Optimism down 22% as Base drifts from OP Stack: Is more decline coming?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-20

Introduzione

Optimism (OP) plummeted 22% in 24 hours, significantly underperforming the broader market's 2% decline. The primary catalyst was Base's announcement to move away from the OP Stack, which is expected to substantially reduce transaction activity and revenue for Optimism. This fundamental shift triggered a massive sell-off, with sell volume surging 157% to $187 million and over $7.5 million in capital leaving exchanges. Market structure analysis indicates a strong bearish trend, with OP breaking to new lows and showing no signs of revisiting previous support levels. The invalidation of a prior bullish pattern and a resurgence in seller momentum suggest further decline is likely, potentially pushing the price below $0.10. A recovery is only considered possible if OP can reclaim the $0.20 resistance level as support, which currently seems unlikely.

Optimism [OP] is 97% from its all-time high of $4.85, and data shows that more losses could be on the way. The altcoin dropped by more than 23% in the past 24 hours, while the market was down by 2%.

The main driver of the drop was a fundamental change in its network as an Ethereum [ETH] layer 2 (L2) solution. The technical breakdown also played a key role in this price crash during the day.

Why is Optimism down today?

Soon after Base announced they would be moving from the OP Stack, it accelerated the declining price action of Optimism. The move looked to consolidate all its network operations on the Base chain to accelerate scaling.

The change meant that Optimism was losing a big chunk of transaction activity with revenue as the biggest stake. Base was the main contributor to the revenue of OP Stack; hence, this meant the impact could be huge.

Additionally, the sell volume spiked by more than 157%, per CoinMarketCap. About $187 million was pushing the price down, and it was the biggest volume in February for OP.

Moreover, Optimism Futures Flows showed that more than $7.5 million in capital left the exchange.

It represented a loss of 19% in only 12 hours while spot traders deposited $14.73 million into the exchange, probably for selling.

Still, there were spot traders who were buying OP and withdrawing from the exchange, and it accounted for $13.29 million. The net flow for Spot trades was $1.45 million OP.

Moreover, the decline accelerated as $1.28 million in longs were liquidated in just 24 hours, compared to only $80K in shorts. Will the price action of OP continue declining?

Is OP set for more decline?

Looking at the price action of OP, the altcoin has been falling freely since the start of the year. The drop came after the price invalidated an inverted heads-and-shoulders pattern that had faked out a bullish breakout.

The decline in the past 24 hours extended this year’s losses to about 60%. The Bull Bear Power (BBP), whose selling had cooled off, was now showing growth in its bars. This indicates a resurgence of seller momentum.

According to the analysis, OP was breaking the market structure each time by making new lows. Notably, its price was not revisiting the order block (OB) levels that initiated these breaks.

This indicator signaled a strong bear trend, suggesting more decline was coming, potentially even below $0.10.

However, a resurgence back above the $0.20 resistance level as support could shift the price direction. But the invalidation of the reversal pattern meant that bullish sentiment was not likely, at least for now.


Final Thoughts

  • Optimism crashed 22% as Base drifted from OP Stack, and sell volume and capital increased.
  • OP price was more likely to continue dropping unless it reclaimed the $0.20 resistance zone as support.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the main driver behind Optimism's (OP) 22% price drop?

AThe main driver was a fundamental change in its network as a Layer 2 solution, specifically the announcement that Base would be moving away from the OP Stack.

QHow much did the sell volume for OP increase by, according to CoinMarketCap?

AThe sell volume spiked by more than 157%.

QWhat was the net flow for OP spot trades, and what did it indicate?

AThe net flow for spot trades was $1.45 million OP, indicating that slightly more capital was deposited for selling than was withdrawn for buying.

QWhat technical pattern did the price of OP invalidate, leading to its decline?

AThe price invalidated an inverted heads-and-shoulders pattern that had faked out a bullish breakout.

QAccording to the analysis, what price level does OP need to reclaim to potentially shift its bearish direction?

AOP would need to reclaim the $0.20 resistance level as support to potentially change its price direction.

Letture associate

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit16 min fa

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit16 min fa

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit16 min fa

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit16 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News27 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News27 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片