OpenAI's Partnership with U.S. Department of Defense Sparks 300% Surge in ChatGPT Uninstallations on Announcement Day

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-04

Introduzione

On February 28th, the number of ChatGPT app uninstalls by U.S. users surged by 295% compared to the previous day, following the announcement of OpenAI's partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense (referred to as the "Department of War" during the Trump administration). Data from Sensor Tower indicates this was a significant deviation from ChatGPT’s average 30-day uninstall rate of 9%. In contrast, downloads of Claude, the AI app from OpenAI competitor Anthropic, increased by 51% on the same day. This shift in user behavior is attributed to Anthropic’s public refusal to collaborate with the Defense Department due to ethical concerns, including potential use of AI for citizen monitoring and autonomous weapons. ChatGPT’s download numbers fell by 13% on Saturday and a further 5% on Sunday. User sentiment was reflected in app reviews, with 1-star ratings for ChatGPT increasing by 775% on Saturday. Meanwhile, Claude rose to the top of the U.S. App Store’s free apps chart and also led charts in several other countries. Data from Appfigures and Similarweb corroborated these trends, noting Claude’s rapid growth in the U.S. and internationally.

Author: TechCrunch / Sensor Tower

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Insight: News of OpenAI's collaboration with the U.S. Department of Defense (renamed the "Department of War" under the Trump administration) has triggered strong backlash among users.

Meanwhile, Anthropic gained user trust by refusing to cooperate, with Claude's daily downloads surging and topping the App Store. This data directly quantify the practical impact of AI ethics stances on user behavior.

Full Text:

On February 28 (Saturday), the number of U.S. users uninstalling the ChatGPT mobile app increased by 295% compared to the previous day. This reaction was directly triggered by the news of OpenAI's partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)—a department renamed the "Department of War" during the Trump administration.

This data comes from market research firm Sensor Tower. Compared to ChatGPT's average 9% daily uninstallation rate over the past 30 days, the 295% single-day spike is a significant anomaly.

At the same time, downloads of Claude, developed by OpenAI's competitor Anthropic, saw a reverse trend in the U.S. On February 27 (Friday), downloads increased by 37% compared to the previous day, and on February 28 (Saturday), they rose by another 51%. Earlier, Anthropic announced its refusal to collaborate with the U.S. Department of Defense, citing an inability to agree on terms—Anthropic expressed concerns that AI would be used for surveilling U.S. citizens and deployed in fully autonomous weapon systems lacking safety capabilities.

The data indicates that a significant portion of users support Anthropic's stance on this issue.

ChatGPT's download numbers were also affected. On the Saturday following the announcement of the partnership, its U.S. downloads decreased by 13% compared to the previous day. The decline continued into Sunday, with another 5% drop. In contrast, on the Friday before the announcement, the app had recorded a 14% day-over-day growth in downloads.

These rapid changes were also reflected in Claude's App Store ranking. On Saturday, Claude climbed to the top of the U.S. App Store's free app chart, maintaining this position as of March 2 (Monday). This represents a rise of over 20 spots compared to about a week earlier (February 22, 2026).

Users also expressed their opinions on OpenAI's decision through app ratings. Sensor Tower data shows that on Saturday, the number of 1-star reviews for ChatGPT surged by 775%, with a further 100% increase on Sunday. Meanwhile, 5-star reviews decreased by 50% during the same period.

Other third-party data providers corroborated Sensor Tower's findings.

For example, Appfigures noted that on Saturday, Claude's total daily downloads in the U.S. surpassed ChatGPT's for the first time. The agency also observed an increase in Claude's U.S. downloads, though its estimates were higher: an 88% day-over-day increase on Saturday.

Appfigures also noted that Claude has now topped the free iPhone app charts in six countries outside the U.S., including Belgium, Canada, Germany, Luxembourg, Norway, and Switzerland.

A third market research firm, Similarweb, reported that Claude's U.S. downloads over the past week were approximately 20 times higher than in January. However, the agency cautioned that this may not be entirely due to political factors and could involve other reasons.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the 295% surge in ChatGPT mobile uninstallations on February 28th a direct reaction to?

AThe 295% surge in ChatGPT mobile uninstallations on February 28th was a direct reaction to the news of OpenAI signing a cooperation agreement with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).

QWhich competitor's app saw a significant increase in downloads and topped the U.S. App Store charts following its refusal to work with the Department of Defense?

AAnthropic's Claude app saw a significant increase in downloads and topped the U.S. App Store charts after it announced its refusal to cooperate with the Department of Defense.

QWhat were Anthropic's stated reasons for refusing to cooperate with the U.S. Department of Defense?

AAnthropic refused to cooperate due to concerns that AI would be used for surveillance of U.S. citizens and for fully autonomous weapon systems that do not yet have safety capabilities.

QHow did the user ratings for ChatGPT change, specifically the number of 1-star and 5-star reviews, after the news of the DoD partnership?

AAfter the news, the number of 1-star reviews for ChatGPT surged by 775% on Saturday and increased by another 100% on Sunday, while 5-star reviews decreased by 50% during the same period.

QAccording to the data, in how many countries outside the U.S. did Claude's app top the free iPhone application chart?

AClaude's app topped the free iPhone application chart in six countries outside the U.S.: Belgium, Canada, Germany, Luxembourg, Norway, and Switzerland.

Letture associate

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手44 min fa

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手44 min fa

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit58 min fa

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit58 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手58 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手58 min fa

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

Bitcoin's recent recovery from February lows is approaching a critical supply cluster between $84,000 and $88,000, which holds the largest concentration of Bitcoin supply on the current chart. This zone represents the cost basis for short-term holders (investors who bought within the last 155 days) and is stacked with "trapped" sellers who bought near those levels and are now at breakeven. Technical analysis suggests the rally faces significant resistance in this area. Two primary scenarios are outlined: a direct push into the $84k-$86k zone followed by a rejection and pullback to $70,000 support, or a more volatile path involving a dip before testing the supply cluster. A weekly close above $84,000 would weaken the bearish rejection case, but a decisive break above $86,900-$88,000 is needed for a stronger bullish confirmation. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,430.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

bitcoinist1 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures