OpenAI Researcher: 100% of Code Handed Over to AI, Claude Rewrites Python Library

marsbitPubblicato 2026-08-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-17

Introduzione

OpenAI researchers and prominent developers like DHH (creator of Ruby on Rails) are reporting a dramatic shift toward AI-driven coding, with some claiming they no longer write code manually. DHH recently used Claude Fable 5 to fully rewrite the Python library "TerminalTextEffects" into Rust in a single, largely unassisted session, consuming 110 million tokens. The resulting Rust executable is only 3MB, with startup time slashed from 87ms to 2ms and a 9.6x render speed increase. This follows DHH's own reversal from a year ago, when he opposed ceding coding to AI, fearing the loss of "muscle memory" and deep learning. Now, he predicts that within five years, few people will be writing or reading code directly. The article highlights other large-scale migrations, like Bun's move from Zig to Rust in under two weeks, suggesting the marginal cost of code generation is nearing zero. The future role of programmers is envisioned as shifting from writing code to defining requirements, designing constraints, establishing test frameworks, and validating AI output—focusing on discerning "what is worth building" and "what is correct."

Claude Code's creator has publicly stated that he hasn't handwritten a single line of code in over two months.

In a single day, he can merge 27 PRs, all handled by Claude.

OpenAI researcher roon was even more extreme: 'I don't write code anymore; 100% is done by GPT.'

Now, another big name, after deeply experiencing Claude Code and Codex, declared, 'In five years, humans won't write code anymore!'

These past few days, Rails creator DHH personally took on a major task—

Using only Claude Fable 5, he completely rewrote the Python library 'TerminalTextEffects' into Rust in one go.

What's astonishing is that this refactoring consumed a staggering 11 million tokens, almost completing it in a single pass.

The results after it ran were nothing short of 'cheating'—startup time was compressed from 87 milliseconds to just 2 milliseconds, and rendering speed skyrocketed by 9.6 times.

The post instantly garnered millions of views across the internet.

One AI expert directly posed a soul-searching question to the Rails creator: 'If that's the case, where does Ruby go in the next five years?'

DHH's answer was straightforward—

Within five years, not many people will be writing or reading code by hand anymore. So, it really doesn't matter.

Who would have thought that in just one year, the contrast would be so stark!

Handing the Keyboard to AI, Rather Retire

Remember, in May of last year, DHH was firmly stating online that he refused to cede the joy of coding to AI.

In that lengthy post 'Coding should be a vibe!', he clearly stated:

AI is, at best, an assistive 'pair programmer,' good for looking up APIs and answering questions.

He even issued a stern warning: 'If the day comes when I must completely hand the keyboard over to AI, I would rather retire.'

I have zero interest in giving up coding. It's not some chore to offload to AI. What would be the point? To become a project manager for a pack of AI 'hooligans'?

In that six-hour deep-dive conversation with Lex Fridman, DHH insisted that every line of his code was typed by his own hands.

Once, while building a Linux distribution, he repeatedly asked AI to generate the same Bash conditional statement, only to realize that because he lacked the physical act of typing, he never truly mastered it.

This loss of 'muscle memory' left him deeply unsettled. 'Is this the end of learning?'

However, by April this year, the winds had shifted dramatically.

On a podcast, he admitted he had now fully switched to 'Agent-first,' essentially saying goodbye to handwritten code.

Yet, no one expected the phrase 'in five years, not many people will be reading or writing code' to come from the mouth of the Rails creator.

Fable 5 All-in, No One Writes Code in Five Years

Let's take a closer look at this hardcore Python rewrite by Claude.

TerminalTextEffects, or TTE for short, is a terminal visual effects engine.

It can be used both as a command-line program and imported as a Python library into other applications.

Developers can, like magicians, control text trajectories, colors, gradient effects, and animation sequences, transforming dull UIs into something cool.

The Rust version demonstrated by DHH can run 37 effects.

A piece of software that originally required a Python runtime environment was transformed by Claude's refactoring into a mere 3MB executable.

This new repository is called ttfx, hosted under DHH's own Omarchy organization, with every commit history intact.

The entire process took 3 hours and 11 minutes. The main Rust code is 21,000 lines, almost the same volume as the original Python version.

During the task, 8 Agents each worked on a separate branch simultaneously, in batches: reading the code themselves, generating implementations, compiling, running tests, handling failures, then moving to the next round.

The so-called 'one-shot' was essentially handing the task over once.

Using the same method, DHH had Codex complete it, and the results after a single prompt were also excellent.

However, it was 30% slower and cost $43 (290 RMB) in Tokens.

DHH's hardcore operation directly blew up the community, drawing out several Anthropic bigwigs.

Claude Code creator Boris Cherny couldn't help but appear in the comments exclaiming, 'This is insane!'

Faced with a follow-up question from another researcher, Thariq, DHH revealed an even more astonishing detail—

He simply asked Claude to formulate a plan. After that, it was zero intervention throughout, no complex workflows applied, no specific goals pre-set; it was all about complete delegation of authority.

Million-Line Codebase, Bun One-Click Migration

TerminalTextEffects, after all, is limited in scale.

What truly demonstrates the power of AI coding is a massive refactoring in Bun's core.

A few months ago, founder Jarred Sumner personally spearheaded the migration of the massive codebase from Zig to Rust in its entirety.

It's astonishing that this monumental project, involving a million lines of code, was declared 'complete' in less than two weeks.

If this were a few years ago, a project of this magnitude would have been a marathon lasting several quarters, if not years.

Future Coders to Become 'Dragon Tamers'

Now, all signs are frantically hinting at a fact that is both brutal and exciting—

The marginal cost of code generation is approaching zero.

This inevitably plunges many into panic. 'If no one reads or writes code in five years, will programmers disappear?'

Actually, 'no one writes code' absolutely does not equal 'programmers disappear.'

The core work of future programmers will undergo a fundamental shift—

From 'personally implementing code' to fully focusing on defining requirements, designing constraints, establishing testing frameworks, and judging whether the AI wrote it correctly.

It's foreseeable that when 'handcrafting code' becomes history, the only remaining scarce moats will be two points:

Insight into 'what is worth doing' + defining 'what counts as correct.'

Rather than worrying about losing your keyboard, it's better to start thinking now: what kind of Rome do you want to command this boundless-compute 'super coder' AI to build?

References:

https://x.com/dhh/status/2086713611934695848?s=20

https://claude.ai/code/artifact/287825bc-7aad-4541-a7e7-fa4ba8d03612

This article is from the WeChat public account "New Zhiyuan", author: Taozi

Domande pertinenti

QWhat major transformation did DHH perform using Claude Fable 5?

AHe completely rewrote the Python library 'TerminalTextEffects' into Rust in one go.

QWhat were the performance improvements after the AI-assisted rewrite of TerminalTextEffects?

AStartup time was reduced from 87 milliseconds to just 2 milliseconds, and rendering speed increased by 9.6 times.

QAccording to DHH, what will happen to human coding in the next five years?

AVery few people will be hand-writing or reading code anymore, as the focus will shift to other tasks.

QWhat significant project did Bun founder Jarred Sumner undertake with AI assistance?

AHe migrated the entire massive codebase of Bun from Zig to Rust in less than two weeks.

QWhat does the article suggest will be the core role of future programmers in the age of AI coding?

ATheir core role will shift from writing code to defining requirements, designing constraints, establishing testing systems, and judging whether the AI's output is correct.

Letture associate

Besu Patches Vulnerabilities in 5 Components: What Node Operators Need to Know

The Ethereum client Besu, developed by the Hyperledger community, has patched five security vulnerabilities discovered by blockchain security firm CertiK. These vulnerabilities, detailed in four security advisories on August 14, were all addressed in version 26.7.1, an urgent security update initially released on July 27. The intentional delay between the patch release and the public disclosure of details gave node operators a crucial window to update. JiaLiang Chang, CertiK's Director of Security Engineering, explained this "patch first, details later" model provides defenders a time advantage, allowing them to identify affected systems, test the update, and coordinate deployments—particularly important for institutional or permissioned blockchain networks requiring formal change management. The vulnerabilities, found through CertiK's "Chain Scan" attack methodology, involved issues in block announcement handling, consensus proposal buffering, WebSocket subscription limits, and JSON-RPC filter creation. If exploited, they could have allowed an attacker to exhaust a node's memory or thread resources, compromising its availability and the consensus process. Chang highlighted that while the open-source ecosystem is moving toward more formalized security testing (like differential fuzzing and bug bounty programs), coverage remains uneven. Testing often focuses more on protocol compliance than on continuous resource exhaustion, race conditions, or deployment-specific failures. He emphasized that third-party research remains vital for uncovering attack vectors beyond routine development, advocating for a mature, cumulative security model combining continuous integration, multi-node attack testing, independent audits, and regression testing for each confirmed vulnerability.

cryptonews.ru20 min fa

Besu Patches Vulnerabilities in 5 Components: What Node Operators Need to Know

cryptonews.ru20 min fa

Hack of Term Finance: Attacker Withdraws $8.5 Million Through Governance System Vulnerability

Decentralized lending protocol Term Finance lost $8.5 million due to an exploit of its governance mechanism, not a smart contract hack. The attacker manipulated the low voter turnout in the Meta Vaults system. By depositing just 0.5 ETH, they received a token (tmvETH) representing a share in the vault. Most users did not convert this token into a separate voting token (gtmvETH). The attacker did, gaining control of 90.66% of the issued voting power despite owning only 0.017% of the vault's capital. The attacker created a legitimate governance proposal to disable the 7-day withdrawal timelock and add their own contract to receive user funds. The proposal, publicly viewable for about 145 hours, passed due to a quorum requirement of only 5% and simple majority rule. After voting ended on August 23, 2026, the proposal was executed, allowing the immediate theft of 2,841 WETH and 1.68 million USDC (later swapped for DAI) from several vaults. The incident highlights systemic risks in decentralized governance when voting rights are separated from economic stake and low participation thresholds exist. Security mechanisms like timelocks were ineffective as the attacker could disable them from within the proposal itself. In response, Term Labs irrevocably closed all Meta Vaults and revoked DAO roles. The core lending protocol remained unaffected. The attack underscores the need for governance designs where security parameters are protected from modification through ordinary proposals.

cryptonews.ru21 min fa

Hack of Term Finance: Attacker Withdraws $8.5 Million Through Governance System Vulnerability

cryptonews.ru21 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片