain long-term physical and mental health and clear thinking.

The result of these two measures is that a large amount of paid promotional content, such as AI-spun articles, suggestive images, borderline content, and political sensationalism, dominates users' recommended timeline. Rogue matrix accounts have become mainstream.

You probably understand how algorithms work better than I do: the more users click on this type of content, the system automatically judges it as your interest, and you get more of it. Eventually, the recommendation feed is full of this stuff.

The Destruction of Deep Content

The result: Many niche bloggers find their tweet traffic incredibly strange. They spend a long time writing deep content that gets dozens of views and zero interaction, but posting a sexy picture or some anti-social rant suddenly gains them hundreds of followers.

In reality, the attention channel for their vertical content distribution has been hijacked by the recommendation mechanism. Their followers haven't seen what they've been posting for a long time.

The following image depicts a common scenario:

In the end, vertical bloggers are forced to post content that pleases the base audience to survive, or else they should leave the platform and find a new one.

This leads to a massive loss of high-quality creators. Social platforms rely heavily on atmosphere. Weibo, Zhihu, and Bilibili have at times turned into public toilets, filled with misogyny, misandry, political sensationalism, and various anti-social, hostile content, all stemming from a loss of control over community atmosphere. After all, content that creates conflict and suggestive images are the most attention-grabbing. While this increases interaction in the short term, it leads to a dual loss of quality content and commercial value in the long run.

Many bloggers, like @nic_carter and @notboringco, are gradually moving towards Substack.

Rebuilding Your Influence with a Network Value Strategy

All week, Dan Koe's "One Day to Reset" long-form article became a viral hit.

This article had over 150 million reads. For a non-celebrity, non-president, non-billionaire to have traffic at this level, it must be officially boosted. Elon Musk's retweet and the million-dollar new concept essay contest are telling, and it also somewhat supports Nikita Bier's product-driven growth strategy.

I wrote about his thinking in a profile of Nikita Bier. It essentially revolves around one point: network value.

· Increase interaction between nodes in the network—content that stirs controversy, recommendation feeds.

· What kind of content increases network value?—Deep articles, preferably professional鸡汤 (chicken soup for the soul with expertise).

· Increased network value—Subscriptions + ad revenue up.

Increasing network value is necessary. Although major advertisers like Apple and Disney have returned, and subscription numbers have grown, Twitter still reported a net loss of $577 million in the third quarter of last year. This effort needs to be intensified.

Thinking about it this way, our action guide can be divided into three parts:

1. If you can't beat them, join them:

· First, buy a Premium subscription. You need the article writing function, right? Traffic now revolves around Blue V checks. At the very least, it allows paid promotions to reach more users.

· Wait for the algorithm's blessing. Mix deep articles with high-engagement hooks (like questions, hot takes).

2. Customized Service: Once traffic comes, build WeChat/Twitter/Telegram small groups or a Newsletter to ensure point-to-point reach. I have already developed the habit of reading deep content in my email.

3. Wait: Do nothing, just keep posting content diligently. I have a feeling that @nikitabier will probably start solving this problem soon.

I can't write any further here. In short, it's that slogan:

Let's grow our accounts with dignity!

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two main platform changes that have led to a decline in traffic for vertical content creators on X (Twitter)?

AThe two main changes are: 1. The weakening of the 'Following' tab, with users being defaulted to the 'For You' recommendation page. 2. The shift away from a chronological feed of followed accounts toward an algorithm-driven recommendation system.

QAccording to the article, what type of content tends to go viral under the new algorithm, and what type suffers?

AContent featuring clickbait, sensationalism, borderline (risqué) material, and politically charged hot takes tends to go viral and gain followers. In contrast, deep, analytical, and vertical-specific content suffers, often receiving few views and zero interaction.

QWhat is the stated business motive for the platform (X) implementing these algorithmic changes?

AThe primary business reason is to better integrate and monetize advertising. If users only see content from accounts they follow, inserting ads is more abrupt and less native. The algorithmic feed allows for smoother ad integration and increases the potential for ads to go viral, thereby boosting the platform's commercial value.

QWhat long-term negative consequence for the platform's health does the article predict due to these changes?

AThe article predicts a mass exodus of high-quality, vertical content creators. This will lead to a degradation of the community atmosphere, filling it with more divisive, sensational, and low-quality content. While this may boost short-term engagement, it will cause a long-term loss of both quality content and commercial value.

QWhat are the three suggested strategies for creators to 'stand up and grow their account' despite the algorithm?

AThe three suggested strategies are: 1. 'If you can't beat them, join them': Subscribe to X Premium for better reach, and mix deep content with high-engagement hooks (like questions or hot takes) to attract the algorithm's favor. 2. 'Customized Service': Direct traffic to private channels like WeChat groups, Telegram groups, or a Newsletter to ensure direct reach to an audience. 3. 'Wait': Do nothing but continue posting quality content, with the hope that the platform will eventually address the issue.

Letture associate

Critical Moments in Bitcoin: Cost Zones That Demand Attention Have Been Identified!

Analytics firm Glassnode reported that reduced expectations for U.S. interest rate cuts, along with pricing in possible rate hikes, have suppressed risk appetite in the cryptocurrency market. The Fed's interest rate decisions are crucial for market direction. U.S. Treasury yields have surpassed returns from crypto carry trades, leading investors to favor cash and low-risk interest-bearing instruments over crypto assets. A strong U.S. dollar further weakens marginal demand for crypto. Bitcoin is currently trading below its most intensive cost basis level, with approximately $69,000 identified as the breakeven zone and significant resistance for short-term investors. For a stronger recovery, Bitcoin needs to reclaim the $69,000 threshold with increased trading volume. Renewed active demand for spot Bitcoin ETFs is also deemed critical. According to Glassnode, the current Bitcoin decline represents the shallowest bear market in terms of price drawdown depth to date. However, based on previous cycle durations, this downturn may not be over yet. Spot trading volumes have fallen to multi-year lows, and sell-side order books have thinned, though many buy orders are placed significantly below current prices. Glassnode's risk indicator, Vector, signaled "risk off," suggesting a capital preservation mindset. The current market structure is being driven more by macroeconomic factors like monetary policy, bond yields, and dollar strength than by crypto-sector developments. Losing Bitcoin's support range of $62,000-$68,000, coupled with renewed exchange inflows, could negate the recovery scenario. Conversely, more favorable monetary policy, increased trading volume, a Bitcoin recovery above $69,000, and a resumption of spot ETF buying could signal a market turnaround.

cryptonews.ru24 min fa

Critical Moments in Bitcoin: Cost Zones That Demand Attention Have Been Identified!

cryptonews.ru24 min fa

Breaking News: Full Detailed Rationale and Explanation of the Fed's Interest Rate Decision Released!

As expected, the Federal Reserve kept its key interest rate unchanged at 3.50-3.75 percent, marking the fifth consecutive meeting without a rate change. The Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) decision passed with a 9-3 majority vote. Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, and Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan dissented, voting in favor of a 25 basis point rate hike. This was the first meeting since 2016 where three regional Fed presidents voted against holding rates steady, signaling growing influence among members advocating for tighter monetary policy to combat inflation. The Fed's statement noted that economic activity has been expanding at a solid pace despite high uncertainty, partly due to Middle East conflicts. It highlighted that growth in productivity and investment remained strong, employment gains have aligned with labor force growth, and the unemployment rate has remained relatively stable. The Fed also committed to maintaining ample reserves in the banking system. The statement emphasized that inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. It noted that supply shocks, including in the energy sector, are adding to inflationary pressures. The Committee stated it will continue to closely monitor incoming data and risks in pursuit of its price stability goal. The dissenting members argued that the target range for the federal funds rate should have been increased by 25 basis points.

cryptonews.ru44 min fa

Breaking News: Full Detailed Rationale and Explanation of the Fed's Interest Rate Decision Released!

cryptonews.ru44 min fa

The Fed's Interest Rate Decision is Inevitable! Former Senior Fed Advisor Reveals His Forecast for Today!

Former Federal Reserve senior advisor John Faust stated he does not expect the Fed to raise interest rates at the FOMC meeting concluding today. He argued the Fed will not try to win credibility by deliberately surprising markets. In his assessment, Faust noted that Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh has used strong rhetoric on restoring price stability but largely failed to share details on how he plans to achieve it. This information gap has led to various market scenarios. However, Faust believes the reality is simpler: Warsh positions himself as a pragmatic, tough-minded policymaker, placing high importance on monetary policy communication while showing flexibility regarding balance sheet reduction. Faust compared Warsh's approach to the "refined intuitive approach" used by former Chairman Alan Greenspan. Faust stated that, unlike strict policy rules, this approach does not yield clear-cut answers on rate decisions. In current conditions, both a 25-basis-point hike and waiting for the next meeting could be reasonably justified. Aligning with market expectations, Faust predicts the Fed will choose to wait today. He believes the benefit of waiting outweighs the negatives, partly because he agrees that deliberately surprising markets to boost credibility is not a valid factor. Faust also argued there is no substantial macroeconomic difference between hiking today and holding steady, as a 25-basis-point move over eight weeks alone is not economically decisive. He emphasized that the important aspect will not be the decision itself, but how it is explained to markets. Warsh has so far advocated forward-looking policy without clear guidance on economic forecasts or the likely rate path. Faust warned that if the Fed does not explicitly state grounds for a hike and opts to wait for more data, markets may misinterpret the decision's meaning. Regardless of today's outcome, how Warsh explains the policy decisions at the meeting and press conference may be the most critical information for investors.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

The Fed's Interest Rate Decision is Inevitable! Former Senior Fed Advisor Reveals His Forecast for Today!

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片