OpenAI Restarts Robotics Business After Six Years, Short-term Bets on Assistive Robots

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-02

Introduzione

On June 1st, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the company's entry into the physical robotics arena, launching a new "OpenAI Robotics" team. The strategy has short and long-term goals: developing robots to assist technical workers with infrastructure in the near term, and envisioning personal robots for everyone eventually. This marks a return to robotics for OpenAI, which had a team from 2016-2019 before disbanding it to focus on large language models like GPT, leading to ChatGPT. The revival stems from the rapid progress of an internal "Worldsim" research project, now led by Sora co-creator Aditya Ramesh, and a shift in strategy following the end of a partnership with humanoid robotics firm Figure AI in early 2025 due to technical disagreements. OpenAI's approach leverages its leading AI models and "world model" capabilities, aiming to build the "brain" first before the physical body. The move also serves to present a new growth narrative—embodied AI and expansion into the physical world—ahead of its planned 2026 IPO, potentially helping to address investor concerns over its significant ongoing losses.

On June 1, a recruitment post shared by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on social media officially announced the company's entry into the physical robotics track. Altman stated that the company is forming a new team named "OpenAI Robotics" and is publicly recruiting full-stack hardware, operations, systems, and machine learning engineers. The goal is to "co-program and build robots that are truly useful to society."

According to Altman's explanation, OpenAI's robotics strategy has both short-term and long-term goals. In the short term, OpenAI focuses on developing robots that can assist technical workers in building future infrastructure. In the long run, the company envisions a future where every person can own a personal robot capable of fulfilling various needs.

Altman revealed that the move into robotics is based on the rapid development of an internal OpenAI research project called "Worldsim." This project evolved over the past year into OpenAI Robotics, led by the company's Research Vice President, Aditya Ramesh, a core developer of the text-to-image model DALL·E and the video generation model Sora. The project's foundation lies in the deep integration and co-design of robotics hardware research and machine learning research.

OpenAI's return to the robotics field is, in fact, a "comeback." As early as the company's founding days, robotics technology was a crucial direction in its exploration of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Between 2016 and 2019, OpenAI successively launched the reinforcement learning benchmark environment OpenAI Gym, the open-source robot simulation platform Roboschool, and successfully developed a dexterous robotic hand named Dactyl.

In 2019, OpenAI, using reinforcement learning and "Automatic Domain Randomization" (ADR) technology, trained an AI system that enabled a humanoid robotic hand to successfully solve a Rubik's Cube. This research proved the feasibility of the technical path of training in a simulation environment and then transferring the capabilities to a real robot. However, due to the scarcity of robotics training data and slow iteration at that time, contrasted with the vast and easily accessible text and image data on the internet, OpenAI made a strategic decision around 2020: to disband the robotics team and concentrate resources on the development of large language models represented by the GPT series. This decision ultimately led to the creation of ChatGPT.

In the following years, OpenAI ignited the global large model boom with its ChatGPT series of products, becoming the world's highest-valued AI unicorn. According to multiple media reports, OpenAI secretly submitted a draft IPO prospectus on May 22, planning to go public as early as September 2026. In its latest round of financing completed in March of this year, OpenAI's valuation reached $852 billion. Institutions like Deutsche Bank predict its listing valuation could exceed $1 trillion, with a fundraising scale potentially reaching $60 billion, potentially making it one of the largest tech IPOs in U.S. public market history.

Nevertheless, OpenAI also faces significant pressure from substantial losses. The company is projected to incur a full-year loss of approximately $14 billion in 2026, with cash burn expected to further expand. It might not achieve cash flow break-even until 2030 at the earliest. Its gross margin is only about 33%, with the high inference costs of AI models being the primary reason for eroding profits.

During the years after disbanding its in-house robotics team, OpenAI did not completely abandon the robotics track. Instead, it adopted a "multi-point investment" strategy through its venture fund, successively investing in several robotics startups, including the Norwegian humanoid robot company 1X Technologies, the American humanoid robot star company Figure AI, and Physical Intelligence.

The most notable collaboration was with Figure AI in February 2024. At that time, OpenAI not only participated in Figure AI's $675 million Series B funding round but also announced the development of a dedicated multimodal AI model for Figure's humanoid robots. Just 13 days after the partnership was announced, the Figure 01 humanoid robot equipped with the OpenAI model demonstrated fluent natural language interaction, object recognition, and autonomous operation capabilities.

However, this collaboration lasted less than a year. In February 2025, Figure AI founder Brett Adcock officially announced the termination of the partnership with OpenAI, opting to independently develop an end-to-end robot AI model. The primary reason for the breakdown was a divergence in technical approaches. Figure believed that general-purpose large models could not adapt to the hardware requirements of robots; it was essential to create a vertically integrated end-to-end model. This also prompted OpenAI, after a six-year hiatus, to choose to "revive" its robotics team, personally entering the field and upgrading robotics from an "investment" to an "internal strategic business."

Simultaneously, this is also OpenAI's move to outline a new growth narrative for the capital market ahead of its IPO. It aims to show investors a grand vision of transitioning from pure software to a software-hardware combination and expanding from the virtual world to the physical world. The company hopes to use the "embodied intelligence" story to hedge against market concerns about the sustainability of its business model and its massive losses.

OpenAI's advantage in entering the robotics field lies in its globally leading AI large model capabilities, particularly its "world model" for understanding and simulating the physical world. Its technical path may differ from many companies starting with hardware platforms, instead following a logic of "first build the brain, then grow the body." This means first enabling the AI to understand physical laws through a powerful world model, then infusing that capability into physical robots. If successful, this software- and algorithm-defined hardware approach could reshape the R&D model of the robotics industry.

This article is from "Jiemian News," author: Li Kefeng

Domande pertinenti

QWhy is OpenAI restarting its robotics business after six years?

AOpenAI is restarting its robotics business primarily due to the rapid development of its internal 'Worldsim' research project, which evolved into 'OpenAI Robotics'. Additionally, a strategic partnership breakdown with Figure AI over technical disagreements on AI model integration for robots prompted the company to bring robotics back as an in-house strategic business, moving beyond mere investment.

QWhat are the short-term and long-term goals for OpenAI's new robotics strategy?

AOpenAI's short-term goal is to develop robots capable of assisting technical workers in building future infrastructure. Its long-term vision is to create personal robots for everyone that can fulfill various needs.

QWhat was the outcome and significance of OpenAI's Dactyl robotic hand research in 2019?

AIn 2019, OpenAI successfully trained an AI system to solve a Rubik's Cube using a Dactyl robotic hand. This research demonstrated the feasibility of training AI in simulation and transferring that capability to a real-world robot, proving a key technical pathway.

QHow did OpenAI's collaboration with Figure AI in 2024 proceed and end?

AIn February 2024, OpenAI invested in Figure AI's funding round and developed a multimodal AI model for its humanoid robot. The integrated robot demonstrated impressive capabilities within 13 days. However, the partnership ended in February 2025 when Figure AI decided to build its own end-to-end AI model, citing that general-purpose large models couldn't adequately meet specific robot hardware requirements.

QWhat is OpenAI's potential approach to developing robots, according to the article?

AOpenAI's potential approach is described as 'building the brain first, then the body.' This means focusing first on developing a powerful 'world model' AI that understands physical laws, and then instilling that capability into physical robots. This software and algorithm-first approach could potentially reshape robotics R&D.

Letture associate

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

"DeepSeek and the $1 Trillion Infrastructure Question" The article examines whether DeepSeek's AI optimization breakthroughs could potentially save China $1 trillion in future AI infrastructure costs. The analysis begins with Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI platform, costing ~$7.8 million, where memory (HBM4/LPDDR5X) constitutes $2 million—a 435% cost increase in one year, highlighting how AI hardware spending is shifting toward expensive memory components. DeepSeek's approach works in the opposite direction. Through three key technical innovations showcased in DeepSeek V4, the company dramatically improves hardware efficiency: 1. **Memory Compression (MLA)**: Re-engineers the attention mechanism to compress long-context memory (KV Cache) by over 90%, drastically reducing expensive HBM usage. 2. **Selective Activation (MoE)**: Employs Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only a small fraction of parameters (e.g., 49B out of 1.6T in V4-Pro) are activated per token, allowing most parameters to reside in cheaper memory/SSD. 3. **Computation Caching**: Reuses previously computed results via cache hits, replacing expensive GPU computations with cheap memory reads. Combined, these optimizations allow the same hardware to produce approximately 4x more tokens, effectively reducing required hardware investment by 75%. DeepSeek's pricing reflects this: a 10-billion token workload costs ~$522 monthly versus ~$9,000-$10,000 for competitors. The $1 trillion savings projection stems from McKinsey's estimate that global AI infrastructure will require ~$5.2 trillion investment by 2030. As China's daily token consumption grows toward quadrillions, even marginal efficiency gains scale massively. With a conservative 4x throughput improvement, China could avoid building tens of thousands of AI data centers equivalent to ~7 trillion RMB ($1 trillion) in saved investment. Critically, this strategy shifts dependency from scarce, expensive GPU/HBM—where China lags—toward more accessible storage, caching, and systems engineering where domestic suppliers like CXMT are gaining strength. Rather than "replacing Nvidia," DeepSeek rebalances AI's value chain away from monolithic hardware dependency. Ultimately, DeepSeek's technical breakthroughs could lower the barrier to AI adoption across Chinese industries by making advanced capabilities affordable at scale—transforming who can access next-generation AI.

marsbit41 min fa

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

marsbit41 min fa

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

This paper, "Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward," proposes a paradigm shift in combating AI hallucination. It argues that the current mainstream approaches—striving for omniscience by scaling data/models or having AI abstain from uncertain answers—are fundamentally flawed. The former has inevitable knowledge gaps, while the latter imposes a crippling "utility tax," requiring the rejection of many correct answers to achieve high accuracy, due to models' poor "discrimination" (the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect answers internally). The core contribution is redefining hallucination not as "being wrong," but as "expressing false information with unwarranted certainty." The proposed solution is **Faithful Uncertainty** or **Metacognition**: enabling AI to accurately perceive its internal uncertainty and honestly express it in its language (e.g., using hedging phrases when unsure). This creates a more reliable assistant that provides useful information while signaling its confidence, minimizing harm from errors. The paper emphasizes that metacognition is critical for the era of AI Agents. Without it, Agents cannot intelligently decide when to use tools like search engines, leading to inefficiency and misuse. Key implementation challenges are highlighted: the "bootstrapping paradox" of training with static uncertainty data, the "alignment distortion signal" where human preference training suppresses internal uncertainty cues, and the difficulty of causally evaluating true metacognition vs. its superficial imitation. The paper concludes that the goal should not be an infallible AI, but one that is honest about the limits of its knowledge, thereby building user trust through transparent communication of its certainty.

marsbit46 min fa

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

marsbit46 min fa

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin has recently declined, hitting a two-month low near $66,123, while Ethereum fell to a three-month low around $1,837. Analysts suggest the drop is not merely due to factors like ETF outflows or MicroStrategy's selling but reflects a deeper issue: Bitcoin is losing a broader asset competition. In a near-zero interest rate environment, Bitcoin previously thrived as an outlet for investor dissatisfaction with inflation and limited options. However, the market landscape has shifted. Bitcoin now occupies an "awkward middle ground," facing competition on three fronts. For inflation hedging, investors prefer gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers—assets with tangible backing and clearer pricing power. For growth exposure, AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits are more attractive. Even within crypto, investors can choose stablecoins, exchanges, or infrastructure firms tied directly to adoption, offering clearer business models and leverage. Thus, Bitcoin is no longer the top choice for hedging, growth, or crypto exposure. This shift is evident in market reactions: despite recent warnings about persistent inflation from a Fed official, Bitcoin did not rally as it might have in the past. Instead, capital flowed to assets with direct commodity or energy exposure. The recent ETF outflows and MicroStrategy sales are symptoms, not causes, of this new reality. Investors are becoming more selective, demanding clearer value propositions beyond mere scarcity. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is not about it being a bubble or failed technology, but that scarcity alone is no longer sufficient.

华尔街日报48 min fa

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

华尔街日报48 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片