Orbs Enables Institutional-Grade Onchain Perpetual Futures on Sei via Gryps Integration

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-27

Introduzione

Orbs has enabled institutional-grade onchain perpetual futures trading on the Sei Network through Gryps' integration of Orbs’ Perpetual Hub Ultra. This integration provides a fully managed, professional perpetuals stack that enhances execution certainty, capital efficiency, and deterministic risk management. Perpetual Hub Ultra delivers a modular infrastructure covering hedging, liquidation, oracles, and trading interfaces. Leveraging Orbs’ Layer-3 technology and Symmio’s smart contracts, Gryps can aggregate deep liquidity, offer variable leverage, and ensure efficient execution without building complex backend systems. Designed specifically for perpetual futures, Gryps uses intent-based execution to maximize performance even in volatile markets. Orbs' Ran Hammer emphasized that this deployment meets the operational needs of professional traders with a turnkey solution prioritizing execution quality and predictable risk. The integration strengthens Orbs' position as an industry standard for onchain perps infrastructure, enabling decentralized platforms to compete with centralized exchanges on performance and user experience. Gryps is a high-performance, non-custodial perpetual futures protocol built on Sei for institutional traders.

Orbs announced today that institutional-grade onchain perpetual futures trading on Sei Network is now possible thanks to Gryps’ integration of Orbs’ Perpetual Hub Ultra. It increases access to sophisticated derivatives infrastructure intended for execution certainty, capital efficiency, and deterministic risk management by providing Sei with a fully managed, professional perpetuals stack.

The whole perpetual futures stack—including hedging, liquidation, oracles, and professional trading interfaces—is delivered by Perpetual Hub Ultra, a modular, capital-efficient perpetual futures infrastructure. Gryps can aggregate deep liquidity, offer variable leverage factors, and provide effective execution without developing complicated backend infrastructure thanks to the integration, which is powered by Orbs’ Layer-3 infrastructure and Symmio’s smart contract system.

Gryps is not a general-purpose DeFi application, but rather a professional trading infrastructure created specifically for perpetual futures. The integration maximizes capital efficiency and execution assurance even in unpredictable market situations by giving Gryps users access to intent-based execution managed by Orbs’ infrastructure.

“This demonstrates how advanced onchain derivatives infrastructure can be deployed in a way that meets the operational requirements of professional traders,” said Ran Hammer, Chief Business Officer at Orbs. “By integrating Perpetual Hub Ultra, Gryps is able to deliver institutional-grade perpetuals trading on Sei using a modular, turnkey stack that prioritizes execution quality and predictable risk.”

Perpetual Hub Ultra expands upon previous Perpetual Hub implementations that are now operational across several decentralized trading platforms. By allowing platforms to route liquidity from both onchain and offchain sources, including significant centralized exchanges, while preserving decentralized settlement and execution, the Ultra version expands these possibilities.

Perpetual Hub Ultra applies the same paradigm to perpetual futures while intent-based trading continues to rule spot markets. By allowing decentralized venues to compete with centralized exchanges on performance and user experience while being entirely onchain, the Gryps deployment further solidifies Orbs as the industry standard for turnkey perps infrastructure.

Built on the Sei Network, Gryps is a high-performance perpetual futures trading protocol designed for institutional and professional market players. With a modular, RFQ-based architecture and non-custodial settlement, the protocol prioritizes execution quality, capital efficiency, and deterministic risk management. The specialized derivatives infrastructure known as Gryps is built with scalability, dependability, and predictable execution in mind. Visit https://x.com/gryps_finance to find out more.

A decentralized Layer 3 blockchain Orbs was created for sophisticated on-chain trading. Orbs functions as an additional execution layer using a Proof of Stake consensus, enabling sophisticated logic and scripts that are not possible with conventional smart contracts. Protocols powered by orbs, such as dLIMIT, dTWAP, Liquidity Hub, and Perpetual Hub, enable decentralized markets to operate at CeFi level. With a multinational workforce spread over multiple locations, Orbs is pushing the boundaries of blockchain technology. Visit www.orbs.com to learn more.

TagsAltcoinBlockchain

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main announcement made by Orbs regarding the Sei Network?

AOrbs announced that institutional-grade onchain perpetual futures trading on Sei Network is now possible through Gryps' integration of Orbs' Perpetual Hub Ultra.

QWhat key benefits does the Perpetual Hub Ultra integration provide to Gryps on Sei?

AIt provides execution certainty, capital efficiency, deterministic risk management, and access to sophisticated derivatives infrastructure, including hedging, liquidation, oracles, and professional trading interfaces.

QHow does the integration leverage Orbs' technology infrastructure?

AThe integration is powered by Orbs' Layer-3 infrastructure and Symmio's smart contract system, enabling Gryps to aggregate deep liquidity, offer variable leverage, and provide effective execution without building complex backend infrastructure.

QWhat makes Gryps different from a general-purpose DeFi application?

AGryps is not a general-purpose DeFi application but a professional trading infrastructure specifically created for perpetual futures, prioritizing execution quality, capital efficiency, and deterministic risk management.

QHow does Perpetual Hub Ultra help decentralized venues compete with centralized exchanges?

AIt allows decentralized venues to route liquidity from both onchain and offchain sources, including major exchanges, while maintaining decentralized settlement and execution, thereby competing on performance and user experience while being entirely onchain.

Letture associate

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit11 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit11 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手23 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手23 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit38 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit38 min fa

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手41 min fa

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手41 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare SEI

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Sei Network (SEI) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Sei NetworkSEI.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Sei Network (SEI)Dopo aver acquistato Sei Network (SEI), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Sei Network (SEI)Scambia facilmente Sei Network (SEI) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

134 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare SEI

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di SEI SEI sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片